PC 74-22~ , . RESOLUTION II~- PC74-22 ~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF TIiE CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT~--BE GRANTED
WHEREAS, the Ci!y Plenning Commission of the City of Anehe;m did r~ceive a verified Petition Ear Con-
ditional Use Pecmit fiom LEONARD G, SMITH, TRUSTEE, 125-D South Claudina Street, Anaheim,
California 42805, Owner of certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim,
County of Orange, State of California, desc:3bed as Lot Nos,. 17 and 18 of the.Konig
Subdivision
; end
WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commissiou did hold a public hearing at the City liall in the City of Aneheim
on JBnuary 21, 1974, at 7:30 o'clock P.M., notice of said public hearing heving been duly given
as ceqitiied by:law and in eccordence :~ith the provisions of the Maheim Municipal code, Chepter 18.64,to heer
and consider evidence for and against said proposed conditional use end to investigete end meke Eindings and
recommendations in connection therewith; end
WHEREAS, said Commission, efter due inspection, investigation, and study mede by itself and in its be-
half, and after ilue consideration of ell evidence and repocts offered at said hearing, does find and determine the
following fects:
1. Thet the pcoposed use is properly one for which a Conditional Use Permit is aethorized by Code Section
18.52.050(1)(a), to wit: estsblish an ouCdoor recreational vehicle s~orage yard, with
waivers of: ~
a. SECTIONr18.52.060(3)(a) - Screening adiacent to residential zone.
(6-foot high enclosure required; no enclosure
and 6-foot high chainlink fence nroposed)
b. SECTION 18.52.060(3)(U; - Enclosure of outdoor uses, (6-foot high en-
closure required; 6-foot high chainlink fence
propoaed)
c, SECTION 1£3.52.060 4 b - Off-street perking. (6 parking spaces required;
0 parkinq epaces proposed)
d. SECTION 18.62.090B(5) - Permitted free-standing eign location. (Mini-
mum 39 feet L-rom north property line required;
32 feet proposed)
2. That Waivers 1-a and 1-b, above-mentioned, are hereby granted on the basis that
the petitioner demonstrated that a hardship relating to adequate`police protection for the
proposed use would 3E created if view-screening was provided; and, further, that the sub-
ject property is located in s transitional area.
r
3. That Waiver i-c, above-mentioned, is here'r,y granted on the basis that the proposr.d .
use would not require off-street customer parking and said use would be within the intent
of the original M-1 Deed Restrictions for eubject prcperty.
4. That Waiver 1-d, above-menticned, ic hereby granted on the basis that the peti-
tioner demonstrated a hardship would be created if said waiver was not granted, based on
the plans, as aubmitted.
-1-
RESOLUTION N0. PC74-22
_,, ~ ~ •
5. That the petitioner stipulated to erecting a chainlink fence along the northerly
side of subject property abutting the R-3 parcel, in the event the existing building lo-
cated on the adjacent R-3 parcel and on said properCy 'line is demolished.
6. That ~.".e proposed use will not adversely affect the adjoining land uses and the
growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be located.
7. ~hat the size and ~hape of the site proposed for the use is adequate to allow
the full development of the ~roposed use in a manner not detrimental to the particular
area nor to the peace, health, safety, and general welfare oE the Citizens of the City
of Anaheim,
8. That the granting of the Condittonal Use Permit under the cot~ditions imposted, if
any, will not be detrimental io the peace, health, safety, and general welfare of the Citi-
zens of the City of Anaheim.
9. That une person appeared at said public hearing in opposition to subject petition.
ENVIRONPSENTAL IMPACT. REPORi FINDINC~;
That th~ Planning Coc~anission, in connection with an Er.emption Declaration SCatus request,
finds and determines that the proposal would have no significant environmentai impact and,
therefore, recommends to tne City Gouncil that no Environmental Impact Statement is aec2s-
sary.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT R~SOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby
grant subject Petition for Conditional Use Permit, upon the following conditions which are
hereby found to be a r.ecessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the subject proFerl'y in
order to preserve the safety and general welfare of the Citizens of the City of A~naheim:
(1) That the owner(s) of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim a strip
of land 10 feet in width from the centerline of the alley along the south side of subject
property for alley widening purposes,
(2) That sidewalks bhall be installed along Claudina Street as required by the City
~ngineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of
the City Engineer.
(3) That trash storage areas Rhall be provided in accordance ~!ith approved plans on
file with the office of the Director of Public Works,
(4) That sub~ect property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans
and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked Exhiliit No. 1.
(5) That Condition No. 1, above-mentioned, shall be complied with prior to the com-
mencement of the activity authorized under this resolution, or prior to the ti.me that the
building permit is issued, or within a period of one year from date hereof, whichever
occurs first, or such further time as the Planning Commission may grant.
(6) That Condition Nos. 2, 3 and 4, above-mentioned, shall be compiied with prior
to final building and zoning inspections.
(7) That in the event the existing building located on the adjacent R-3 parcel and
aSutting the northerYy praperty line of subject prvperty is demolished, a 6-foot high
chainlink fence shall be Erected, as stipulated to by the petitioner,
THF, FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 21st day of January, 1974.
~~I .G/f~D'7'L~4v~e K
CHAIIL N ANAHEIM CI:TY PLANNING COMMISSION 7
ATTEST:
.~G.G~~L.~.~.,~/
S~CRETARY ARAHE~ ITY PLANNING CONI~IISSION
-Z-
?2ESOLUTION N0. PC74-22
~ . ~ ~'
3TATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) $s.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
~ ~
I, Patricia B. Scanlan, Secretary of the Ciiy Planning Commisaion of the City of
Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a
meeting of the City Planning Commission of the City of 9naheim, held on January 21,
1974, at 7:3U o'clock p.m., by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: HERBST, KING, SEYMOUR, GAUER.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: FARANO.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 21st day of January, 197G.
~~ ~ `"'"`"~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CIT PLANNING COMMISSION
-3-
RESOLUTION N0. PC74-22