PC 75-28~~~ ' ~
^ ~ _ . . ~ : .. .. . ... . .
RESOLUTION N0. PC75-Z~
A RESOLUTION ~F THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEItv1
THAT; FTITION FOR VARIANCE N0. 2668 BE DENIED
: WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Malieim did receive a venfied Petition for Variance from
THE QUALITY INN HOTEL AND GREENHORNS MEAT MARKET, 616 Convention Way, Anaheim, California
92802 (Owner); TERRY L. GEER, 616 Convention Way, Nnaheim, California 928Q2 (Agent) of
certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of
California, as described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and referred to herein as
though set forth in full; and
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City Hall in the City of Anaheim on
Feb rua ry 3, 1975 , at 1:30 o'clock p.m., notice of said public hearing liaving been duly ~iven as required by law and
in accordance with the provisions of the Maheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.03, to hear and consider evidence for ar.d against said
proposed variance and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, aftcr due inspection, investigation, and study made by itseif and in its behalf, and after duc
consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find and determinc the following facts:
1. Thatthepetitionerrcqucsts the fol lowing waivers from the Anaheim Municipal Code, to allow
the use of a restored Cadillac automobile for signing purposes:
a. SECTION 18,05.093.021 - Maximum number of signs. (1 p~rmitted; ~ proposed)
b. SECTION 18.05.oy3.0211 - Minimum distance between siqns. ( 00 feet required;
36 feet and 116 feet proposed)
2. That the above-mentioned waivers are hereby denied on the basis that an in-
operative automobile used for signing purposes is not in keeping with the Sign Ordinance
and would set an undesirable precedent, particularly fcr the Commercial Recreation area.
3, That there are no exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions
applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not
apply generally to the property or class of use in the same vicinity and zone,
4. That the requested variance is not necessary for the preservation and enjoyment
of a substantial property right possessed by other properCy in the same vicinity and zone,
and denied to the property in question.
5, That the requested variance will be materially detrimental to the public welfare
or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the
property is located.
6. That no one indicated their presence at said public hearing in opposition and no
correspondence was received in opposition to subject petition.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPGRT FINDING:
That the Director of Development 5ervices has determined that the proposed activity falls
within t~ie definition of Section 3.Olp.Class 3 of the City of Anaheim Guidelines to the
Requirements for an Environmental Impact Report and is, therefore, categorically exempt
from the requirement to file an EIR. .
V1-D -I - RESOLUTION N0. PC75-28
DEV-66•E ,
;.,~i'- ~-~,~~y~~~l ~~~~r.
oFSC~:; FT tar~ L
, ___._. . . -~ .._-----~, - - - - =y~______.,
T~-Ic A:Oi~; H HALF GF Ti;~ ~OUTHcAST GUARTEI2 OF THE NORTH'r1EST OUAR ~ Ef~ ~
Q"rYS~C?10~I 77+ 10~f:~5!IIP 4 SOU1'Hs RAF:Gc 10 '~lEST~ PA;2TLY ?N 7Hc ~
RAPJCI;O Si~f: Ji:i,i~ C:,.:L••'~ ~= ~%-.~~ i k AP;~ A?.v PAR i LY I~~ THE Rfv~Crl~
LAS L~~SG.~~ IPI 1Hc C?TY CF AcdAFiEI:4s CGU~JTY Or oRi~NGE~ S;;,TE .
CF C:~L i FO~~..': I n r AS PE? i•i:~P RECORDED i N P,OC%C 5' Pi,GE 10 OF h1I5CEL! AN~OJ~i
MAPSs I"! iF!~ OFF;:E 0= TH~ COt1Pl7Y ;~C~RGEr'. 0= SAID COU~:''Y.
EX:EF7 iHE SOU7H 27i,0U FE~i OF TH~ En~T 395.00 FEET THEREOF.
AL50 E'/.CEF7 Ai~ UiIDIV;D~~ ~:t-TH;F2D INT:REST IN AP~D TO "iHE FOL.! Q~n~ING~
B~Gi?:'•:It•;3 i+T A P0:`:T @3 -~~i SOUTH ;;:`:D 133 r"EET 41E5? OF TME
I~ORTI~EAST CORfIER CP ~AiD`i;ORTH HA? F~ ?HEi•iC= SOUTH 16 FEETi •
THE~dCE 7~cST 14 ~; ~~ i T, H~i~C< <iORTFI :6 FcET t ANC THENCE EP.ST
14 FE£I TO THc POI?:~i OF 6~G:J:~;IitiGe ~
ALSO FXC; PT THitiT FOi2i IC;•: iH~REOF GESCn:F3E0 AS FOLL04l5e
COP~ih1~NCING AT TFIE C~~;7ERL.T~~IE IhTERSECi ION Or KATELLA AVENUE
AND HARFiO.°. BCI:LGVARDi AS•SHO'r!N OPJ A~UaP rILED IM BOOK 76r ?kGE
3 OF R_CORD Or SURVEYS~ 1P! THE OFFICE OF THE COUP~TY RECORDER
OF SAID COUNi:t'; iHE.i;:E SOUTH 1° 20' 5~" EA~T ALO~G TNE CENTERI.iP:E
OF HAFleOR BOULEVARD A DI~T:,i~:CE'0~ 1~1G.01 FtET TO A PO?Fd7 OF
It~TERSEC?IOid 'v;iTH T~'IC RORTH LIPdE O~ SniD NORTH HALF CF SA:D •
SO!1TFiE:~S? GU1°TER OF S.^.ID i:ORTH'tJ~ST GU~nTERt. SAID ?OINT A150
BE:NG THC T~UE FC:i4T OF ::EGI~i~IP;Gi THEi<CE COPr'Ili~U:NG FiLOtiG
THE CE~dTERLINE OF•HARBOR ~3~ULEVA?D~ SCUTY i° 20~ ~5" EAST A
DISTArlCE OF 3&r,~C3 FEETs THENCE SOI;TH 89° 46~ 15~~ t~JE57 A~I57A~~:E
OF fi0~~1 fEE~s THEMCc NORiH 1° 20~ 5:'~ ;JEST ~ DISTANCE OF 30G+57
FEET TO ThIE ESEGINNI~JG OF A TANGEfdT CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHL~iESTERLY
kN0 Flr^.Vliv:: A RADIUj 0~ 25 FE~T1 TFIcNCE i~OilTHEF~'LY A1D :JES~ERLY •
/1LONG SAID CURVE TH''.OUGhi A C,ENiRAL i+;VGI.E OF flo° 70' 7" A~ A?C
DIST~PiCc Or 3ESs7S rEE7: TNEhCE SOU7H 89° 48` >B° l'JESi A DiSTAlV~E
Or 1"L~.3T79 FEE1 i TH~~Cc ~dORiH 1° 5~ GO" ~~lEST A DISTAr:C~ Or"
55001 FcE~ t TNEhICE i`GR~H 89° 4£i° 5$° EAST A' DISTANCE OF' 1327~5~
~ FEET TO THc TRUE POI(~i G~ BEGINivIP~G~ ' • 1
~;_- - ~.a,~. ~=..---=-s......_ -- ____.__.__ --~
'~'';,•~'; ~'~'~ ' ;,,~
. •rC?~ '<ii
....
.- ~,'.;"
_ ........"-'--'.-~-'-"-••--_'....-'--.'--'-.._~~...`_.~__ ,
.. . ...._...._. ..... ._.... . . . . -V"~ .i~,/ .
'~; ~'~!/
, r1~,,~n
• ( ~ / /
~l~~.l~l~i~l'i1~4. 1~iL. ~~^~
v .
. . ~. _
-~----~-..,._:,.__.. _,.._._._..__. _. __
,.,.,~.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission d~e:7~ereby deny subjcct Petitian for
Variancc on the basis of the aforcmentioned finds.
THE FOREGOING RESOLLiTION is signed and approved by me this 3 rd day of Feb ~~~a ;•y , 1975.
~ ~
IRMAN ANA EI CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
~~;~~.~~3 ~.~,~~.yJ
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CiTY PLANNiNG COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Pa t r i e i a B. Sean 1 an , Secretary oP the City Planning Commission of the City of Analieim, do hereby certify that the
f~regoing resolution was passed and adopted at a mecting of the City Planning Commission of thc City of Anaheim, huld on
Feb rua ry 3~ ~ 975 , at 1:30 o'clock p.m., by Uic following vote of the members Lhereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: FARANO, GAUER, JOHNSON, KING, MORLEY, TOLAR, HERBST
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 3 rd day of Feb rua ry , 1975.
,~~.~~/~ ~' ~~-~ -~ _~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
V2-D
-2-
RESOLUTION N0. PC75-28