PC 75-265., ~ ~
RESOLUTIOYt N0. PC75-265
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLAIJNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
RFCOMMENDING TO TIIE CITY CdUtJCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM THAT
PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATIOq N0. 75-.76-15 BE APPROVED.
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim did receive a
verified Petition for Reclassification from JOHN P. & MAUP.cEN M. YOUNKIN,
1141 Castlegate Lane, Santa Ana, CA 927~5 (Owners); I.P.S. - Attn: Ron Comer,
P.O. Box 6348, Orange, CA 92669 (Agent) of certain real property situated i~ the
City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of Callfornia described as:
THAT PORTION OF LOTS 3 At~D 4 IN BLGCK 23 OF GOLDEPI STATE TRACT, AS SHOWN ON
A MAP THEREOF RECORDED IN ROOK 4, PAGES 66 AND 67 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS,
RECORDS OF SAID ORAtJGE COUNTY, DESf,RIUED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT TNE !NTERSECTION OF THE SOiJTIiWESTERLY L~I~E OF SAID LOT 3 WITti
A LINE THAT IS PARALLEL WITN AND DISTANT WESTERLY 217.50 FEET MEASURED AT
RIGHT ANGLES FROM THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 3; TNENCE NORTN 7° 26' 30"
WEST ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE A DISTANCE OF 361,90 FEET, SAID POINT BEING THE
TRUE POINT OF BEGI~~NItlG; THEP7CE SOUTII 82~ 33' 30" WEST 230.12 FEET; THENCE
SOUTH 29~ 19' 30" WEST 132.18 FEET TO A LINE THAT IS PARALLEL WITN A~lD DISTANT
NORTHEASTERLY 20.00 FEET MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES FROM THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE
OF SAID LOT 3; THENCE NORTN 60~ 40' 30" WEST ALONG SAID PARALLEL LI~JE A D157ANCE
OF 376.31 FEET; THENCE NORTH 7° 26' 30" IdEST 3Z5.51 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY
LINE OF LAND DESLRIBED AS PARCEL 2 IN A DEED TO THE STATE OF CALIFORPlIA FILED
FEBRUARY 25, 1954 AS DOCUMENT N0, 28719, IN THE OFFICE OF TIIE REGISTRAR OF
TITLES IN TNE OFFlCE 0(" THf COUNTY RECORDER OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALfFORNIA; TItI:NCE
NORTH 82° 33' 30" EAST 610.69 FEET ALOPIG SAID SQUTHERLY LINE AND ITS EASTERLY
PROIONGATION TO A LINE THAT IS PARALLEL WITH AtJD DISTANT WESTERLY 217.50 fEET
MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES FROM TNE EASTERLY LI~~E OF SAID LOT 3; THENCE SOUTN
7° 26' 30" EAST 444.86 FEET TO TIiE TRUE POINT OF BEGIIJ~7lNG.
EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE WESTERLY 145.00 FEET THEREOF MEASURED ALONG NURTHERLY
LINE OF SAID LOTS.
ALSO EXLEPTIIJG TNEREFROM THAT PORTION OF 5AID LAND LYING NOR7H AND EAS7ERLY
OF THE FOLLOW~NG DESCRIBED LII~E:
COMME~~CING AT A POINT ON TNE tvEST LINE OF THE EAST 217.50 FEET OF SAID LOT 3
DISTANT ALONG SAID WEST LINF., SOUTH 7° 19' 35" EAST, 368.16 FEET FROM THE
NORTH L~NE OF CANAL STREET 25.00 FEET WIDF AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP; TNENCE WESTERLY
ALONG A NON-TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE NOaTHERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF ~.948.00 FEET
FROM A TAPlGENT WHILH BEARS SOUTH 86° 07' I1" WEST, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 336.32
FEET TO THE NORTHERLY I.I~JE OF THE LAt~D DESCRIBED IN UEED TO FREEWAY INDUSTRIAL
CENTER, INC., RECORDED OCTOBER 31, 19G3 IPI BOOK 67fi6, PAGE il OF OFFIClAL RECORDS.
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City
Hall tn the City of Anaheim on Decer~ber 22, 19,75, at 1:30 p.m., not(ce of said publfc
hearing having 6een duly niven d§ ~aqui~ed ~;~~ y~;~ and in accordance with the pro-
visions of t~ie Anahetm ~un~j~j~~l Code~ Ehe~;te.* 18.03, to hear and consider evidence
for an.~ a~gdinst saidl proq~o~~r) recclass~jp~~~~p~~ and to investigaYe and make findings
~1~d fGCOrtmr~ndaSion~ J~ c:'^.nnec.ti'~oA ;the~eWilth; and
~WHEFtE1L., sai.u Co~,~~d§~stoci, d~`Fter du~~ t^5pet~tlon, investigation and study
m:~ae by itself a~~+~i In ff4 ~ehalf, aand aft~r d~e EasnsfdP.r-a[ton of all evidence and
report~ 6'ffEFld atl :}a~~ h~af7f19~ iM~je~ f111d and determine the following facts:
1. That f:?m Fe' °lonerl~mposes a retlassification of the above-described
prc?v~rty from the f;~:a-4, ~~J(0;1 (R~~I7l`~:iIAL/AGRICULTURAL - OIL PRODUCTION OVERLAY)
Z03!~ to the RM-124o{G,~ (~~:sIR•€hPfiJA~p 'MUI_TIPLE-FAMIIY - OIL PRdDUCTION OVERLAY) ZONE.
2. 7hat t,he Amatn~im General Plan designates sub~ect property for medium
density re:~tdentl~l asgs,
3. 11'nat tl~~" petitianer stipulated to payii~q a proportionate share of the
expenses previ'ously incurred by the City of Anaheim for acquisition of' right-of-way
and street improvements in connection with the impr~~vements to Jackson 5treet, said
proportionate share being 24.35~ of the t~tal costs and amounting to 53,331.08 for
right-of-way acquisition and $3.947.9? for the street improvements, or a total of
~7,279.05 as the proportionate share.
RESOLUTION N0. PC75-265
~ ~
4. That the proposed reclassification of subject property is necessary and/or
desirable for the orderly and proper development of the cortmunit,Y.
5. That the proposed reclassification of sub~ect property daes properly
relate to the zones and their permitted uses locally established in close pr4ximity
to sub~ect property and to the zones and the9r peT•mitted uses generally esta~lished
throughout the commun'+ty.
6. That the proposed reclassif9cation of subject proper~ty requires the
dedication and improvement of abutting streets in accordance with the Circulation
Element of the General Plan, due to the a~tic9pated increase in traffic wh9ch will
be generated by the intensification of land use.
7. That no one indicated their presence at said public hearing in opposition;
and no corr•espondence was rec2ived in opposition to sub~ect petition.
ENVIRONI4ENTAL IMPACT REPUP,T FI(JDIPJG:
That the Anaheim City Planning Cor~n9ssion does hereby recortanend ta the City
Council of the City of Anaheim that the sub~ect project be exempt from the require-
ment to file an Environmental Impact Report, pursuant ta the provisions of the
California Environmer.tal Quality Act.
WOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVEU that the Anaheim City Planning Comnission
does hereby grant sub~ect Petition for Reclassification be approved and, by so doing,
that Title 18-Zoning of the Anaheim Municipal Code be amended to exclude the above-
described property from the RS-A-43~000(0) (RESIDENTIAL/AGRICULTURAL - OIL PRODUCTION
OVERLAY) ZONE to the RM-1200(0) (RE':iIDENTIAL~ MULTIPLE-FA~4ILY - OIL PRODUCTION
OVERLAY) ZONE upon the following conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary
prerequisite to the proposed use of subject property in order to preserve the safety
and general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim:
.(1) That the owner(s) of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim
a strip of land 51 feet in width from the centerline of the street along Frontera Street
for street-widening purposes.
(2) That all engineering requirements of the City of Anaheim along Frontera
Street, including preparation of improvement plans anc~ installation of all improve-
ments such as curbs and gutters, sid~walks, street grading and paving~ drainage
facilities, or other appurtenant work~ shall be complied with as requlred by the City
Engineer and in accordance with standard pla~ns and speciflcations on file in the office
of ths City Engineer; that street 19ghting facilities atong Frontera street and ,lackson
Avenue shall be installed as required by the Director of Public Utilities and in
accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office bf the Director
of Public Utilities; and that a bond in an amount and form satisfactory to the r,tty of
Anaheim shall be posted with the City to guarantee the i~stallation of the above-mentioned
requ~Irements.
(3) That the owner(s) of sub~ect property shall pay to the City of Anaheim
the sum of 60¢ per front foot along Frontera Street and Jackson Avenue for tree
planting purposes.
plans on file with thesoffice of theaDirectorbofPPubl~icdWorksc~ordance with approved
(5) That fire hydrants shall be installed and charged as required and
dete~7nined to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department prior to commencement
of structural framing.
(6) That all air-conditionimg facilities shall be properly shielded from
view and the sound bufferad from ad~acent propprties.
(7) That sub~ect property sl~all be serve~i by underground utilities.
(8) That drainage of sub~ec~t property shall be disposed of in a manner
satisfactory to the City Engir~eer.
(9) In the event that sub3e~ct property is to be divided for Lhe purpose of
sale. lease or financing. a parcel map to record the approved division ~f sub~ect
property shall be submitted to and ap~proved by the City of Anaheim and then be recorded
in the office of the Orange County Re;corder.
_Z_ RESULUTION N0. PC75-265
~ ~
(10) That the owner(s) of sub~ect property shali pay to the City of Anaheim
the appropriate park and recreation in-iieu fees, as dete~ined to be appropriate by
the City Council, said fees to be paid at the time the building permit is issued.
(11) That appropriate water assessment fees, as determined by the Director of
Pu67?~ Jtilities, shall be paid to the City of Anaheim prior to the issuance of a
building permit.
(12) That the owner(s) of sub3ect property shall pay to the City of Anaheim
a proportionate share of the expenses previously i~curred by the City of Anaheim for
the acquisition of right-of-iaay and street improvements in connection with the i~nprove-
ments to Jackson Avenue, said proportionate share being 24.35" of the total costs
and amounting to $3,331.08 for right-of-way acquisitio~ and 33,947.97 for the street
improvements, or a total of $7,279.05 as the proportionate share~ as stipulated to by
the petitioner, prior to the issuance of a building permit.
(13) That the owner(s) of subfect property sl;all pay drainage reimbursement
fees of 5444.35 per acre to the City of Anaheim prior to approval of a grading plan
or, in the event no grading plan is required, prior to issuance of a building permit.
(14) Prior to the introduction of an ordinance rezoning subject property
Condition Nos. 1, 2, 3. and 9, above-mentioned. shall be completed. The provisions or
rights granted by thts resolution shall become null and void by action of the City
Council unless said conditions are complied with Within one year from the date hereof,
or such further t9me as the City Council may grant.
(15) That Condition t~os. 4, 6, 7, and 8, above-mentioned, shall be complied
with prior to final Euilding and zoning inspections.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approv~d by me this 22nd day of
December, 1975.
~ ~ ~! ~~Cl/Lat..~-c/
, NH 4N N Ir S N
ATTEST:
~~Z2Gt~t.o~liv ~i~/,ll.v~
SEC E , N HE C L NN N S ON
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF ORANGE ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM
I~ Patric~fa B. Scanlan, Secretary of the City Planning Commissiori of the
City of Anaheim, di~ hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was pass~d and
adopted at a meeting of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anahe9m, held on
Uecember 22~ 1975, at 1:30~.p.m., by the following vote af the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIOIVERS: BARNES~ HERBST~ JOHt450N. KINf, 140RLEY. TOLAR. FARAP~O
NOES: COMMISSIOIiERS: NONE
ADSENT: COMMISSIOIVERS: NONE
1975.
I~~ WITNESS WI~EREOf~ I have hereunto set my hand this 22nd day of December,
~~~~,~~~~~~
,
_3_ RESOLUTIOh N0. PC75-265