PC 74-205_. _ .~ • ".. xESOL .. ~ .
UTION N0.
.. .._..
PC7~+-2Q5 ~
A RESOLUTION OF TNE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE N0. 2642 BE DENIED
WHEREAS, the Citv Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim did receive a verified Petitioa for Variance from
RICHARD BENTLEY, 1425 East Lincoln Avenue, Anaheim, California 92805 (Owner); COUNTY OF
ORANGE; DEPARTMENT OF REAL PR01'ERTY S&RVICES, 400 Civic Center Drive West, Santa Ana,
California 92701 (Agent); of certain real property situated in the City+•of Anaheim,
County of Orange, State of California, described as Lot Nos. 3 and 4 of Tract No. 2481
as per map recorded in book 72.page Zy cf Miscellaneous Maps, in the office of the
county recorder of said county; and
WHEREAS, thc City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City Hall in the City of Analteim on
Octobe r 14, 1974, at 2:00 o'clock p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and
in accordance with the provisions of the Mlheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.68, to hear and consid~:r evidence for and uguinst said
proposed variance and to investigate and make findings and recommandations in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation, and study made by itse:f and in its behalf, and after due
consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find and determine the following facts:
1. That thc petitioner requests the fo 1 1 ow i ng • va r i~ance f rom •t7~e Anahe i m Mun i c i pa 1 Code , to
establish a Methadone Maintenance Treatment Program Medical Clinic:
SECTION 18.40.070(4)(a) - Minimum off-street parking. (54 spaces required; ~6
spaces existing)
2. That the above-mentioned waiver is hereby denied on the basis that evidence was .
presented that substantiated a currenf parking shortage at the subject location for the
existing uses, and the propo;al would further compound thet situation.
3. That the Planning Commission indicated thair suppor.t of locating the Methadone
Maintenance Treatment Program Medical Clinic in the City of Anaheim, but indicated that it
should be located further from a public scltool than proposed ir, subject petition, since thc
vehicular traffic generated by such a ase was not conducive to the safety and welfare of
school children.
4. That there are no exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions appli-
cable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply
generally to the ppoperty or class of use in the same vicinity and zone.
5. That the requested variance is not necessary °or the preservation and enjoyment of
a substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone, and
denied to the property in question.
6. That the requested variance will be materially detrin~ental to the p~blic welfare
or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zon? in wh~ch the property
is located.
7. That two (2) persons appeared, representing approximat'ely twelve (12) persons
present at ssid public hearing in opposition to subject petition; that two (2) letters were
received in opposition to subject petition; a~d that petitions containing approximately 114
signatures were received in opposition to subject petition.
V1-D _~ _ RESOLUTION N0. PC74-205
~EV-66-E
..~
,....._ _.__.... _ _.__._._..__,. __,
~
_......__.,_.~ ._ :
ENVIRONMENTNL IMPACT RcPORT FINDING; •
That the Director of Development Services has determined that the proposed activity falls
within the definition of Section 3.01, Class i of the City ofi Anaheim Guidelines to the
Requirements for an Environmental Impact Report and is, therefore, categorically exempt f'rom
the requirement to file an EIR.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Maheim City Planning Commission does hereby deny subject Petition for
Variance on the basis of the aforementioned finds.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUI'lON is signed and approved by me this 14th day of October, 1974.
,~
~~ -
---2 ~ IRMAN ANAHE CI PLAMIING COMA4ISSION
ATTEST:
~ ~ ~ ~ ~~.~ ~J
SECII2ETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
SfATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY ~F ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Pa t r i c i a B. Scah I an , Secretary of the City Planning Commission of Ehe City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the
foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the City Planning Cammission of the City of Maheim, heid on
0ctobe r I4, t 974, at 2:00 o'clock p.m., by the fallowing vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: FARANO, GAUER, JOHNSON, KING, MORLEY, TOLAR, HERBST,
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: PIONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
IN WITNESS WfiEREOF, I have heceunto set my hand this 14th day of Octobe r, 1974.
~~-~~~J~ ' J
SECRETARY ANAHEIM C1TY PLANNING COMMISSION
V2-D
-2-
RESOLUTION N0. PC74-205