PC 75-182~ ~ ~,
RF.SOLIfi'ION N0. PC75-182
A RESOLUTION OF TIiF. CITY Pi.ANNING COD1~1I5SIQN OF Tf~F. CITY OF ANAHEIM1f
THAT PF:TITIO~ FOR VAP.IA,~CF. N0. 2729 BF. DP.NII:D.
tYHiiRT:AS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim did receive a
verified Petition for Variance from GllS MANDAS, Food i.and ~farket, 910 Soutii }iuclid
Street, Anaheim, California 928Q2 (Owner); JOHN RF.F.D HARRIP•tA*:, 5(15 East Commonwealth,
Fullerton, California 92632 (Agent) of certair. real property described as:
The North 13Q.00 feet of Lot 36 in Tract No. 2534, in the city of Anaheim, county
of. Orange, state of California, as per map recorded in book 115, pages 15 and 16
of P1iscellaneous Maps in the office of the county recorder of said coimty.
{VijEREAS, the City Planning Commission did holci a public liearing at the City
Hail in the City of Anaheim on September 3, 1975, at 1:3(1 p,m., notice of said gublic
heasing having been duiy given as renuired by law and in accordance with the
provisions of tlie Anaheim P9unicipal Cnde, .Chapter 13,(13, to hear and consider
evidence for anci agai.nst said proposed variance and to investi~;ate and make f.indings
and recommendations :.t: connection thereiaith; and
WHGREAS, snid Commission, af.ter due inspection, investi~ation and study made
by itself and in its behalf, and after dtie consideration of all evidence and reports
offered at said hearing, does find and determine the following facY.s:
1. That the petitioner reque~ts the following waivers from the Anaheim
Dfunicipal Code, to permit seven (7) existing, free-standing signs:
(a) SECTIOPI 1S.OS.OJ3.021 - idaximum munber of signs. (tlne free-
standing sign permitteci; 7 existin~)
(b) SECTION 1R.05.(193.023 - Permitted sign location. (Atidcile 20~
required; existing signs located
adjacent to ~rorerty line)
(c) SECTION 18.05.093.Q231- Dfinimum distance between si,ns. (3Q0
eet required; approximately 75 feet
an~l 3 feet existing)
2. That Yhe above-mentioned waivers ar~ hereby deniect on the basis that
tlie petitioner did not demonstrate that a hardship would be created if said waivers
were not granted; that any hardship regarding signing on subject property may be
solveci by expanding the existing free-standing sign; that, fiirthermore, approval of
said waivers ~vould set an undesi.rable precedent for future similar reRuests, and that
tlie Planninp Commission has denied similar requests ir. tlie past.
3. Tha*. there are no exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or
conditions applicaule to the property involved or to the intended use of the property
tnat do not apply generally to the prop~rty or class o~ use in the same vicinity and
zone.
4. That the requr;sted variance is not necessary for ths preservation and
enjoyment of a si;3stantial property right possessed by other property in the same
~~icinity and zone, and denied to the property in question.
5. That the requested variance will be materially detrimental to the
puhlic welfare or injurious to the property or zmprovements in such vicinity and zone
in which tihe property is located.
6. That no one indicated their presence at said piiblic hearing,in
opposition; and no correspodence was received in opposition to subject petition.
ENVIRONhfENTAL IhiPACT REPORT FINDITG:
That the Director of the Planning Aepartment has determined that the
proposed activity falls within the de£inition of Section 3.01, Class 11, of the City
of Anaheim Guidelines to the ReRuirernents for an Enviranmental Impact Report, and is,
thereforP, categorically exempt from the requirement to file an EIR.
RESOLUTTQN N0. FC75-182
0
\_J
~
NOIV, TIiF.R]iFORT:y AE IT RF.SOL:~TsD that the Anaheim City Planning Commission
does hereby deny subject Petition f~r Variance on the basis of the aforementione:l
findings. •
1~75.
J,-
, ~;
T[IE FORF.GOING RF:SOI.i1TI0N is signed and approved by me this 3rd day of 5eptember,
1~
CfiA , ANAI~IF:Ih CITY YI.Ab!~?ING C.f1AAfISSION
A1"fF.ST:
~/ • ~ v
SIiCRF.TARY, Ai~NjGItd CSTY PLA:dNING CO?1~1ISSION
STATE OF CAI.IFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORl4~GF. )ss.
CITY OF ANAHF.I~1 )
I, Patricia B. Scanlan, Secretary of the City Planning Commission e£ the
Ci.ty of Anaheim,•do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and
adopted at a meetin~ of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, held on
September 3, 1975, at 1:5~ p.m., by the follotiving vote of. the members thereof:
AYF:S: COMPIISSIONERS: BARNF.S, HERBST, JOHNSON, KING, A10RLEX, TOLAR, FARANO
NOF.S: CO~fi~tISSTONF.RS: NONE
AI3SF.NT: COA4dISSIONERS: NONF.
IN 1VITNF.SS {VIjF.RF.OF, I have hereunto set my hand this 3rd .day of September, 1975.
,~ ' ,e~~~..~.~
SF.CRF:TARY, ANAfIF.IPt CITY PLANi~'ING Cf1MN1ISSI0N
-Z-
RESOLlffION N0. PC75-la2