PC 74-31~ ~
RESGZUTION N0. 'PC 74-'sl
A RESQiUTION OF THn CITY "r7.~4NNING COMMISS;CON OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
TH4T ?~TITION FOR V~RIANCE N0, 2~68 BE GR~1NfED 'IN PART
WHEREAS, the City PYanning Commission of the C!.ty of Anaheim did receice a verified
retitidn fur Variar.ce fro m LE ROY ar.d SUSAN HEIT[~1EN, 28900 Ironwood, Sur.nymead, Califarnia
52385, Owners; aLEi~ BEiLEh"UMEUR or HENRY M. ROBERTS JR., 9461 Grindlay, Su~tte 206,
Cypress, CaFifornia 90630, Ag~en~s, of certain real property situated in the City of
Anahaim, County of Orange, State of Californie, described as follows:
ParceT 1: The Ees~ 132 feet of the South h~1f of the Southwest quarter oi the Southwest
Guarter af the Suutheast quarter of Section 14, Township 4 South, Range 11 ~dest, in the
Rancho Las Cayates, City of Anshexm, as shown on a map thereof recorded in book 51, page 11,
MisceTlaneoLS Myps, records a.f said Orarege County.
~arceE 2: ~iY vhy: p~rtioa of ~he Scuth h~lf of the Sou~hwest quarter of th~ Sa::thwest
quar~er of th~e Sautl~~.~s~ q4arter of Se~ci'Lat~. Y4, Townshlp 4 Southy RangE 11 West, Satt
Ber.r.3rdino Base a:d MerJdiati, iTi the City of Anaheim, lying East of the Eest line of the
land described ir. the de:-d frcm E, E, I~tiles and wife, ~o Se~~eriano J. F~raz, r~~ord~d
FEbx°,xary 10, ~950, in book l966, page 548, OfEicial Records.
EXCE"rTTNG Th~R£FROM the Esst 132 i~a= thet•eof.
WH~RE~1S, ~he City F':annir.g Coma~issicr, did hoYd a public hearing at the City Ha1I
In the City ~f Auaheim un Fehruaxy 4, 1974~ st 'L:00 o`clock p.m., notice of said publ3c
hearir.g havirg been du3y giveu as required by law ~nd in sccordance with the pravisiona
of the Ar.aheim M~r.~±4ipr~1 Code, Cnspter Y8.68, to hear ~rd cansider evideace for and
agatrst said proposed varisnce ard to irvestigate acd m9ke findings and rec~rymmendal•ione
in connectior. therewith.; and
WhERFAS, said Cc:mnission, ~fce•r due inspect•Ionp investlgat:on, and stsdy made by
i.:seEf ar_d ir. its behaYf~ znd aPter due cor_eideration of ,all ~vide~ce and repcrts uffered
s~ 3a~d hearir.g, daeb fLnd aad d2termir_e the f~IEowiag facts:
1~ ihat the petitioner reque~ts vaz•iances from tre Ansha•_m tiuricipal Code, as
faTSaws, 4~ es~ablish a two-story, 45-u~it apartment compiex:
a, ~i:TTON F8.28,Oi0(5-b) - Maximum he!gh~ within Y50 feet of av~v siag4e-
familv residentiaP zaae. Y-stor perm'!tted;
2-story propased)
o. SECTTON ?d.28.056(6-b-E) - Mirims:m ~aa•rd snd bu3.?.d~?ng setback. (16 feet,
22 feet snd 26 feeC r.•equired- 7 feet 5 ir.chee,
8 feet and YO feeC proposed)
c, SECTION 1$.28~050 7-a - Minimum distance_betweer buildings. 20 Eeet
and 25 feet requiced; 10 feet, 20_feet. a.~d 22 feet
prepused)
d. SECTION 18.Y8.050(7-d) -~lirimcat~rldth uf pedestr.zar. acr.esswric~ .
e. SECTTON T8,28.050'10~a - Minimum off-street psrking spsces. (85 parki~c3
spacES requ3red; 68 spaces propased)
f. SECTION 16.2d,050 lY - WsFls adi~cent to R-A sr.d si<< ie~familv__~_z___~a•~~.esW
2, That Waiver l~a, abo~ve-mer~ioned, is hEreby granted on th.e baeis tY.~~~: the r~ ueated
w5iv2r, as it pertained to sing'Pe-fami~y resider.tiaT properties lo:.ated south af BaIY Road
adjacent to subjcct progerty, was d~termiced to be dim~niinus as an arterial h3~hway
separated that property from t}~e subject developmant; that the adjs~ent R-A properties
were designated or. the Anahe±m General Plan for mult3ple-family r~eiden~~al u3e; and that
the pEtitioner stlpu4ated to epimin~tir.g any second floor units within 1~0 feet of the
r~ingle-famiYy residential propertiee to the north.
3. That Waivets?-b ar.d 1-c, abuve-mentior.ed, are hereby granted due to tYe design
concept and the size of the property being developed.
V1-G _1- ' RESOLU'P~ON N0. FC 74-3L
~: ~ ~
4. That WaivEr T-d, above-mentioned wbs eliminated with revised plsrs submitted by
ti:e petitia::er,
5. That Weiv~>:r f-e, above-merrtioned, was withdrawn by the petitinner since the
Y4~nning Cocr~cniss:ion determineii that the family rooms, being 50 pereent opea along the
waEl of the adj~r;~~ing, living room, were considered to be a part of the livlag room a:~d
n~~ cazsidered a bedroum fo: the purposes oi interpr.eting park3.ng reqc:irements.
6, That W~iver Y-f, abav2-mentioned, was withdrawn by the petitioner as indicated
by the revised plans wherein a carport waJll, in lieu of a block wall along the east
property litte end a 6-faot high bYock aaYl a7.ong the north property line are being
pr~vLded.
7. That it was determir_ed that a 20-foot wide landscape strip should be provided
aYo~eg the narth prcperty Sine, in conjunction with the requi*ed 6-foot h;gh masonry wal5.,
~o proper'~y buffer the ad~ac~ent sing£e-family residential prapertie~.
8, That there are excepCier.al or extraordinary circumstaaces or coadition.s applicable
ta the property involved ar ta ~he intended use, as grarted, of the praperty that de not
eppZy gener2liy L~a the prupar`y ar class of use in the same vicinity and zcr.e.
9. That tFe requested vaziance, as gracz~ed, is necessary far the pret~ervakion ar.d
enjoymrnt of a substantial proper~y r•Lght possessed bv cther properCy in ~he same vi~i:~ity
~nd zane, and deuied to the praperty in questior..
10. Taa~ the requ~e~ted variar~ce, as grar.tec3, will r.ot be materially 3etrimental
to the pubZic weYfar~e ar in~u.~ious to tha praperty or improvements in such viciaity a,.d
zorc2 in which the pr.aperCy is Yocated~
PY. Pha~ eig::'c ptrsa::s appeared, represar..ing spproximate3y 23 persons present at
said pubiz.. hearlr:g iii opposl~iaa to subjec~ p~tition.
ENVTRONMFNT9`= I~L'~CT RG'OORT FINVING:
Th~~ the Plarnir.g Commissicit, ln r.an:e~:ction wiCh an Exemptiatt Lea4aration Ststus requ~st,
fi:~us ar.d determir.es that the propoueS would have no significant er~iror.mer.tal impsct
end, therefore, r~e~ammends to Che C~.ty CouncfY tha4 no Er.vf•ranmer.~a1 Impact Statemeei~.
is re~essary.
NOW, THEREFOREy BE IT RESOI.VEL' that the An~h2im City Yla,~ing Comnisefon daes
hereby grent in patt subj~ct Petition for Variance, upon the follawLng condition~ which
are hereoy f.a~rd to 6e a iiecess9ry prerequisite to the proposed use of the subjec~ praper~y
in order tJ preserve the safety ar.d general welfare of the Ci~izers of the CiCy of Anaheim;
Y~ That this variance is grsnted subject Ca the comFletian oF Reclassifi~cstion
No, 73-74-29>
2. That subJect praperty shs5.1 be developed substantially in eccorda:ce with pEars
and spECif3.~sC;io'ics or file with tha City of Anaheim maxked Exhibit Nos, Y, 2, 3 and 4(aY~
revision No, Y}; pracided, hawever, that a 20-foot wide Pand~cape sCrip~ in conj~~~rt-ien
wlth the requirad 6•fuot masor.ry walY, shall be pruvided alo.g the :.ar~h proper2y L~:ie.
TEL FOR~GOING RESO~U'T'ION ia signad ar,d approv2d by me thYS fcurth dsy of Febr;;.~ryy
Y974.
~~~~-,~ ::.:~~~ -
CH~IRMAN ANAY:EiM CIfiY F'L~IvN_T~G COM27ISS'~Od
ATTEST:
~~~~~~~~
SECRETARY AI~AHEl~i CIPY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFQFNTA)
COL'hTY ~F ORANCE ) as.
CITY OF ANAhETM )
V2aG ~2- RESOLL'TTUA' N0. 7^ 74-3Y
~~ ~ ~
I, Patricia B. Scanlan, Secre:ary of the City Planning Commission of the City
of Anaheim, do herehy certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at
a meeting of the City Plan~ing Commission of the City of Anaheim, held on February 4,
1974, at 2:00 o`clock p.m., by the following vote of the membera thereof:
1974.
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: FARANO, JOHNSON, KING, GAUER
NOES: COt~L~1ISSI0NERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: HERBST
INWITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set m,y hand this fourth day of February,
V3-G
~~ ~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY~NING COMMISSION
-3- RESOLUTION N0, PC 7k-31