Loading...
PC 74-251R~LUTION N0. PC74-'Ly) ~ ~ • A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNRvG COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEI~l7 THAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE NO. 2661 BE GRANTED WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim did ceceive e verified Petitian for Variance fram ADMINISTRATOR OF VETERAN AFFAIRS, 11000 Wilshire Boulevard, Los Angeles, California 90024 and LYNN E. AND ALYS~N E. TOSSELL, 10?0 irvine, Tustin, Califurnia 92680 (Owners); JEROME J. KOLB, 2487 East Chapman Avenu~, Fu'Ilerton, California g2631 (AgEnt) of certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim,, County of Orange, 5tate of California, described as Lot 48 of Tract No. 2022, as shown on a map thereof recorded in book 58, pages 24 and .'.5, Miscellaneous Maps, records of said Orange County, EXCEPTING THEREFROM the following described property: Beginning at the Northwesterly corner ot said Lot 48, thence South 89~ ~3' ~+7" East along the ~~ortherly line of said lot, a distance of 8.12 feet; thence South 7° 43' 00" West 62.43 feet to the Southwesterly corner of said lct; thence alon3 the Westerly line of said lot North 0° 14' 40" East 62.00 feet to the point of beg+nning ; and WHEREAS, the City.Planning Commission did hold e public hearing et the City Hall in the City of Aneheim on December 23, 19%4, at 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of said public hearing having been duly given es required by 1'aw end in accordence with the provisions o[ the Maheim Municipel Code, Chapter ~$,p3 to hear end cansider evi- dence for and against said praposed variance cuid to investigate end make findings and rernmmer.detions in connectian therewith; and WHEI2EAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigolion, and study made by itself end in its behalf, and after due consideretion of all evidence and reports offered at seid hearing, does find and determine the following Eects: 1. T7iat the petitioner requests a varience from the Anaheim Municipel Code: to estab 1 i sh an escrow office in an existing residence in the RS-7200 Zone, with the following waivers: a. SECTION 18.26.03~ - Permitted uses. (Gffice use not permitted in the RS-7200 Zone b. SECTION 18.26.067.010 - Maximum siqn area. (1 sq. ft. sign permitted; I s. ft. existing) 2. That there are except?onal or eatraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of t}ie property that do not apply generelly to the uraperty or class of use in the same vicinity nnd zone. 3. That the requested verience is necessary fot the preservetion and enjoyment of e substuntial pr~pertq right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone, end denied tu the property in question. 4. Thet the requested verience will not be materielly detrimentel to ihe public welfare or injurious to tiie prop- erty orimprovements in such vicinity end zone in which the property is locnted. 5, That the petitioner stipulated there wou1d be a maximum of two employees. 6. That the signing on the property shall be no greater than that shown on the photo graph accompanying tfie submitted plan, as stipulated to by the petitioner. 7. That the use herein granted shali be for an escrow office only. ~ $, That this variance is granted for a period of one year subject l:o consideration for an additional period of time ac the expiration of the one year period. 9, That three persons appeared in opposition, and one letter of opposition was read at the meeting. -1- RESOLUTION N0, PC7~+-%>1 r j .. tNl'IKUNMtNIHL IMNH~1 f YUK~ FINUINb: That the Director of Development Services has determine3 that the proposed activity falls within the definition of Section 3•Ol, Class 3 of the CiYy of Anaheim Guidelines to the Requirements for an Environmental Impact Report and is, therefore, cateeorically exempt from the requirement to file an EIR. ~~~~ horeby NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the AnaF~eim City Planning Commissior grant subject Petition for Variance, upon the following conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the prcposed use of the subject property in order to preserve the safety and general welfare of che Citizens of the L'ity of Anaheim. 1, That the owner(s) of subject p:~operty shall deed to the City of Anaheim a strip of land 45 feeC in width from the centerline of the street along East Street for street widening pu'rposes. 2, That irash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file with the o;fice of the Director of Public Works. 3, That the existing structure shall be brought up to the minimum standards of the City of Anaheim, including *_he Uniform Building, Plumbing, Electrical, Housing, Mechanical and Fire Codes as adopted by the City of Anaheim. 4. That the owner{s1 of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $2.00 per front foot along East Street for street lighting purposes. 5, That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications on file witF. the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit Nos. 1 an~ 2. 6. That Condition Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4~nd 5, above-mentioned, shall be complied with within a period of 180 days from date hereof, or such further time as the Planning Commission may grant. 7, That there would be a marimum of two employees as stipulated to by the petitioner 8. That the signing on the property shall be no greater than that shown on tfie photograph accompanying the submitted plan, as stipulated to by the petitioner. g. That the use herein granted shall be for an escrow office onl~•. 10. That this Variance is granted for a period of one year subject to consideration for an additional period of time at the expiration of the one year period. THE FOREGO~NG RESOLUTlOt: is signed and approved by thi 2 ay of D~cember, 1974. , MA~ ANAHEIM TY PL NNING COMM'{SSION ATTEST; ~~~ ( ~ ~. SECRETAPROATEMEIM CITY PLANNING COM SION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORAhSE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) ~Pro Tem I, Aletha H. Burgess, Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the Cit~y of Ar.aheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the City Planning Comm~ssion of the City of Anaheim, held on December 23, 1974, at 2:00 o'cloc p.m., by che following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COMM~SSIONERS: GAUER, KING, MORLEY, TOLAR, HERBST NOES: COMMISSIqNERS: NONE ABSE~T: COMMIS5fONERS: FARANO ABSTAIN: COMMISSfONERS: ~OHNSON ~N WITNE55 WHEREdF, I have hereunto set my hand this 23rd day of De emb r, 1974. ~ S CRETARY/ ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING CO ISSION _Z_ PRb TEh~ESOLUTION ~0. PC7 - ~1