PC 75-21_.. - - ~ ~
RESOLUTION NO. PC75-Z~
A RESOLUTION OF ~iHE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION F'OR VARIANCE NO. : b66 BE GRANTED
WHEREAS, the City Pl~nning Commission of the City of Anaheim did receive a verified petitian for Vedenca
from TH011AS b HERMINDA R. CASTRO, 1202 Devonshire Itoad, Anaheim, Galifornia 92801 (Owners)
of certain real prcperty situated in the City of An~aheim, County of Orange, State of
California, described as Lot 1, Tract i795, as shown on a map thereof recorded in book 58,
pages 3 and 4, Miscellaneous Maps, records of said Orange County
; and
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public heering et the City Hall in the City of Anaheim
on ~anuary 20, 1975, ef. l; 30 o'clock P.M., notice of said public hearinp, having been duly given as requlred
by lew and ln accordance with !he provisions of the Maheim Municipal Code, Chepter 18,03, to hear and consider evi-
dence for and against seid proposed verience and to investigote end make (indings and recummendations in connection
therewith; end
WHEREAS, said Commission, eEter due inspection, investigation, and stndy made by itself nnd in its behelf,
and ettec due rnnsideration of oll evidence and report; otEered at said hesring, daes find nnd deteemine the tollowing
facts:
1. Thatthepetitionerrequests the following variance from the Anaheim Municipal Code, to
permit an exi,ting fence:
SECTION 18.04.043.101 - Maximum fence heiqht, ( 1 feet permitted; 5 feet existing)
2. That the above-mentioned waiver is hereby granted on the basis Cfiat the property
owners immediately adjacent to the subject property endorsed the subject petition in favor.
3. Tl~at the fence, as constructed, adds beauty and value tc the subject property.
4, That there ere exceptional or extraordinery circumstences or conditions eppli,;eble to the property involved
or to the intended use of the ~+roperty thet do not npply generally to the property or class oE use in E~e same vicinity end
zone.
5, Thet the requested variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment oE a substantiol pn+~ecty right
possessed by cther property in the seme vicinity end zone, end denied to thc property in question,
6, a~~et the requested veriance will nut be materially detrimental :o tlua public welfare or injurious to the prop-
erty or imprave..~ents in such vicinity and zone in which the propertl• is located.
7, That no one indicated their presence at said public hear'iny^ in o,:PosiYion, and no
corresponden~e was received in opposition to subject petition.
ENVIRGNMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FINDING:
That the Director of Development Services has determined that the proposed activity falls
within the definition of Section 3.01, Class 3 of the City of Anaheim GuiGelines to the
Requirements for an Environmental Impact Report and is, therefore. ca:egorically exempt from
the requirement to file an EIR. .1~ DEV-66~C
RESOLUTION N0. PC75-21
.. • - ~ ~
NOW, THEREFORC, BE IT RESOLVED that the Aneheim City Planning Commission docs hereby grant subject
Petition for Varience, upon the following conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequzsite to the pro-
posed use of the subject property :~ ordee to preserve the safety and generel welfare of the Citizans of the City of
Anaheim:
1, That subject property shall be developed substantially in accoo'riance with plans and
specifications on file with the City of Anaheim Rarked Exhibit Nos. l, 2 and 3,
2. That the existing slump-stone and wrought iron fence she,ll be brought up to the
minimum standards of the City of Anaheim Uniform Duilding Code as adop!ed by the City of
P.naheim, prior to final bui)ding ~nd zoning inspections, or within a period of 90 days from
date hereof, whichever occurs first,
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION ie signed and epproved by me this 20th day of ,;anua ry ~ 1975.
r~--
H IRMAN ANAHEI CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
~ • h/. ~' ~ilt.~-CLI.C~
SECRF.TARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) as.
CITY OF ANAHEtM )
I,Patricia B,Scanlan, Secretary ot the City Plannin, Commission of the Ciry of Annheim, do hereby certify thet
the foregoing resolution wns passed ond adopted et n mectine oE thc City Plenning Commission of thc City of Anoheim,
heid on January 20, 19'J$, at ~;jp o'clock P.M., by thc tollowing ~~ote nf thr, membets theteot:
l+YES: COMMISSIONERS: fARANO, GAUER, iCING, MORLEY, TOLAR, NER9ST
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: .10HNSON
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I heve hereunto set my hend this 20th day cf January, l975.
~~ ~~~
SECRETARY ANAHEiM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
V2-G -2-
3ESOLUTION ki1, ~C75-21