PC 74-61~ ~ RESOLpTION~ P~~4-61 ~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CIT~' OF ANAFiEIM
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF 3H 4-41 ~F AYYRO EDHAT
PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION N0. BE '
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Maheim did ceceive a verified Petition Eor Re-
classificacion fcom J~JYZELLE V, RINKER, 2121 Alga Road, Carlsbad, California 92008, Ownery
Morris N. Gregory, 747 Coastviev Drive, Laguna, California 92651, Agezt, of certain
real property describad as follows:
All that certain land situated in the State of Caliiorzia, County of Orange, des~ribed
as follows:
Lor 130 of Tract No. 4181, as shown on ~ Map recorded in bool! 156, pages 21, 22 ard 23
of ~iiscellaneous Maps, records of Orange County, California. ,
; and
WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City Hall in the City of Anaheim
~~ Ma rch 18, 1974, at 2:00 o'clock P.M. notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by
law and in accocdence with tha provisions oE the Maheim Municipal Code, Chaptcr 18.72, to hear and consider
ev~denc~ for and against said proposed ceclessification end to investigete endmake findings endrecommendations
in connection thecewith; and
14HEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigetion, end study made by itself and in its be-
h~lE, and •aiter due consideration oE all evidence end cepoct~ offered at said hearing, does finn and determine the
(ollowing facts:
1. That the petitioner proposes e reclassification of the ebove described pcoperty fcom the R-A,
AGRSCULTURAI ZONE to the C-1 GENERAL COMMEFCIAL ZONE.
2. That the proposed reclassification is in confonnance with the land use deaigna~
r.ioci of the Anaheim General Plan.
3, That it was determined that a 20-foot wide landscape strio, s4ould be prcvi.ded
~r the north and east property lines to serve as a buffet• to the adjoining single-iam~IYy
resiaer.tial properties.
4. That it was determined that adequate safeguards should be provided to further
protect the Yiving environment of the adjoining single-family residential properties fra:n
commercial developti~«.• ~ or. che subject prr_.~erty. •
S. That the Pianning Commission recommendation fcr C-1 zor,ing sho~S.d be made sut~ject
to submission of ~recise plans and approval thereuf by the Plsnning Cnmmission priur to
the introduction of an ordinance rezoning subject property.
6. That the proposed reclassificatior. of subject property is r.ecessary and/or
desirable for the orderly and proper development of tlie community.
7. That the proposed reclassification af subject property does properly re4ate ta
the zones and their permitted uses locally estaUYished in c3.ose proximity to subject
~roperty and to the zones and their permitted uses generaY'Ly estabTished throug`~aut the
community.
8. Th~t two letters were received from nearby property uwners, one in appositiun
to subject reclassification.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FINDING:
Tha~ the Plam~iag ('omicLssion re:ommends to the City Ccuncil that th~ scbject groject be
exempted from the requirement to prepare an ~nvironmental Impact Report pursuant r.u Che
provisions of the California Environmenl•al Quality Act.
~_1 -1- RESOLUTION N0. PC 74'-6I
- NOW, THnREFORE, BE ~RESOLVED that the Anaheim Cit anning Commission does hereb~ ~
"recemmend tu the City Coiincil of the ~ity of Anaheim that su ~ect Petition for Reclassifica-
tian be approved and, by so ~oing, that Title 18-Zoning of the P.naheim Municipal Code bE
amended to axclude the above described property from the R-A AGRICULTURAL, ZONE and to
incorporate said described property into the C-1 GE~ERAL COTR4ERCIAL; ZONE upon the
followiag conditiotts wbich are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed
use of. subject property in order to preserve the ssfety and general ~el£are of the Citizens
of the City of Anaheim:
I. That street lighting facilities along Orangethorpe Avenue and Post Lane shall
be installed as required by the Director of Public Utilities an~ in accordance with standard
plans and specifications on file in the office of the Director of Pub~ic Utilities; ar.d
that a bond in an amount and forc~ satisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall be posted with
the City to guarantee the installation of the above-mentioned requirem~nts.
2. That 15-gallon size Magnolia trees shall be planted in the parkway along Orange-
thorpe Avenue, evenly spaced along the frontage and planted in the parkway area cr in tree
wei4s as approved by the Superintendent of Parkway Maintenanee, City of ~nahefm.
3, That damaged ~nd/or hazardous sidewallcs shall be repaired along Post Lane as
re~uired by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifi~ations on
fiYe in the office of the City Engineer.
4. That trbsh st~~rage areas shall be provided in accordance ~iL•h approvad pl~ns
on Eile with the office of the Director of Public Works.
5. That fire hydrants shall be installed and charged as required and determined
to be necessary Uy the Chief oi the Fire Department prior to commencemenc of structural
freming.
6, That all air-conditioning facilities shall be properly shielded from view and
the suund buffered from adjacent properties.
7. That subject property shall be served by underground utilities,
8. That a 6-foot masonry wall shall be constructed along the east and north pruperty
.lines.
9. That any psrking area lighting proposed shall be down-lighting frum s maximum
heighc of 6 feet, which lighting shall be directed away from the property lines to prot~ct
the residential integrity of the area.
P0. That drainage of subject property shall be disposed of in a manner satisfaetory
to the City Engineer.
11. That prior to introduction oP nn ordinance rezoning subject property, precise
plans shall be suomitted to and approved by the Planning Co~issior., said plans to provide
a 20-foot w•ide landscape strip at the north and east property lines.
y2. Prior to the introduction of an ordinance rezoning subject property, Cor.ditions
No, 1 and No. 11, above-mentioned, shall be completed. The provisions or rights granted
by ~h:s rasolution sha11 become null and void by action of the City Council unYess said
conditiuns are complied with withfn one year from the date hereof, or such further time
ss tF.e City Council oay grant.
13. That Conditions Nos. 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10, above-mentioned, shaYT be
compYied with prior to final building &nd zoning inspectione.
THE PORFGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 18th d~y of March, Y974.
„r,.~~le ~
CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLAh'IQING CO:~AIISSI
AT
~-~"J___-~J~L' t?.2ti~
SECRETARY ANAHFIM C~ PI.ANDIING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORidIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) es
CTTY OF AN.~HEIM )
I, Patricia B. Scanlan, Secretary of the City Plannfng Coa~nission of the City of Anaheim,
do hereby certify that the foregoing resrlution was ~asaed and admpted at a meeting of
the City Planning Cownission of the City o£ Anaheim, held on March Y8, 197~+, at 2:00 a'cYack
p.m., by tl~~e following vote of the membe~s thereof:
AYES: COMMiSSIONERS: COriPTON, FARANO, HERBSTr JOHNSON, KING, MORI,EY, GAUER
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NUNE
IN WITNESS WHEREOF; I have hereunto set my and this 18th day of March, T974.
-~~.~~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY Pt.ANNING CGMMISSION
R2-A -2- RESOLUTION N0. PCi4-61