PC 75-134~ ~
RESOLUTION N0. PC75-134
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM THAT
PETTITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION N0. 74-75-39 BE APPROVED.
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim did receive a
verified Petition for fteciassification from JOHN LYLE CANNON, 9052 Imperial Avenue,
Garden Grove, California 92644 (Owner); MIKE CLARK DEVELOPMENT, INC., 3303 Harbor
Boulevard, Suite K-11, Costa Mesa, California 9262fi (Agent) of certain real property
situated in the City of Analtieim, County of Orange, State of California, described as:
The South half of the Southeast quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section 13~
Township 4 South, Range 11 West, San Bernardino Mer~dian, in the city of Anaheim,
according to the official plat thereof.
EXCEPT therefrom, the Westerly 336.00 feet thereof.
ALSO EXCEPT therefrom that portion thereof included within the boundary lines of
Tract No. 2228, as per map recorded in book 69 pages 34 et seq., of Miscellaneous
Maps, in the office of the c~unty recorder of saici county.
ALSO EXCEPT therefrom that Portior thereof lying Easter'ly of the following
described line:
Beginnin~ at a point in the Southerly line of said S~uth half, dis:ant thereon
South 89 59' 15" West, 1G0.00 feet from the Southwest corner of the land
described in that certain deed to Ted F. Koblitz and ~vife, recorded Novamber 3,
1947 in book 159~+ Page 203 of Official Records of said county; thence F~arallel
to the Westerly line of said land of Koblitz, North 0° 09' 30" East to the
Southerly line of Tract No. 2228, hereinbefore mentioned in the second Exception,
above; and
WFIEREAS, the City Planning Commission did,hold a public hearing at the City
Hall in the City of Anaheim on June 23, '"~:, at 1:30 p.m., notice of said public
hearing ha:ving been duly given as requi.ed by law and in accordance with the
provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.03, to hear and consider
evidence for and against said proposed reclassification and to investigate and
make findings and recanmendations in connection therewith; and
WHCREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made
by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and
reports offered at said hearing, does find and determine the following facts:
1. That the petitioner proposes reclassification of the above-described
property from the RS-A-43,000 (RESiDENTIAL/AGRICULTURAL) ZONE to the RM-1200
(MULTIPLE-FAMILY) ZONE.
2. That the Anaheim General Plan designates subject property for medium
density residential uses.
3. 7hat the proposed reclassification of subject property is necessary and/or
desirable for the orderly and proper development of the community.
4. That the proposed reclassification of subject property does properly
relate to the zones and their permitted uses locally established in close proximity
to subject property and to the zones and their permitted uses generally established
throughout the community.
5. That the proposed reclassification of subject property requires the
dedication and improvement of abutting streets in accordance with the Circulation
Element of the General Plan, due Co the anticipated increase in traffic which will
be generated by the intensificatiun of land use.
6. That the petitioner stipulated to relocating/realigning the trash
enclosure areas in conformance with the requiiements of the Streets and Sanitation
Division and to providing said trash enclosure areas in accordance with approved
plans on file with the Office of the Director of Public Works.
RESOLUTION N0. PC75-134
~ ~
~ 7. That the petitioner stipulated to providing dense landscaping along the
nurtherly property line, in addition to a six-foot masonry wall along the north-
erly and westerly property lines.
8. That the petitioner stipulated to providing a minimum oF ten (10) feet
wide by twenty (20) feet long parking >paces within the proposed carports.
9. That one person appeared from the audience to inquire concerning the
subject petition; no ~ne was present in opposition; and no correspondence was
received in opposition to subject petition.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FINDING:
That the Planning Commission recommends to the City Council that the subject
project be exempt from the requirement to prepare an environmental impact report,
pursuant to the prcvisions of the California Environmental Quality Act.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Gommission does
hereby recommend to the City Council of the City of Anaheim that subject Petition
for Reclassification be approved and, by so doing, that Title 18-Zoning of the
Anaheim Municipal Code be amended ta exclude the above-described property from the
RS-A-43,000 (RESIDENTIAL/AGRICULTURAL) ZONE and to incorporaCe said described
property into the RM-1200 (MULTIPLE-FAMILY) ZONE upon the following conditions
which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the propo~ed use of the
subject property in order to preserve the safety and general welfare of the
Citizens of the City of Anaheim:
1. That the owner(s) of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim
a strip of land 53 feet in width from the centerline of the street along Ball Road
for street widening purposes.
2. That all engineering requirements of the City of Anaheim aiong Ball Road,
including preparation of improvement plans and installation of all irnprovements
such as curbs and gutters, sidewaiks, street grading and paving, drainage facili-
ties, or other appurtenant work shall be complied with as required by the City
Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the
Office of the City Engineer and that street lighting,facilities along 6a11 Road
shall be installed as required by the Director of Public Utilities, and in accord-
ance with standard plans and specifications on file in the Office of the Director
of Public Utilities; and that a bond in ar amount and form satisfactory to the
City of Anaheim shall be posted to guarantee the installation of the above-
mentioned requirements.
3. That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim
the sum of 6QC per front foot along Ball Road for tree planting ~urposes.
4. That trash storage areas shall be relocated/realigned in accordance
with the requirements of the Streets and Sanitation Division and provided in
accordance with approved plans on file with the Office of the Director of Public
Works, as stipulated to by the petitioner.
5. That fire hydrants shall be installed and charged as required and deter-
mine~ to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department prior to cummencement
of structural framing.
6. That subject property shall be served by underground utilities.
7. That drainage of s~~bject property shall be disposed of in a marner
satisfactory to the City Engineer.
8. That the ow~er(s) of su6ject proQerty shall pay to the City of Anaheim
the appropriate park and recreation in-lie~ fees as determined to be appropriate
by the City Council, said fees to be paid at the time the building permit is issued.
9. That appropriate water assessment fees as determined by the Director of
P~blic Utilities shall be paid to the City of Anaheim prior to the issuance of a
building permit.
-2- RF.SOLUTION N0. PC75-134
~ ~
I 10. That the interior walis of the proposed carports shall be stuccoed; that
enclosed storage cabinets shall be provided along the rear wall of each carport;
and that adequate bumper guards shall be provided to protect the interior walls of
the proposed carports from damage.
11. That the minimum dimensions of the parking spaces within the proposed
carports shall be ten (10) feet wide by twenty (20) feet long, as stipulated to
by the petitioner.
12. That dense landscaping shall be provided along the northerty property line,
in addition to a six-foot masonry wall along the northerly a~d westerly property
lines.
13• That the subject property shall be developed in accordance with the site
development standards of the underlying zone.
14. Prior to the introduction of an ordinance rezoning subject property,
Condition Nos. 1, 2 ancl 3> above-mentioned, shall be completed. The.provisions
or rights granted by this resolution shall become null and void by action of the
City ~ouncil unless said con~itions are complied with within one year from the
date hereof, or such further time as the City Council may 9rant.
15. That Condition Nos. 4, 6, 7, 10, 11, 12 and 13, above-mentioned, shall
be complied with prior to final building and zoning irsspections.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTI6N is signed and approved by me this 23rc' day of June,
1975.
l
~HAIRMAN PRO TEMPORE
ANAHEIM CITY PLANN~NG COMMISSION
ATTEST:
~iTir-l~1/ .wi ~~ ~ G~%1C~GCL~i~
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Patricia B. Scanlan, Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the
City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and
adoNted at a meeting of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, held
on June 23, 1975, at 1:30 p.m., by the following vote of the members therecf:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: GAUER, JOIiNSOti; KING, MORLEY, TOLAR, FARANO
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: HERBST
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 23rd day of June, 1975.
~ • , ~
SECRFTARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
-3- RESOLUTION N0. PC75-134