PC 75-103f ..r ~ ~
RE~OLU7ION Nfi, PC75-103
A RESOLUTICN `J~ THE CITY ?LHNNING COMMISSIi'~: OF ?HF L'iTl OF ANAHEIM
THP.T PETI?I(?N FOR '1l~Ri~h+CE N0. ~69~ BE GRANTED.
'„i?'F,`•'~;~'.'s, [Siz C:~E"f Plannina Comm~.;:sioi? ~~. ~:'s~e City of knaheim did receive a
~er:fira~ ~?t;S-; civn Fc~' 'l:r~dance from '''".i1Nlf :-. - tc~D, 423 South :•rookhurst Street,
Anaheim, C::?:'`ta~"s~ 3't+1o?~ ;Owner) ~;r cert~' •, real propeP?',~ s±tuated in tne CiLy
of Anaheim; Cuvn~y a7 G.~tir;Y;;;, ;;.;c,,.e of ~a;.: Fc?rr~ia, der.cr'sbed ~s Lot No. ~1 oT
T;~ct No~ 79.~9 ?S recorded isa L+x:~;t 82, prs,c_Y~ 8-)0 0.` =" _=':~Elaneous Mag": :~~~ the
aff iG~ ~?{ the fovnty Recorder o'd :;r; ; d co~>+ .•; ;,:' ~
WH@REAS, the City Planning Commi~,s:;r~n di~;i hoR:•~ ~' ':ht.>;-'T:;.•:':s;,y at the City
Hall in the City of Anaheim on May 12, ?;;'7S. :]*. },:~, .;. _, n:;+_':~~~° of said public
hearing having been duly giveri as requir~ti by law ;c-:r..~ 'sn ac~ord~t%:+r:.e with the
provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, ;,hapter 1t3.03~ to hear and consider
evidence for and against said ~+roposed variance and to investigate and make
findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and '
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study
made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence
and reports offered at said hearing, does find and determine the following
facts:
1. That the peYitioner requests the following waivers from the Anaheim
Municipal Code, to permit an existing block wall and lanai in the RS-7200 Zone:
(a) SECTION 18.04.043.101 - Maximum wall heiqht. (42 inches permitted;
70 inches existing)
(b) SECTION 18.26.066.011 - Minimum number of e~closed parkina spaces.
2 spaces required; 1 s ace existing)
2. That Waiver 1-a, above-mentioned, is hereby granted on the basis that
similar walls exist in the subject area.
3. That Waiver 1-b, above-mentioned, is hereby granted on the basis that the
remodeling of subject garage, thereby reducing the n~mber of enclosed parking spaces
from two to one, apparently occured prior to the current Code requirement that two
enclosed parking spaces be provided.
4. That there are• exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions
applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do
not apply 9enerally to the property or class of use in the same vicinity and zone.
5. That the requested variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment
of a substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and
zone, and denied to the property in question.
6, That the requested variance will not be mat•~rially detrimental to the pu:,lic
welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in
which the property is located.
7, That no one indicated their presence at said public hearing in opposition, and
no coriespondence was received .in opposition to subject petition.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPA~T REPORT FINDING:
That the Director of the Development Services Department has determined that the
proposed activity falls .•:;thin the definition of Section 3.01, Class 5, of the City of
Anaheim Guidelines to the Requirements for an Environmental Impact Report and is,
ttierefore, categorically exempt from the requirement to file an EIR.
RESOLUTION N0. PC75-1o3
..- ~ ' '' ~ ~
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does
hereby grant subject Petition for Variance, upon the following conditions which are
her2by found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the subject
property in order to preserve the safety and general welfare of the Citizens of the
City of Anaheirtr.
1, That the existing structure shall be brought up to the minimum standards of
the City of Anaheim, including the Uniform Building, Plumbing, Electrical, Housing,
Mechanical and Fire Codes as adopted by the City of Anaheim.
2, That plans be submitted to the Building Division and that Building and
Electrical permits be obtained.
3, That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with
plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked Fxhibit No. 1.
4. That Condition Nos. 1, 2, and 3, above-mentioned, shal~~ be completed within
sixty (60) days of the date of approval or such further time as the Planning Commission
may grant.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is si9ned and approved by me this 12th Gay ~` "lay, 1975.
CHAI MAN, ANA EIM ITY PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
~~~ ~
SECRETARY, A~AHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSiON
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Patricia B. Scanlan, Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the City of
Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a
meeting of the City Planning Cortmission of the City of Anaheim, held on May 12, 1975,
at 1:30 p.m., by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: FARANO, GAUER, JOHNSQ4, KING, MORLEY, TOLAR, HERBST
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
IN WI7NESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 12th day of May,1975.
~ ' ~e~~.~
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
_2_ RESOLUTION N0. PC75-103