PC 74-4RESOLUTI~C• P~~~~4 ~
A RESO[.UTIOV OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE C1TY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE N0. 2571 BE DETIED
W[ieREAS„ the City Flanning Commission of the City of Maheim did receive a verified Petition for Variance from
MRCHAEL AND GERA~.DINE FARttiADY', 6872 Via Sola Circle, @uena Park, California 90620,
Own~r of certain real prop~erty situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange,
State of Caldfornia described as That portion of the Northeast quarter of the Wortheast
a~arter of Se:tion 15~ Townsh~p 4 South, Range 11 West, Rancho Los Coyotes, as per Map
recorded in Eook 5'n Page 11 0£ Miscellaneous Maps, in the office of the County Recorder
o: said County, described as follows: Beg~nning at the Southeast cor'ner of lot 31 of Tract
No. ?826, as shown on a Map 'thereof recorded ~~ Book 85, Pages 37 to 42, inclusive of Mis-
cellanaous Maps, recC~'ds of said Orange County and running thence North 89° 37' 25" East
~long fhP Sou'[h line uf said Northeast quarter of the said Northeast quarter; thence North
0° 16' 15" West along the Westerly line of said Ea<_terly 630.00 feet, 134.00 feet to an
intersection with the Easterly prolongation of the centerline of Via Sola .Circle as said
screet is shown on sa~d Map of Tract No. 2528; thence South 89° 3i' 25" West along said
Ea~terly prolo^gation 33.62 feet to a point in the Easterly line of said Tract No. 2826;
tnence South 0° 16' 18" East along said Eastc:rly line, 134.00 feet to the point of be-
g;nnirg
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public tcaring at Qie City Hall in thc City of Anahcim on
J anua ry 7, 197~t , at 2:00 o'clock p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by Saw and
in accordance with the provisions of the Maheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.68, to hear and considee evidence for and against said
proposed variance and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation, and study made by itself and in its behalf, and aftcr duc
consideration of all evidence and reports oCPered at said hearing, dces find and determine thc Collowing facts:
i. That the petitioner requcsts variances from the Anaheim Municipal Code, as follows, to permit
a mobilehome on an R-A zoned aCrip of land in con~unction with an existing sing].e-family
residence located in Che City of Buena Park:
a. SECTION 18.16.030 - Permitted uses. f,Mobilehome not pe:mitted on R-A
lot; mobile.home proposed on R-A lot in conjunction
wiCh aiiigle-£amily residence)
b, SGCTION 18.16.050(2-a)_ - Minimum lot area. (1 acre required; 0.1 acre propr
poaed)
c. SECTIQN 18.16.050(2-b) - Minimum l.~t width. (140 feet required; 33.6 f=et
proposed)
d. SECTION 18.16.050(3) - Minimum floor area. (1225 aquare feet required;
400 aquare foot mobilehome proposed)
e. SECTION 18.1Fi.U50(4-b) - Maximum buildin~heiKht. (2.5 feet permitted; 5 feet
- proposed)
f. SECTION 18.1ti.050(5-b) - Minimum side vard setback. (10 fe0t requi•red; 3 to
~ 5 feeL• proprsed)
g. SECTION 18.16.QS0(8) - Rr_quired off-s:.reet parking. (2 spaces required;
no apaces proposed)
2, That there are no exceptional or extreordinary circumstances or conditions appli-
cable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property thaC do not apply
generally to the property or ~lass of use in the same vicini`.y and zonro,
3. Thet the requested variar.ce is not necessary for the preservaCion ar.d enjoyment of
a substantial prop~rty right possessed by ather property in the same vicinity and zone, and
denied to the propetty in question. RE501_UTION N0. PG74-4
V]-D - 1 -
DEV-66•E
~ ~ ~.
4. That the requested vsriance will '~e materially detrimental to the public
:~ei;.are or injurfcus to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which
:he property is located.
5. That Waiver 1-a, abcve-mertioned, is hereby deni=d on the basi.s that, if ap-
proved, subject use would set an unde~irable precedent for fu:ure similar requests; and,
furch•er, that the petitioner did not prove a hardship would result if suhject petition
were not granted, except that which would be of his own making.
6. That three persons indicated their presence at said public hearinn in opposi-
sion [o sub~ect pecition, who were residents of tiie f.ity of Buena Park; and that a letter
was filed by che City of Buena Park in opposition to subject petition.
7. That the petirioner expressed a desire for the City of Anat~eim to deannex
subject property to the City ~f Buena Park, since sub}ect property adjoins the parcel of
land on which his residence is situated ir the City oi Buena Park.
NOW; THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVEL that the Anaheim City Plann.ing Commission does
herehy deny subject Petition for Variance on the basis of the aforementioned findings.
BE IT FURTNER RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Qlanning Commission does hereby
recomn:end to the Anaheim City Council r.hat consideration be given to deannexing the
propercy which is the subject of this Resolution to the City of Buena Park.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 7th day of. January, 1974.
CHA RMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSI
i:': TEST
~~' "'~~
SECRETARY ANAHGIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATG Or CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANANEIM }
I, Putricia B. Scanlan, Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the City of
Anaheim, do hereby certifv thaL the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a
meeting of the Cicy Planning CosimissLon of the CiCy of Anahei~, held on January 7, 1974,
at 2:00 o'clock p.m., by che folluwiti3 vute of the members thereof:
A1ES: COr1MISS16NER5: FARANO, HERFiST, KING, SEYMOUfi, GAUER,
NOES: COI~IISSIONERS: NONE.
ABSFNT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE,
IN k'ITNESS WtiEREOP, I heve hereunCo set my hand this >th d2y of January, 1974.
~r.:~:,~~C_3. ~~-~.~.~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMIS5l4y
.,2_
RESOLUTION N0. PC74-4