PC 75-213~ ~
RF~„~I~7PIdN N0. PC75-213
A F~'SOIZJrION C1F TF~ CITY PLANNING OONA'ffSSION OF TI~ QTY OF ANAHEIM
R[7COM~NDING 'Il~ T!~ CITY ~JNCIL 0~' Tf~ CITY ~' AN1~lEIM i'~AT PETI'PICN
F'OR RDCLTISSIFICA~2dN N0. 75-76-2 SE APP~Q7VID.
WE~F11S, the City Planning Ca~mission of the City of Anaheim did receive a
verifieci Petition for Reclassificati.on fram RAYM761D SPEE~R, 913 Palcana Place,
Fullerton, Cali.forni.a 92635 (Uaner) ; WILLIAP4 C. ifi CUI~AQ-I, 4320 Cat~us Drive,
Newpart Seach, Cali.fornia 92660 (Agant) of certain real progerty situated in the City
of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, de~cril~ed as:
That porticn of allotinent in decree of partiti.on of the Ranctn Carion de Santa Ana,
rewrded in Case No. 1978, of the 17th Judicial District Cau't of Californ9.a, a
certified oopy of which was recorded February 8, 1874, in Book 28, Page 158 of Deed,
in the office of the County Recorder of Ivs Angeles Ca~nty, California, in the City
of Anaheim, County of Orange, California, described as follows:
Parcel 1 as sho4nz on ~ map recorded in Book 30, Pages 48 and 49 of Pareel Maps
pocepti~ there£ran the follaaaing described pm~.sty.
Beginning at the Northeast~sly ~rner of the latrl described in the deed to the State
af California r~ord~ October 30th, 1956 in book 3693, Page 374 of Official Reoox3s
of said oounty arr3 state; thence along the Easterly and Southerly line of sai.d larrl
the following courses; South 5° 38' 16" Fiest 324.54 feet; thence Nca-~lZ 86' 36' 11"
West 14.92 feet to a poizt on the Easterly line of the land describ~i in a deen to
the State of California, recorded October 14th, 1952 in Book 2395, Page 522 of
Official Rewrds of saici county and state; thence along said ~asterly line Sauth 1°
23" 00" West 47.64 feet, t}rnce South g6° 37" 00" Fast 857.17 feet t~o i:he North line
of said parcel 1, thence florth 1° 23' 00" East along said Nortli line 412.10 feet t~o
'the Southc~sly line of a strip of land; 100~00 feet wide, as cor-veyed ~ to the
Riverside, Santa Ana and Los Angeles Railv,ay Ca~y, by deed re~corded July 7, 1886,
in H~ok 1.64, Page 508 of Deeds, Records of Los A~a7eles County Californi.a, said 100.00
foat wide strip being ixxv veste3 in the Atcheson Tapeka azsc?. 3z:r:•ra Fe Railway Co. a
c~xporation, which point is a point on the curve of sai.d ScxYtherly line, ooncave
~rly having a radius of 5779.65 feet, a radial bearing to said point beeirs South
1° 47" 02" East, thence WesterYy along said cun~e thraugh a central angle of 0° 19'
02" an arc- lertgth of 32.OC £eet; thenCe South 88° 32' 00" W~st 787.16 feet to the
point of beginning; arcl
WF~AS, the City Flanning Cartnission did schedule a public hearing at the
City Flall in the City of An~neim on Septant~s 3, 1975, at i:30 p.m., notice of said
public hearin~ having be~n duly given as required by law and in acoordanoe with the
pmvisioms of the Anaheim t~lunicipal Code, Chapter 18.03, to hear and oonsider
evidonce for azrl agains~ sz~id pmPosed reclassification anci to .investiga`ce and make
finli.ngs arrl reoarmerdations s.n oonnection therewith; sai.d public hearing havixig been
oontinued to t2ie Planning Camiission meeting of Oct.ober 29, 1975; a~i
WF~FtF11S, said Catmission, after due ins~ection, investigation and study made
by itself and in its bel~alf, airl after due wnsideration of all evidence and reports
offered at said hearing, does firxl and deternune the follaaing facts:
1. That the petationer proposed a reclassification of the above-described
propert.y £ran the RM-1200(SC) (RESIDENTIAL, MULTIPLE-FAMILY - SCII~IIC OORRIDOR
(7VF32I,AY) ZONE to the Q,(SC) (OONA'~FtCIAL, r.TtrrrmFn - SCE7IC OORRIDOR OVERTAY) ZOI~.
2. That, although the Anaheim General Plan (as ~ner~ied in connection with
Ger-eral Plan Amer~dment No. 122) desiqnates subject property for low-srr.~dium density
residential uses, the proposed zaninq is de~d to be appropri.ate at tYw_ subject
location, and appropriate action wi.ll bp taken tn reflect the change in the larrl use
policy of the Anaheim General Plan.
3. That the proposed reclassifii:ation of subject pmperty is necessary
and/or desisable for the orderly arid proper develognent of the oaammity.
9. That the proposed reclassificati.on of subject pm~~'ty does properly
relat~ to t1~.e zones and their pexndtted uses locally established in close ~roximity
to subject propesty ar-d to the zones and their perntitted uses generally established
tfi~mtigYnut the oamnu~ity.
F~.SO~fTrIGN b10. PC7S-213
` 5. That tlie ~'oposed reclassification of subject property requirea the
dedication and improvanent of abutting streets in acoordance with the Circulation
Elsnent of the General Plan, due to the anticigated increase in traffic which will be
g~erated by the intensification of land use.
6. That m one i~icate3 their presence at said public he~ring in
opposition; and rn correspoml~nce vras received in opposition to subject petition.
IINI~A~fAL II~AGT RF.PORT FINDING:
That Fhvirormwlztal 7~act FteFx~rt No. 156, having been oonsidered this date
by the Anaheim City Planning Ca~missi.on aTxl evidence, both written ar~d oral, having
bepn presented to supplanent sai.d draft EIR No. 156, the Planning Crnmission beliwes
that saici draft EIR No. 156 does wnfoizn to the City and State Gtiidelines and the
State of California ~virorm~ental Quality Act aixi, based upor~ such information, does
herel7y reccn-nend to the City Council that they certi£y said EzR is in canpliance with
said Envirormental Quality Act.
NOW~ Tf~gF~pRE, SE IT 1~SOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Carmission
does hereby recamer~d to the City Council of the City of Anaheim that subject
Petition for Reclassification be approved and, Y~y so doing, that Title 18-Zonir-g of
the 1lnaheim Municipal Code be mnended tn cxclude tY:e abwe-described property frcm
the Rt~f-1200(SC) (RESIDII~FPIAL~ MULTIPLE-F~1NffLY - SL'N7SiC Q~RRIDOR WERT~YD 7~U1dE dnd to
inoorporate said describecl pr.operty into Yste CL (SC) (C(XVPg.'RCIAL, LIIP'D.'I~3 -~IIC
OORRIDOR C1V~Y) ZOI~ upon the following c~nditions which are herEby found t~o be a
necessazy prerequisite to the prcmosed use of subject property in orJer to preserve
the safety and general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Aneiheimo
1. That all engineering re~uiranents of the City o£ P.naheim, alorg
Is~erial Highway, Ia Palma Avenue, and Street "A", including preparation of
impravanent plans anci installation of all imprwenents such as curbs, gutters,
sidewalks, street gradiny ar~d paving, drainage facilities, or other appurtenant v,ork,
shall be ornspl.ied with as r~uired by the City Enqineer and in accoY+dance wich
stanc3axrl plans and specifications an file in the Office of the City Engineer'; that
street lighting facilities along uiq~esial Highway, I~ Palma Avenue and Street "A"
shall be installed as rg;uixed by the Director of Public Utilities anci in aooox~dance
with standa~i plans and specifications on file in the Office of the Director of
Public Utilities; a~xi that a bond in an amount and fonn satisfactory to the City of
Anaheim shaJ.l be posted ~~a.th the City to guarantee the installation o£ the abovr
mer-tioned requirenents.
2. That the ovmer(s) of subject'prc~ez'ty shall pay to the City of Anaheim
the s~an of 60 cents per front foot along Street "A" for tree planting p~~poses.
3. That trash storage azeas shall be provided in accordance with approved
plans on file wi.t-~~ t1~ Office of the Director of Puhlic Works.
4. That fise }~ydrants shall be installed and charged as required and
determined to be necessary ky the Chief of the Fire Departrnent prior to crnmPS-ee~nt
of structural fr~ning.
5. That subject property shall be sExve3 by unde.rgt.'ound utilities.
6. That drainage of subject propert.y shall Y~e disposed of in a manner
satisfactoxy to the City L•hgineer.
7. In the event that subject property i~ to divided for the purpose of
sale, lease, or financi.rx3, a parcel map, to record the appravocl division of subject
propESty shall be sutrnittExi to and appraved. by the City of Anaheim air3 then be
reoorcled in the Office of ~.he Orange County Recorcier.
8. That cattpletion of these reclassification procee~ings is contingent
upon the granting of Variance No. 2733.
9. That appropriate water assess~nt Pees, as detennineci by the Direct,or
of Public Utilities, shall be paid to the City of Anaheim prior to the issuance of a
b,; »ing peanit.
10. Frior •~o the introduction of an ordi.nance rezaning subject property.
Co~3ition Nos. 1., 2, and 7, al~we-nwlztionc33, shall be ornrpleted. 'ahe provisions cr
rights granted by this resolution shall beoane null and wid by action of the City
-2- RESOII]PICRd N0. PC7S-213
~ `Council unless said wr~7'itions are oanplied with within~one (1) year fran the date
hereof, or such further time as the City Council may grant.
11, That Conditi.on Nos. 3, 5, and 6, a}x~ve-mentioned, shall be caTg~lieci
with prior to final. tui.lding and zoning inspections.
TI~ FDRf7G0ING RFSOLUrIO:d is signed and appmvsi by me this 29th day of
Ortober, 1975.
~~
Q~1IRh41tq~ Plm TfT~PORE
ANAI~IM CPPY PIANNIIJC ODtMlSSI(7N
AZTEST:
~ ~~:~.:~ J,~ ~z~-~o~.,~
srx~.~a~c, a,tu~x~ crrY P~~arc oorQ~ssioK
STATE OF C~1T,7FOIdTIA )
CO[RJTY OF ORANGE )ss.
CITY OF ANAFIEIM )
I, Patricia 8. Scanlari, Secretary of the City Planninq Carmission of the
City o£ .~naheim, do hereby certify t1~at *_he foregoi.ng resolution was passed and
adopted at a meeting of the City Planning O~mission of the City of Anaheim, held on
October 29, 1975, at 1:30 p.m., by the follaaing vote of the menbers thereof:
AYES: CONA'lISSIO?~RS: HAFaQES~ FIGRLiST~ JOHNSC7N, KING, Zt~IAR~ NI~RI~Y
NQES: G'0~1ISSIOb1ERS: NONE
ABSII~T: COAL`~QSSIONERS: FARPNO
1975.
IN WIT.'~SS WI~KbOT', I have hereunbo set my hand this 29th day of October,
~~:~~~ ~6~~a~.~a.,~
S~F1Fnt~ ANAFIEIhl PIA*V~III1G QDNd~'IISSION
-3- RF•SOLilPI(7N N0. PC7.°r213