PC 75-32~r •' ~" RESOL~N N0. PC75-32
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNZNG C0111MISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF 741E75IT220~' ANAHEYM THAT
PET?TION FOR REC?.ASSIFICATION N0. , BE APPROVEO
WHEFEAS, the Ciry Plenning Commission of the City of Anaheim dId ceceiver e vedfled Petition for Reelessifice- '
tionfrom ROBERT M. CROSS, 469-A Weat Valencia Drive, Fullertan; Ca. 92632 (Owner); ROY DE CELL
Anaheim L3ncoln Center, 4941 Orange Avenue, Cypress, Ca. 90630 (Agent) of certain real property
situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of Celifornia, described as THAT POR-
TION OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE hORTHWEST QUARTER OF SBCTION ZS, TOWNSHIP 4 SOUTH, RANGE 10 WEST,
IN THE RANCHO LOS ~OYOTES AS PER MAP RcCORDED IIv B~OK 51 PAGE.10 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, IN THE
OFFICE OF COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNIIdG AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 23, TRACT N0. 6691 RECORDED IN BOOK 250 PAGES 20 AND
21 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, RECORDS OF SAID ORANGE COWTY,.BEING ALSO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF
PARCEL 1 AS DESCRISED IN A DEED TO TF~ CITY OF ANAHEIM RECORDED JANUARY 30, 1969 IN BOOK 8860
PAGE 228 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS; THENCE ALONG THE BOUNCARY Or SAID LP.ND OF THE CITY OF AIvAHEIM THE
FOLLOWING ~OURSES: NORTH O1° O1' 11" WEST 184.97 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE
SOUTHEASTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 25.00 FEET NORTHERLY AND NORTIIEA5TERLY 39.26 FEET THROUGH A
CENTRAL ANGLE OF 89° 59' 11" TO A LINE THAT IS PARALLEL WITH AND SOUTHERLY 66.00 FEET FROM THE
NORTH LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE NORTH 88° 58~ 00" EAST
333.21 FEET TO AN ItITERSECTION WITH THE rORTHERLY PROLONGATION OF THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY OF
SAID TRACT N0, 6691; T.HENCE SOUTH 00° 11' 18" EAST 210.00 FEET ALONG SAID NORT:lERLY PROLONGA-
TION TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TRACT N0. 6691; THENCE SOUTH 88° 58' 00" WEST 358.19 FEET
ALONG THE NORTHERLY BOWDARY OF SAID TRACT N0. 6691 TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
; and
WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commis3ion did hold a public hearing et the City Hell in the City of Aneheim on
February 19, 1975 ot 1:30o'clock P.M. notice oE seid public hearing having been duly given as required by
lew and in eccordence with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipa] Code, Chaptec 18A3; to hear end consider evldence
for end egeinst seid proposed reclassiEicetion and to investigete and meke findings end recommendations in connection
therewith; end
WHEREAS, seid Commission, efter due inspection, investigetion, end study made by itselE end,in its behalf, and
efter due considecation of ell evidence end reports offeced et seid hearing, does find snd determine the Eollowinq fects:
1. Thet the petitioner proposes a reclessification oE the above described property from the CL (COMMERCIAL,
LIDIITED and CO (COMMERCIAL OFFIC~) ZONES to the CL (COMMERCIAL, LIMITED) 20NE.
2. Thet the Anaheim General Plan designates sub~ect property for general comcrercial
uses.
3. .Thet the proposed reclassificetion of subject property is necessary end/or desireble (or the acderly and pro-
per development of the community.
4. That the proposed reclessification of subJect propecty does properly relete to the zones end their permitted
uses locelly esteblished in close proximity to subject prpperty and to the zones and thelr pecmitted uses generally esteb-
llshed throughout the community.
5. That although the Planning Commission and City Council policy is to require a 20-
foot wide landecaped buffer strip for commercial developments abutting resider~tiel zones, a 10-
foat wide landecaped buffer atrip, ae proposed, io hereby granted due to the hardahip created
by the size and ehape of the eub~ect property,.atdaimed~lt~erieswoul:dbe limited to smaller and
leas noisy trucks than.diesel-type trucke.
6. That no one indicated their presence at eaid public hesring in oppoaition and no
correapondence wae received in opposition to subject petition.
ENVIRONMENT~!l IMPACT REPORT _F_INDING: ~ •
That the Planning Commiseion recommende to the City Council that the euli~ecC pro~ect
be exempt from the requirement to prepare an Environmental ImFact Report p~rauant to the pro-
viei~n~ of the California EnvironmentaZ Quality_~,ct. ggSOLUTION N0. PC75-32
., NOW, TY,EKEFORE, BE~RESOLVED that the Anahelm City PI g Commieaion.doce heceby vecommmd
~~to the City Cour.cil of the .City~E An.ehelm that eubject Petltion foc Re iflcation be epproved pn p bY from the
thet Title 18-Zoning oi the Anaheim Muniefpal ~ode be emended to exclude ~~e ebove described co edY
CL (COMMERCIAL, LIMITED) and CO (COMMERCIAL OFFICE) ZONES and to incorporate said described
property into the CL (COMMERC.IAL, LIMITED) ZONE upon the fellowing conditions which are hereby
found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use o£ subject property in order to pre-
serve the safety and genera'! welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim:
(1) That sidewalks shall be instt~lled along Lincoln Avenue and Gain Street as required
by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plana and opecifications on file in the
Office of the City Engineer.
(2) That trash storage areas ahall be provided in accordance with approved plans on
f.ile.with the Office of the Director of Public Works.
(3) That fire hydrants sha11 oe installed and charged as required and determined to be
necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department prior to commencement of structural iraming.
(4) That subject property shall be served by underground utilities.
(5) That drainage of subject property shall be disposed of in a manner satisf~ctory
to the City Engineer.
(6) That a 6-foot masonry wall shall be constructed along the east property line.
(7) That any parking area lighting proposed shali be down-lighted to a maximum height
oE 6 feet, which li.ghting shail be directed away from the property linea to protect the resi-
dential integrity of the area.
(8) That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans
and specifications on file with the City of Ah•sheim marked Exhibit Nos. 1(Revision No. 1),
2, and 3, pLOVided that the minimum number of perking spaces for the propoaed gross floor area
shail be provided in accordance with code requirements for general reteil stores and service
business. '
(9) That Condition Nos. 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8, above-mentioned,.shall be complied
wirh prior to final buildi.ng and zoning inspections,
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTIdN is signed end eppcoved by me this 19th day of Pebruary, 1975.
~ HAIRMAN ANh EIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
AT.TEST:
KJ~~ ~IEttX~lilil.J
SECRETARY ANAHEIM C1TY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Patricia B. Sc~inlan, Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that
the foregoing resolution was passed and edopted at a meeting of the City Planning Cammission of the City of Anehelm,
held on February 19~ 1975 at T:30Q'clock P.M., by ffie following vote of the members theceof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: FARANO, GAUER, JOHNSON, KING, MORLEY, TOLAR, HERBST
, NOESt COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto aet my hend this 19th day of February~ 1975.
~~~~~ ~~~ .
SECI2ETARY AN~IHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTIQN N0. PC75-32
R2-A ~Z