PC 74-248•- It~SO~IONNO. .-.__`_ PCZ4_2!~8,_._.__._..~. . .. .. _
A KGSOLU'fION OF THE CITY VLANNING COMMISSION OF 507~~rLt OGf ANTY:DM11
T11:1T PL?T1TlnN FOR ('ONDITIONAL USIi PGR111T N0.
1VHERtiAS, tl~c Ciry Planning Connnission of Uu City of An.+hcim Gid reccivc a vcrificd Pctiiion for Conditional Usc 1'ennil
from ALDOR. CORPOP,ATIOPJ, Alex L. Fishman, 22: F~~i~ion Lane, Suite 106, Tustin, Caiifornia
92680 (Owner) of certain real property situated in the City of Anahei'm, County of Orange,
State cf California, J~scribed as The North 185.OU feet of the East 203.00 feet of the
North half of the northeast quarter, of Lot 1!+ in Dlock "K" of„the Kraemer Tract, as per
map recorded in book 12 pages 87 and 88 of Miscellaneous Records, `in the office of the
county recorder of Los Angeles County, California
;and
WHEREAS, the City Planning Comm~ssion :did hold a public hearing in the City Hall in thc City of Anaheim on
Decembe r 23 ,~ 974, ~~ 2• 00 ° ~~ock;p m notice of said public liearing having been duly given as required by law and in
accordance witl~ the pro~isions of`tlie Anafieim:M.tinicipal Code, Chapter ~$,61, to hear and consider evidence for and against said
proposed conditional use aiid to investigate anil.make fndings and recommendations in connection Aierewith; and
NHEREAS, said Commission after. due mspcc(ion; imesti~tion, and study msde by itself and in its bchaif, and aftcr due
consideration of all eJidence and'rcports o(ferccl;:p.,said hearing; does find and dcterminc the following facts:
1. That the proposed'use is propedy one:Por wfiicli a Conditional Usc Permit is authorized by Codc Seet i on
18.61,050.055 to permit're-e'st'ab.lishi.ng a service station in the ML Zone with waiver of:
SECTION •1'8:87:A3~:072.'-..Min'imum lands'capinq adiacent to interior boundaries. (IS
~ . ~trees`re.quired; none proposed)
2. That the pi.oposcd use will nat advcrscly af(ect the adjoining land uses and the growth and devclopment of thc arca in
which it is proposed to be located.
3. That the size and shape oC the site proposed (or the use is adequate to allow thc full development of tlie proposcd use in a
manner not detrimental to the particular arca nor to the peace, healtlt, saCety, and gene~al wel(arc o( 1hc Citizens o( the City of
Anaheim.
4. That the grantingof the Conditional Use Pem:it under the conditions imposed, if any, will not be detrimental to ihe pcacc,
health, safety, and general welfare of thc Citizcns of the City of Anaheim.
5, That tne waiver is yranted since this is a~ existing service station and no re-
modeling is being done at this time, that thare would be no substantial change in the
appearance of the station by adding of trees.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FINDING:
That the Director of Development Services has determined that the proposed activity falls
within the definition ~f Section 3.01, Class 1 of the City oF Anaheim Guideljnes to the
Requirements for an Environmental Impac'~ Report and is, therefore, categorically exempt from
the requirement to file an EIR,
CI-G '
oEV-a~•o RESOLUTIUN N0. PC%4-24$
~ ,._.
4
~ ~
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anoheim City Plnnning Commission does herefiy grnnt subject
Petition Eor Conditionel Use Permit, upon the following conditions which ere hereby found to be a necesser~ prerequisite
to the proposed use oi the subject property in otder to preserve the sefety and general welfere of the Citizens of the
City of Anah^im:
1. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance ~oith plans
and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit No. l.
2. That Condition No. 1, above-mentioned, shall be complied with prior to the
commencement of the act~vity autliorized under this resolution, or prior to the time that
the building pei•mit is issued, or a~ithin a period of one year from date hereof, whichever
c~ccurs first, or such further time as the Planning Commission and/or City Council may grant.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 23rd day of December, 1974.
C AIRMAN ANA iM CITY PLANNIPIG COMMISSION
,4TTEST:
s ~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNIP]G ISSION
PR6 TEM
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COllNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
Pro Tem
I, Aletha fl, Burgess$ecretary~of the City Planning Commission af the City of Anaheim, do hereby certity thet
the foregoing resolution wes passed and adopted at a meeting of the City Planning Commission of the City of Aneheim,
held on December 23, 197~+, at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: FARANO, GAUER, JOHNSON, KING, 110RLEY, TOLAR, HERBST
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMI7ISSIONERS: NONE
IN WITNESS WNEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 23rd day of December, 1974,
~~.Q~ ~
SECRETARY~ ANAHEIM CITY PLANNIN MISSION
PRO TEM
C2-G
-z-
RESOLUTION N0, PC74-248