PC 75-125~SOLUTIOi1 N0. PC75-125 ~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CIiY PLANNING C0~4iISSION OF TH~ CITY OF ANAli~I*t
THAT PlTITION FOR CONDITIONAL USI: P~It~[IT N0. 612 {READV~RTISED) Ii~ GRANTED, IN PART.
WNEREAS, The City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim did receive s
verified Petition for Conditional Use Permit from AM~RICA*I BAPTIST CHURCHL'S OF THE
PACIFIC SOUTHWEST, 816 South Figueroa Street, Los Angeles, Ca. 90017 (Owner);
1tEVLR~ND P. MORENO, 1715 West Crone Avenue, Anaheim, Ca. 92Sf14 (Agent) of certain
real property described as:
The easterly 98.08 feet of the south one-third of the east half of that portion of
the southeast quazter of the northeast quarter of Section 17, Township 4 South, Range
10 ~~est, in the Rancho San Juan Ca~on de Santa Ana, City of Ana4eim, County of Orange,
State of California, that is inr.luded within the following described lines:
IIeginnin~ at the northwest corner of the lands formerly of Lumis A. Evans, being a
point on the south line of Broadway, also bein~ a point westerly 660.00 feet, more
or less, from the center line of Euclid; thence south 1320.00 feet to the south line
of said northeast quarter; thence west 990.00 feet to a stake; thence north 1320.00
feet to said south line; thence east 990.00 feet to the point of begix':ning;
EXCEPT any portion thereof which may be included wiChin the southeast quarter of the
southeast quarter of said northeast qua:ter; and
WHERPd+S, the City Planning Commission did sche3ule a public hearing at the City
Hall in the City of Anaheim on June 9, 1975, at 1:30 p.m., notice of said public
liearing having been duly given as required by law and in a~- '•dance witY~ the
prov3sions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.03, t~ .ar ,snd consider evidence
for and against said proposed conditional use and to invesC~gate and malce findings
and reco~endations in connection therewith; said public hearing having been
continued to the Planning Commission meeting of June 23, 1975; and
W1iEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and st,.dy made
by itself and in its behalf, and aftcr due consideration of all evidence and
reports offered at said hearing, does fin~i and determine the following facts:
1. That the proposed use is properly one for which a conditioaal use permit is
authorized by Code Section 1Fi.21.050.110, to wit: construct a churct; sanctuary and
Sunday school classrooms, with waivers of:
1. SECTION 18.04.042.020 - Minimum sidevard setback. (15 feet
required; 5 feet proposed)
b. SECTION 18.04.043 - Permitted encroachments into front yard.
(Church towera not permitted)
c. SECTION 18.21.062.010 - Maximum building hei l~it. 7~ feet
permitted; 20 feet proposed)
d. SECTION 18.21.067.02~ - Maximum sign area. (20 square feet
permitted; 50 square feEt proposed)
2. That Waivers 1-a and 1-b, above-mentioned, are eliminated by the resubmittal
of plans (Exhibit Nos. 1& 2 - Revisioti Nos. 1) and, therefo.re, withdravm by the petitioner.
3. That Waiver 1-c, above-mentioned, is hereUy gxanted on the basis that although
[he adjacent property to the west is zoned residentially, said property is developed
with a church and church school. ,
4. That the petitioner stipulsted to withdrawal of Waiver 1-d, above-mentioned,
and to complying with the maximum permitted sign area.
5. That the petitioner further stipulated to development of the subject proposa.'•. in
conformance with all site development and zoning standards of the underlying zone, with
the exception of the maximum building height as set forth above and, further, to ,
compliance witli the Intcrdepartmental Committee Recommendations.
6. That the Flanning Commission hereby determines that the petitioner shall submit
precise plans for Planning Commission and/or City Council approval prior to the issuance
of builcling permits.
RESOLUTION N0. PC75-125
~ ~
7. Thst the proposed use will not adversely affect the adjoining land uses and
the grocoth and development of the area in whicli it is proposed to be located.
8. That the size and shape of the site proposed for the use is adequate to allow
the full development of the proposed use in a manner not detrimental to the particular
area nor to the peace, health, safety, and general welfare of the Citizens of the City
of Anaheim.
9. That the granting of the Conditional Use Permit under the conditions imposed,
if. any, will nol• be detrimental to the peace, health, safety. and general welfare of
the Citizens of the City of Anaheim. '
10. That two (2) persons appeared at sai3 public hea:ing, representin~ approximately
twenty (20) persons present, in opposition; and a petition containing approximately sixty
(60) signatures in opposition was received.
ENVIRONfiENTAL IDIPACT REPORT FINDI:IG:
That the Planning Cammission reco~ends to the City CounciJ. that the subject pra~ect
os axempt from the requirement to prepare an Environr~ental Impact Report, pursuant to the
vr.ovisions of the California Environmental Quality Act.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Cownission does
hereby grant, in part, subject Petition £or Conditional Use Permit, upon the foiloc?ing
conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the
sub3ect property in order to preserve the safety and general welfare of the Ci~izens of the
City of Anaheim:
1. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on
file with the Office o£ the Director of Public Works, as stipulated to by the petitioner.,
2. ThaC appropriate vater assessment Eees, as determined by the Director of Publi~
Utilities, sUall be paid to the City of Anaheim prior to the issuance of a buildin~ pernit.
3. That subject property shall be served by underground utilities.
4. That drainage of subject pxoperty shall be disposed of in a manner satisfactory to
the City ~ngineer.
5. That precise plans ahall be submitted to the Planning Commissiou and/or City Council
for approval, priox to the issuance of building permits.
6. That Y.he subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans
and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim markel Exhibit Nos. 1 and 2(Revision
No. 1); provided, however, that develapment shall be in confonnance with all site development
and zoning standards of the underlying zone, with the excepCion of the maximum building hei(~ht
permitted under this conditional use permit.
7. That Condition Nos. 1, 3, 4, and 5, above-mentioned, shall be complied with prior to
final building and zoning inspections.
THE FOREGOI:IG RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 23rd day of June, 1975.
CHAI PRO TEMPORL'.
ANAHEIM CITY YLANPIING C02L"fISSION
ATTEST:
~ • ' ' ~ ~~if4~
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
-2-
RESOLUTION N0. PC75-125
~ . ~
STATE OF CALIFOR'VIA )
COUNTX OR OP~vGE )ss.
CITY OF A?7AHEIM )
I, Patricia B. Scanlan, Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the City
of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted
at a meeting of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim held on June 23,
1975, at 1:30 p.m., by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COrP~fISSIONERS: GAUER, JOHNSON, KING MORLEY, TOLAR, FARANO
NO~S: COhL`iISSIO:IERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMFfISSIONERS: HERBST
IN WITNESS WIiEREOF, I have hereta set my hand this 23rd day of June, 1975.
~~~~
~ SECRETARY, AIJAHEIPf CITY PLANNING CO;iMI5SI0N
-3-
RESOLUTION N0. PC75-125