PC 75-232L=i
RESOLiTP7d!d N0. PC75-232
.~
~
A RESOLU'IOid OF TI~' CITSt PLANNING OONG'IISSION OF Tf~ CITY OF APIAF~IA'
TH7~T PL•TITIOfI FOR CCRJUITIO~^II~L USE P~RMIT N0. 1576 HE Q2AtfPED.
W[~RF1~S, the City Plannirx3 Catmission of the City of Anaheim clic3 receive a
verifieci Petition for Corrliti.o:~a1 Use Pe.nnit fmn ~BERT D. PERAY, 28022 Via Cesnuc~z,
Mission Viejo, California 92675 (Owner); RAYM~ND GfJRUi~, 905 E. Catalina, Santa An~.,
California 92706 (l~gent) of certain real propcsty situated in the City of l~naheim,
County of Orange, State of California, descriUed as:
The larr3 referreci to in this report is situat.ed in the State of California, County of
Orange, anci is described as follows:
ihe L4est 10.00 acres of the Southeast c;uarter of the Soutknaest rn,a*+pr of Section 23,
Trnanship 4 SouUi, Range 10 West in the Rancho San Juan Cajon de Santa Ana, in the
City o£ Anaheim, as per map recordeci in book 51, ~~ge 10, t7iscellanecus i~Lips, in the
office of the county recorder of saicl county.
EXCII'TIIdG an undivided 14/19ths interest in that portion thereof describe3 as
follows:
IIeginning Pdorth 481.00 feet frcm the Southwest wrner of said ~4est 10.0~ acres;
tlience East 20.00 feet; thence North 60.00 feet; thence West 20.00 feet; thence Soutli
60.00 feet to the point of beginning.
AI.SO EXC~P'P~~G TI~'%~1 that portion theroof lying Sout}naesterly of the following
describecl line:
IIeginning at a point in the Sauthesly line of said Section 23, distant along saici
Southerly line *Ior~`~ A9° 57' A5" East 61.75 feet fran the 5autha~st corner of that
certain la~i conveyed to the Stat~ of California by deeci recorclo3 in book 2277, Pa4e
503, Officia]. Rec,rords; tlience North 00° 02' 15" West 70.00 feet to a c1~~ve concave
:lortherly having a radius of. 930.OQ feet; thence along said curve t~escerly frcm a
tangent wlu.ch bears South 69° 57' 45" West, through an angle of 37° 10' 56", an arc
distance of 279.05 feet; thence North 45° 18' S0" j9est 310.80 feet; thence North 65°
39' 18" V7est 171.47 feet.
N~0 L•'XQ~'PIt1G Tf~ItII'F3"~'~ that portion therE~f lying :lortherly of the Southerly line,
anci tl~e Easterly extension therc~f, of Parcei 2, as :,hown cn a map filed in book 38,
page 5 of Parcel Maps, in the office o£ the oc~.uity reoorder of said crnulty.
WI~REAS, the City Planni:r7 Camiission did hc~la a public hearinq at the City
Hall in the City of 1lnaheim on Nweni~x 10, 1975, at 1:30 p.m., notice of said public
heariny having been duly given as rec~~ired l~y law and in accordance with the
provisions of the Anaheim Nhmicipal Caie, Chapter lII.b3, to hear ancl consider
ev`~cience for and against said proposed wnditional use and to investigate and make
firdingc anl recarr:iendations in connecti.on therewith; anci
t~,r,, 3~ , said Caimission, after due inspecti.on, investigation and study made
r~y its~''w1f arxl ~n its behalf, anci after due wnsideration o:: all evidence and reports
caffex+~ ~~ ~i~ }~y~g, does fisxi and detexmine the followirx3 facts:
,~, ^}~at the proposed use is properly one for which a wmiitional use
~'~3t is au~pj~ar~z~Y by Caie Section 153.61.OSO.Q70, to wit: pettnit an autarobile
en9~ine :ar'Y1 ':sa~;,~I}~Jio1?~ ~Pepair facility in the t~ (INWSTRIAL, LIt+1I'i~) ZONF.•
2. That the Plannirig Cartnission expressed concerns U~at the subject
1c~ztion was )bt appmpriate for a retail-type business, and the petiti.oner
=itip~;~~l~ ?~t the proposal is to rebuild autambile engines and tran4nissions at
'~he svbjc~t location ~d at least 85$ of the business will be on a wholesale basis to
~c~r~1.e1~:
3. That the petitioner stipulated thaL• all of the proposeci repair
(r.eYuilding) ~+ork would be wnducted inside the builciing.
4. That the proposecl use wlll not adversely affect the adjoi.ning larr3 uses
ar:•1 the growtli and dev~lo~nent of the area in which it is proposed to be locatPs3.
~SOLITPIQN Y~O. PC75-232
~J
~J
5. That the size anci shape of the site proposed for the use is ad~iate to
allaa tlie full developnesit of the proposed use in a manner mt detrimental bo the
particular area nor to the peace, health, safety, and gen~sal we7.fare of the Citizens
of t]~e City of Anaheim.
6. That the granting of the Conditional Use Permit unci~s the oonciitions
v~osc~l, ii miy, will not L~e detrimental to the peace, health, safety, and general
welfare of the Citizens of the City of 7,natieim.
7. That no one indicateci their presence at said public hearing in
o~osition; arY3 no correspondence was received in opposition to su'nject petition.
EdVIRlYII~'i7~1L I!~'e1Ci REPQP~^ FZ~~UU~7G: ~
Tl~at the Director of the Plaruiing Departrnent has deternLinecl that the
proposeci activity falls withi.n the definition of Secti.on 3.01, Class 1, of the City of
Anaheim Gui.clelines to tlie Requiranents for an L'nvirorm~ntal 7~act Report anci is,
therefore, categorically e~cenpt fr~m the re~uirc3nent to file an EIR.
t•IOW, TI~RF~'OftE, BE IT IaSOLUID that the Anaheim City Planning Catrnission
cloes hereby grant subject Petition for Conciitional Use Pesmi.t, upon the follawir~
co:r3iti.ons which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to t}~ proposed use
of the su-~jc~t property in order to preserve the safety and general welfare of the
Citizens of the Ci.ty of Flnaheim:
1. That subject prop~sty shall be developeci substantially in accord~:ce
with plans arxi specifications on file ~aith the City of Anaheim markecl F~shibit Nos. 1
arrl 2.
2. That a minimun of fl5$ of the proposed repair (sebuilr~ing) of autarobiic
engines anci transnissions shall 2~ on a wholesale basis to dealess, as stipulatecl tc
by the petitioner.
3. That all of the proposeci repair (rebuilding) of auts~nobile :.ngiszes aiYi
transnissions shall be conducted inside the building, as stipulated to by the petibionor.
TI~ FOFiGGOaIG RF.SOLtTrION is signeci and approved by me this lOth ciay of
IJove+il~er, 1975.
~
CHl~iRI~9~7~ dAiICIM CITY PL'~;JNI?~IG CCY.~'PIISSIfT~
Ai^I~~ SP:
~/C~i~'~ ~ ~~tJ
SI~R~iAR7Ci AbII1I~IM CITX PLAh1NING COAII+lISSId:d
sra~ or• c~,~or~rx~ )
O~U2dTY OF ORAtIGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAFIEIM )
I, Patrici.a B. Scanlan, Secretaxy of the City PlannirxJ Comiissicn of the
City of Anaheim, do hereby certify tt~at the foregoing resolution was passeci arr3
adoptecl at a meeti.ng of the City Planning Crnmission of the City of Ana}ieim, held on
iJovenber 10, 1975, at 1:30 p.m., by the follacing wte of tlie menbers thereof:
AYES: COt•T'aSSIONERS: ST~f]F.S~ HEFHSP, KII7G~ t+qrZI~:Y~ TOIAR, FAF~NO
NOES: OfYJP1ISSI0iJERS: NO!~
ABSII7r: COf+T4ISSI0'i1ERS: JOHIJSON
1975.
IN WITPff'SS ~~f3Ef~~OF, I have hereunto set my hand this lOth ciay of Novc3nber,
~~~~~~
SF.CRErARY~ ANAHEIId CITY PIA.^RJIIIG OOM•1IS: 70IJ
-2- RESOI.iTrldN N0. PC75-232