PC 75-23F Y ,~ ~ ~
RESOLUI'ION N0. PC75-23
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT~_BE DENIED
A'}~~REAS, the City Planning Commission of the City oE Aneheim did receive a verified Petition for Con-
ditionaSilsePermitErom WILLIAM 5. ~ CAROL P. HARVEY, 26385 Naccome Drive, Mission Viejo,
Califo~rria 92675 (Owners); LOUIS G. KELLY, Ace fireworks Company, Inc., 2025 Cedar Avenue,
#2, Long Beach, California 90806 (Agent) of certain real property situated in tha City
of Anaheim, Lounty of Orange, State ~f Calif~rnia, described as Lot No. 11 of Tract No.
5078 as per map recorded in book 188 pages 7 and 8 of Miscellaneous Maps, 'sn the office
of the county recorder of said county; and
WHEREL0.S, the City ~l.annang'Commission did hold a public hearing at the City Hall in the City of Aneheim
on Feb ruary 3, ~ 975 , ai 1:30 o'clock P.M., notice af seid public hearing heving been duly given
as cequited by law and ia accordunce with the provisions af the Anaheim Municipel code, Chapter 18,03~to heat
and cortsidec evickence f,or and against said propased conditional use and to investigete and meke finding:; and
recommendations in cor.nection tnerewith; erid
WHEkEAS, si3id Commission, after due inspection, investigation, and study made by itsel[ and in its be-
half, and efter due consideratian of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find +~nd determinc :he
following fects:
1. That the proposed use is properly one for which a Conditional Use Permit is authocized by Code
Section 18.61.050, to wit: permit the storage of fireworks in the ML (INDUSTRIAL, LIGHT)
"LONE.
2. That the proposed use is hereby denied or, the basis that approximately 6Q persons,
consisting of property owner•s, residents, and employees in the immediate area, signed
petitions (n opposition and, therefore, the proposal would be detrimental to the peace,
health, safety and general o~el(are of those citizens; although City StafF provided in-
formation indicating that the proposed use was compatible with industrial development.
3, That the proposed use will adversely arfect the adjoining land uses and the
growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be located,
4. That the size and shape of the site proposed for the use is n~t adequate to
allow the full development of the proposed use in a manner not de~rimental to the particular
area nor to tiie peace, health, safety, and general welfare of the Citizens of the City of
Anaheim.
5. That the granting of the Condition Use Pe*mit. will be detr•imental to the peace,
health, safety, and general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim.
6. That t.hree (3) persons appeared at said public hearing in opposit;un.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPAGT REPORT FINDING:
That the Planning Commission recommends to the City Cnuncil that the subject project be
exempt from the requirement to prepare an Environmental Impact Report pursuant to the
provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act.
CI-D -1-
RESOLUTION N0. PC75-23
~ '• y . ~ ~
NOW, THEI2EFORE, BE IT RESOLVED thet the Aasheim City Plenning Commission does hereby deny subject
Petition for Conditionel Use Permit on the basls of the eforementioned findings.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is sigaed c+nd approved by me this 3rd day of February, 1975.
CH IRMAN ANAH IM Y PLANNRdG COMMISSION
ATTEST:
~ ~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CA'LIFORNIA 1
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAH~'iM )
I, Patr ic i a B. Scan lai, Seccetary of the City Plenning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do h~reby cedify that the foce-
going resolution wes passed end adopted et e meeting of :1ie City Planning Commission ofthe City of pnaheim, held on
Feb rua ry 3, 1975 , et ~; 34i'clock P.M:, oy the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: GAUER, JOHNSON, KING, MORLEY
NOES: C0~1;MISSIONERS: FARANO, TOLAR, HERBST
ABSENT: COMMISSIaNERS: NONE
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I havE hereunto set my hand this 3 rd day o f Feb rua ry , 1975.
l'"//~.~i~i~~ ~ X~'~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNIIJG COMMISSION
_~
RESOLUTION N0. PC75-23