PC 75-108~ ~
RESOLUTION N0. PC75-108
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COPIMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE N0. 2566 BE GRANTED.
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim did receive a
verified Petition for Variance from ANAHEIM HILLS, INC./TEXACO VENTURES, INC „
c/o Horst J. Schor, 3a0 Anaheim Hilis Road, Araheim, Ca. 92807 (Owner) of certain
real property sit~ated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California,
described as:
All that certain land situatad in the State of California, Rancho Sanriago
de Santa Ana partially in the City of Anaheim•and partially in the County
of Orange, described as follo~vs:
That portion of the land described in the deed to Anaheim Hills, Inc. , a
C;alifornia corporation, recorded July 28, 1971, as Instrument No. 24876,
in Book 9738 , Faoe 562 of Official Records , in the o£~ce of the County
Recorder of said County , described as follows:
Proposed Tract No. 8520, being a Subdivision of tn~~ following:
Beginning at a poir.t in the \orthwesterly line o'' that ePrtain land allotted
to Benjamin and Thomas Flint and Llewellyn Bixby in the Par:ition of the.
Rancho Santiago de Santa Ana, distant thereon \orth 35° 50' 38" East,
3341.66 feet from the Northeast corner of the land described in tha 3eed •
to Santiago Earmers Association, recorded in Book 98, Page 544 of Deeds,
in the office of the County Recorder of Los Aiigeles Counry, California;
thence lpaving said Northwesterly line North 54° 09' 22" ~Vest, 1534.53
feet to the true point of beginnin~ of the land herein described, said
true point of beginning being the Southeasterly terminus of a non-tangent
curve concave Northeasterly and havino a radius uf 500.00 feet, a radial
line of said curve bears South 64° 47' 16" ~Vest, through s4id point; thence
Northeriy along said curve through a central angle of 25° S8' S0" an arc
distance of 223.81 feet; thence tangent North 00° 26' 06" East, 391.42 feet
to a tangent curve concave Southwesterly and hzving a radius of 500.00 feet;
thence IQorth~vesterly along said curve through a ceniral an~le of 28° 39' 29"
an arc distance of 250.09 feet; thence North 75° Z1' 42" ~ast, 414.61 feet to
a point in the Southwesterly line of Track N~. 8075 as recorded in Book 354,
P~ges 4 through 10 inclusive ofl~tiscellaneous tiTaps, records of Orange
County; thence alon~ the boundary of said'~ract \To. 5075 the iG110Wi11a .
courses South 31° 50' 33" East, 30.8? feet; South i5° 03' ~7" East, 77.62 feet;
North 11° 18' 36" East, 331.~4 feet; North S6° 09' 07" East, 389.47 feet; thence
leavina the boundar}~ of said Tract No. 8075 South 09°. 52' 23" East, 80.83
feet: thence North 81° 08' 11" East, 185.00 feet; tnei:ce 5outh 33° 18' 12"
East, 290.00 feet: khence South 08° 07' 00" ~ast, 130.00 feet; thence South
81° 53' 00" tiVest, 112.00 feet to the be~inn'ing of a tangent curve concave
Soutiieasterly and having a:adius of 375.00 feet; thence S~uth~vesterly alona
said curve throu~h a central angle of 26° 48' 00" an arc distance of 175.41
feet; thence tangent to said curve 5outh 55° 0~' 00" SVest, 335.48 feet to the
beo nnin~ of u tangent curve concave Easterly and Havi•ng a radiu~ of 225.00
feet; thence Southerl,y along said curve through a central ~nglc af 84° 29' 00"
RESOLUTION N0. PC75-108
~ - ~ .
an arc distance of 331.77 feet; thence tangent to said curve South
29° 24' 00" East, 4~.51 feet to the be~ nning of n tungent curve concave
:+orthwesterly ans having a radius of 275.OC feet; thencc Southwesterly
along said ~urve through a central anole of 103° 07' 03" an aic distance
of 494.93 feet; thence tangent to said curve South 73° 43' 03" West, ;i03.34
feet to the beginning of a tangent curve coneave Southeasterly and having
a rudius of 18. 00 feet; tnence Southerly along said curve through a central
angle of 93° 38' 28" an arc distance of 29.42 feet; thence radial to said
curve South 70° 04' 35" ZVest, 54.00 fest to the beginning of a non-tangent
curve concave Southwesterly and having u radius of 473.00 feet, a radiai
line through said beginning of curve bears North 70° 04' 35" East; thence
Northwesterly along said curve through a central angie of 05° 17' 19" an
arc distance of 43.66 feet; thence tangent to said curve North 25° 12' 44"
~1Test, 270.00 feet; thence Nortki 64° 4?' 16" East, 27.00 feet alonp a radial
line to the true point ef beginning; and
WHEREAS, the City Pl.anning Commission did schedule a public hearing at the
City Hall iri the City of Anaheim on December 10, 1973, at 2:00 p.m., notice of
said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance
with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.03, to hear and
consider evidence ror and against said proposed,variance and to investiga~e and
make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; said public hearing
having been continued to the Planning Commission meeting of May 28, 1975; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due insoection, investigation and study made
by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration oF all evidence and
reports offered at said hearing, does find and•determine the fo9lowing facts:
1, That the petitioner requests the following waiver from•the Anaheim '
Municipal Code, to construct an 18-lot, RS-HS-22,OOO.subdivision:
SECTION 1~.23.065.010 - Requirenent that sinqle-family structures rear
on arterial hiqhways. (5 lots proposed to front
on an arterial highway)
2, That the above-mentioned waiver is hereby, granted on the basis that the
hillside topography and large lot sizes justify deviation from the "flat land"
development standards as delineated in the RS-HS-22,000 Zone.
3, That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions
applicai:~e to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do
not appPy 3enerally to the property or class of use in the same vicinity and zone.
4. That the requested variance is n~:cessary for the preservation and enjoyment
of a subs*_antial property right possessed by other property,in the same vicinity and
zone, and denied to the property in question. .
5. That the requested variance will not be materially detrimental to the public
welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in
which the property is located, ,
6. That no one indicated their presence at said public hearing in oppos~tion,
and no correspondence was received in opposition to subject variance.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FINDING; •
That E~vironmental Impact Report No. 111, suppl.ementing master EIR No. 0, having
been considered this date by the City Planning Commission and evidence, bo~h written
and oral, having been presented to supplement the draft of EIR No. 111, the City
Planning Commission believes that said dr.aft EIR No. 111 does conform to the City and
State Guidelines.and the State of California Environmental Quality Act and, based upon
such information, does hereby recommend to the City Council that they certify said
EIR No..lll is in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act,
-2-
RESOLUTiOh N0. PC75-108
~ ~
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED tha~ the Anaheim City Planning Commission does
hereby grant subject Petition for Variance, upon the followin9 conditions which are
hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the subject
property in order to preserve the safety and 9en~ral welfare ~f the Citizens of the
City of Anaheim:
1. That this Variance 9s granted subject to the completion of Reciassification
No. 73-74-28, now pending. •
2. That subjecr property shall be ds.veloped substantially in accordance with
plans and spec+fications on file with the City of Anaheim marked Exhtbit No..l.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by rt~e this 2Sth day of May, 1975.
~ AIRMAN, 11 C PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST: .
(~~~.~~~~~
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNI~G COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF'ANAHEIM )
I,,Patricia B. Scanlan, Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the City uf
Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a
meeting of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, held on May 28, 1975,
at 1:30 p.n:,, by the folloWi~g vote of the members thereof:
AYES: ~ COMMISSIONERS: GAUER, KiNG, MORLEY, TOLAR, HERBST
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: FARANO, JOHNSON '
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 28th day of M3y, 1975.
, ~~~t~.~
' SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PlANNING COMMISSION
-3-
RESOLUTION N0. FC75-108