PC 75-110~ ~
RE50LUTION N0, PC75-110
A RESOLU~IO;J CF THE CIT7 PLANNIN6 COMMISSiu;~ Of THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ~kAT PETITION
FOR RECLASSIFICATION N0. 74-75-33 BE APPROVED.
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commiss"ron of the City of Anaheim a'id feceive
a verified Petition for Reclassification from RO~ERT S, BEASLEY, 1336 Beneddct
Canyon Drive, Beverly Hills, Ca. 9021~ (Ow~er); P. J. HALLMEYER, 1304 South
Magnolia Avenue, Anaheim, Ca, 92804 {Agen*.) of certain real pro~perty situated
in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State ofi Califonnia, described as:
The West 82-1/~ feet of the East 247-1/2 `Eeet of the Northa~zst Quarter of the
Northwest Quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 2;, Township 4 South,
Range 11 West, in the City of Anaheim, S.B.B. '& M. ~
EXCEPTING THEREFROM the North 396 feet; and
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commissio~ did schedwle a publac hearing at the .
City Hall in the City of Anaheim o~ May 28, 1975, a,~ 1:30 p,m., notice oF.said
public hsaring having been duly given as required ~by la~ and in accordance with
the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal,Code, Chapter 18.03, to hear,a~d consider
evidence for and against said proposed reclassification and to inves~i;gar.+,; a~d
make findin9s and recommendations in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, im~est~gation amd study made
by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideratio.n o~ all eviden~e and
reports offered at said hearing, does find and determ'ine the foElowto,g facts:
1. That the petitioner proposes reclassification of Yhe abovc-~escrtbed
property from the RS-A-43,000 (RESIDENTIAL/AGRICULTURAL) ZONE io thc RM-2~00
(RESIDENTIAL, MULTIPLE-FAMILY) ZONE.
2, That the Anaheim General Plan designates subject property for l~w-medium
density residential uses.
3, That the proposed reclassification of subject property is necessary and/or
desirable for the orderly and proper development of the commun.ity.
4. That the proposed reclassification of~subject property does properiy relate
to the zones and their pePmitted uses locaily established in close p~oximity to subject
property and to the zones an~ their permitted uses generally established throughout the
community,
5. That the proposed reclassification of subject property requires the improven~nt
~f abutti~g streets in accordance with the Circulation Element of the General Plan, due
to the anticipated f'ncrease in traffic which will be generated~by the intensificati~n of
land use. .
6. That no one appeared at said public hearing in opposition and ~o correspondence
was received in opposition to subject petitian; however, opposition was present and
correspondence was received in opposition to the variance petition which was submitted
in conjunction with this reclassification petition. .
ENVIRGNMEPJTAL IMPACT REPORT FINDIN6:
That the Planning Comnission recommends to the City Councit that the subject project
be exempt from the requirement to prepare an Environmental Impact Report, pursuant to the
provisions of the California Enviror~mentai Quality Act.
RESOLUTION N0, PC75-i10
~ ~
Fd6W, THEREF6RE, BE iT RESDLVED that the Anaheim City Plannin.q ~i~!nmsss:on does
hereby recommer•,d to the City Cou~~c'i1 oF the City of Anaheim tha2 su~jecs Petitton
for ReclassYfication be approved aa~d~ by so doing,'•that Titl~ )~-zoning af the
Anafi~im Municipal Code be amended to exclude the above-de~eribed 'proper'Ey from the
R5-A-43,000 (RE51L?F.NT~AL/AGRI~If!_TURAL) ZONE nnd te inc~rporate said descrs2~Ed
property into the RM-246J (ftESIOENTIAL, MllLTIPLE-FAMILY) ZONE u~on the following
conditions which are hereby found to b~ a ne~e'ssary prerequisite to k},e proposed
trse of sub~ect ~pe'operty in order to preserve the safety and general welfare of the
Citizens of the City of Hnaheim:
1. That all engfneering requi~ements of the City of Anaheim along Lane.ros~ Drive
Tncluding preparation of improvemen~ plans and installation of all improvements such
as curbs and gutters, sidewalks, street grading an~d pav•ing, drain~9e facilities, or
other ap~urtenant work shall 6e camplierJ with as required by the Ci'Cy Engineer and in
accordance with staadard p'lans and specifications on file in the offece of the City
Engineer; a3~d that a bond in an amount ~nd form satisfactory to the•City of Anaheim
sha91 be posted with the City to guarantee Xhe ~nstal9a*_ion af the above-mentioned
requirements. `,
~ 2. That the awner(s) of subjec't property shall pay to the Cit,y of Anahe?m the
sum of 60S per front foot along Lanerose Drive fo~ tree planting purposes.
3. 7hat trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with app.roved plans
on file wiL~h the of'fice of the Director of Pub1Yc Works.
4. That fire hydrants shall be installed and charged as required.and determined
to be necessary by the Chie~ of the Fire Departm°nt pr;or to comm°ncement of structural
framing.
5; That~subject property sh~`sl be served by underground utilities.
6. That drainage of subject pwnperty.shall be dispossd of in a manner satisfactory
to the City Engineer. ,
7, That the a~dner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the
a'ppropriate park and recreation in-lieu fees as de'termined to be appropriatc by t{ie
City Council, said fees to be paid at the time the building permit is •issued.
8. That appropriate water assessment fees as determined ~y the Director of Public
Utilities shall be paid to the City of Anaheim prior to the issuance af a building permit.
' 9. Prior to the introduction of an ordinance rezoning subject property, Condition
Nos. 1 and 2, above-ment'foned, shall be cumpleted. The provisions or rights grarted by
this resolution shall become null and void by action of the City Council unless said
conditions are complied with within one year from the date hereof, or such further time
as the City Council may grant. ~
10, That Condition Nc~s. 3, 5, and 6, above-mentioned, shall be compli~d with prior
to final building and zoning inspections.
TNE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me ehis 28th day of May, 1975.
~~
RI N, ANA CIT NING COM1115510N
A7TFST:
~~~~ • i2i~~~
SECRE7ARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COf4MIS510N
STATF OF CAIIFORNIA
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM ) ,
I, Patricia B. Scanlan, Secretary of the City Pianning Commission of the C'sty of
Anahetm, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a
meeting of the City Planning Commission o4 the City of Anaheim held on May 28, 1975,
at 1:30 p.m., by the following vote of the members thereof: ~
AYES: COMMISSIONERS; GAUER, KING, MORLEY, TOLAR, HERBST
NGES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: JOHNSON
ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: FARl~NO
IN WITNE~S WHEREOF, I have hereuntc se' ny hand this 28t~y of May, 1975.
'~3EL , ~AA~TR~~OTiF~
_2_
... R[SGLUTION N4 PCjS-110