PC 75-2RESUL~N NU. - p~75-2 - ~__
A RESOI,UTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION 0 5oT8HE CIBEy GRANTEDEI N PART
THAT PETITION FOR CONDITIO'NAL USE PERMIT
WHEREAS, the City Planni~g Commzssion of the City of Aneheim did ceceive a verified Petition for Con-
ditional Use Permit from AtJAH E I M H I LLS, f NC. , AND TEXACO ANAHE I M H I LLS, I NC, , 380 Anahe i m H i 115
Road, Anaheim, California 92807 (Owner); JAMES L. BARISIC, 380 Anaheim Hills Road,
Anaheim, California 92807 (Agent) of certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim,
County of Orange, State of California, described as Parcel 2, as shown on a Map recorded
in book 55, page 21 of Parcel Maps, in the office of the County Recorder of said Orange
County
``v.
; end
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold e public hearing at the City Hall in the City of Aneheim
on Janua ry 6, 1 y75 , et Q:00 o'clock P.M., natice of said public hearing having been duly given
as required by lew end in accordence with tlie provisions o~ the Aneheim Municipal code, Chepter 18,Oj, to hear
end consider evidence for and egainst said proposed cor.ditional use and to investigate and muke findings and
~recommendetions in connection therewith; and
' WHEREAS, said Commission, efter due inspection, in'+estigation, a~d study made b;~ itsell and in its be-
hali, end after due consideretion oE e1: evidence end reportr+ offered at said heering, does find end determine the
follov:ing fects:
1. Thot the proposed use is properly one Eor which a Conditional Use Pecmit is euthocized by Code Section
18.44.050.070, to permit an automobile service station in the CL (Commercial, Limi:ed)
ZONE with waivers of:
a. SECTION 18.05.091.020 - Permitted wall siqnincl. (Service station wall signs
permitted only o~ building walls that most nearly
face the pump islands)
b. SECTION 18.87.03~.072 - Landsca in ad'acent to interior bou~dar 1(nes.
(2 trees required; none proposed
2. That Waiver 1-a, above-mentioned, is hereby granted on the basis that the pump
islands of the proposed service station are not located adjacent to Anaheim Hills R.oad
but, rather, are lacated towards th~: interior of the shopping center.
3, That Waiver 1-b, above-mentioned, is hereby gr'anted conditionally, since the
petitio~er stipulated that 25 trees would be provided or the service station site but not
necessarily on 20-foot centers adjacent to the interior boundary lines as speciFically
required by Code.
4. That it is deter~nined that a service statir~n at the proposed location wouid not
be unreasonable.
5, ThaY the petitiener stipulated that the monument sign indicated on Exhibit 1 of
the submttted plans and located at the southwest corner of the service stat'ion site will
not advertise the service station but will ident,ify the shopping cente~r only.
6. That the proposed use, as gran*_ed, wi'll not adversely af!ect the adJoining land
uses and the growth and development of the area in which it is propo5ed to be lor,ated.
7. That the size and shape of the site preposed for the use, as granted, is adequate
to allow the full development of the proposed use in a manner not detrimental to the,
particular area nor to the peace, health, safety, and general welfare of the Citlzens of the
City of Anaheim. '
8, That the Conditional Use Psrmit, as grsnted, and under the conditions imposed
will not be detrimental to the peace, health, safety, and generaJ welfare of the Citizens of
the City of Anaheim. '
9, That two (2) persons indicated their presence at said public hearing in
opposition, one of whom appeared in opposition; and no correspondence wa5 received in
opposition to subject petition. _1_
RESOLUTION N0. PC75-2
~ ~
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FiNDING:
Since Environmental Impact Report No. 85, was certified by the City C?uncil on January 30,
1973~ and considered in connection with a gradtng pian for the shopptng center•which
included a service st~tion, the Planning Commission believes ihat said draft EIR No. 35
is still in conformance with the City and State Guidelines and the State of California
Environmental Quality Act and, based upon such information does hereby recommend to the
City Council that they reaffirm their original certification that said EIR No. 85 is in
compliance with said Environmental Quality Act,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commiss?on does her~by
grant in part subject Petition for Conditional Use Permit, upon the follow'ng conditions
•-~hich are hereby found te be a necessary prerequfsite to the Froposed use of the subject
prooerty in order to preserve the safety and general welfare of the Cit~tens of the City of
Anaheim:
1. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approve~ plans on
file with the office of the Director of Public Works.
2. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with p~ans
and specifications on file with.the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit Nos, 1, 2, 3 ana 4;
provided, however, that 25 Yrees shall be provided on the service station site, as
stipulated to by the petitioner, said Y~ees to be located subject to approval by the
Developme.nt Services Department; and the mo~ument sign indicated on Exhibit No. 7 at the
southwest corner of tfie service statian site shall not advertise the service si~tion but
shall i~er.tify the shopping center only.
3, That Condition Nos. 1 and 2, above-mentioned, shail be complied with prior to
finai building and zoning inspe..tions.
TfiE FOREGOIN6 RESOLUTION is signed and appr~ved by me this 6th day f January., 1975.
. ~
' AN A I CITY P NNING COM"11~SION
ATTEST:'
~ /`~ 1n G%.i.fiit~".'
SECRETARY ANANEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE Of CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORP.NGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Patricia s. Scanlan, Secretary of thE City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim,
do hereby certtfy that the foregoin9 resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the
City Plannin9 Commission of the City of Anaheim, held on January 6, 1975, at 2:00 o'clock
p.m., by the following vote of the members therof:
AYES: L'OMMISSIONERS: FARAt~O, GP.UER, JONNSON, KING, 140RLEY, TOLAR, HERBST
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT; COMMISSIONERS: NONE
IN WITNESS WfiEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 5th day of January, 1975.
~ ~J,B ~c ~<-~.,
SELRET~aRY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
-Z- RESOLUTION N0. PC%5-2