PC 74-250, .. ~ ~
RESOLUTION N0. PC74-250
A RESOLUTIGN OF THE CITY PLANNING COMM26560~N OF TBE GR N~TEDNAHEIM
THAT PGTiTION FOR ~ ARIANCE N0. -
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim did raceive a verified Petition for Vaciance
Erom WAYNE HUST, 136 West 5immons Avenue, Anaheim, California 92802 (Okner); GEORGE JEFFERS,
13411 Yorba Street, Santa Ana, California 92705 (Agent) of ceriain real property situated
in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, Stateso~~Candfl2~,'MiscellaneousaMapst 9n~theroffic
No. 6184, as per map recorded in book 243. P 9
of the county recorder of said county.
; and
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a publis heoring at the City Hell in the City of Anaheim
on Decemoer 23, 1974~ ~t 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of said public hearing huving been duly given as required
by 1'aw and in accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18, 0~, to hear end consider evi-
dence for and against said proposed variance and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection
therewith; and '
NHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigetion, and study made by itself end in its behalE,
and aEter due consideration of all evidence and ceports offered nt seid hearing, does find and detennine Ute following
facts:
1. That the petitione~ requests a varience from the Anaheim Municipal Code: to eonstruct a housc
addition, with waivers of:
a. SECTION 18.27.U62.021 - Minimum lot area. (5z850 square feet required; 5,500
sJc uare feet proposed)
b. SECTION 18.27.062.021 - Maximum lot coverage. (~ permitted; 37•5% proposed)
2, Thet there are exceptional or extcaordinary r_ircumstances or conditions epplicable to the property involved
ot to t}te intended use of the prop2rty that do not ~pply generally to the property or class oE use in Fhe same vicinity and
zone:
3. That the reyuested varionce is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right
possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone, and denied to the property in question.
4, That the reyuested variance will not be materielly detrimental to the public welfare o: injurious to the prop-
ecty oc impcovements in such vicinity and zone in which the propecty is loceted.
S, That the above-mentioned oaivers are hereby granted on the basis that the request
is minimal for the use as proposed.
6, That the granting of the waivers would not be detrimental to surrou~ding properties
7, That no one appeared in opposition.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FINDING:
That the Director of Development Services has determined that the proposed activity falls
within the definition of Section 3.G1, Class 3 of the City of Anaheim Guidelines to the
Requirements for an Environmental Impact Report and is, therefore, categoricall; uxempt
from the requirement to file an EIR. _~_ RESOLUTION ~~G. PC74-250
~ Y s NOV7, THEREFORE, BE I'1' RESOLVGD that the Anaheim City PLanni~Commission does hereby grant subjecE
Petition Eor V~riAnce, upon tlie follow.ing conditions which are hereby Eound to be a necessa.ry prerequisite to the pro-
posed use of the subject property in order to presetv~: the safety and general welfare oF the Citizens of the City of
Anaheim: ,
1. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans
and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit Nos. 1 and 2.
2. That Condition Na, l, above-mentioned, shall be complied o-iith prior to final
~building and zoning inspections.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTIOIv is signed and epp:oved by me this 23 rd day of December, 1974.
e. ,
C ~AIRMAN ANAHE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
SECRETARY/ANAHEIM CITY PLANN OMMISSION
PR'0 TEM
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
~ ro Tem
I, Aletha H, Bu~gesS,Secretory oE the City Plenning Commission of [he City of Aneheim, do hereby certify thet
the foregaing resolution wns passed and adopted nt a meeting o[ the City Planning Commission ofthe City ot Anoheim,
hald on DeGember 23, 1974, at 2:00 o'clock P.h1., by the following vote oE the members thereoL•
AYES: COL7MISSIONERS: FARANO, GAUER, KING, JOHNSON, MORLEY, TOLAR, HERBST
NOES: COh1h1iSSI0NERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hnve hereunto set my hend ;his 23rd day of December, 1974.
!~e7..dd6C1~G~ ~ "-'S~
SECRETARY/ ANAHEIM CITY PLANNI C MMISSION
PRO TEM
V2-G "2'
RESOLUTION N0. PC74••250