PC 75-34,t' j .
RE50LU"~NN NO. PC75-34 ~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
RECOMMENDING TO THE C1TY COUNCIL OF74 ~5 I23 OF ANAHEIM THAT
PETITIaN FOR RECLASSIFICATION N0. _--. BE APPROVED
WHEREAS, the City Plonning Commission of the City of Anaheim did receive e verified Petition Eor Reclessifice-
tionfrom GEORGE J. HEL'PZER COMPANY, 740 North La Brea Avenue, Los Angeles, Ca. 90038 (Owner)
and ANACAL EN~INEERING COMPANY, P. 0. Box 3668, Anaheim, Ca. 92803 (Agent) of certain real
property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described
as SEING A PORTION OF THE SOUTH NALF OF THE SOUTHEP,ST QUARTER OF SEi:TION 2, TQWNSHIP 4 SOUTH,
RAI~GE 10 WEST, IN THE RANCHO SAN JUAN CAJON DE SANTA ANA, AS SHOWN ON A MAP RECORDED IN BOOK
51, PAGE 10 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS,IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORUER OF SAID CO'JNTY, AND
MORE PARTICULAP.LY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOidS:
BEGINNING AT A POINT ON TflE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 2(ALSO CENTERLINE OF LA PALMA AVENUE)
DISTANT THEREOF WEST 483,01 FfiLT FROM THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 2; THENCE CONTIN-
UING SdEST 1434.54 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00° 50' 04" WEST 165.02 FEET; THENCE WEST 70.01 FEET;
THENCE N~RTH 00° 50~ 04" WEST 495.13 FEET; TI~NCE EAST 662.51 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00° 50~ 15"
WEST 559.64 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE (ALSO THE CENTERLINE OF ROMNEYA DRIVE) OF SAID SOUTH HALF
OF TIiE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 2; THENC~ EAST 661.83 rEET; THENCE SOUTH 00° 52' 06"
EAST 329.95 FEET; THENCE EAST 179.00 FEET; THENCE PARALLEL TO THB EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 2
SOUTH 0° 53' S7" EAST 989.86 rEET TO THG POINT OF BE~INNING.
; and
WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City Hall in the City oE Anaheim on
Tebruery 19, 1975 at 1:30o'clock P.M. notice of said public hearing having been duly given es required by
1ew and in accordence with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Coda, Chaptet 18,03 to hear and consider evidence
for end ageir.st seid proposed reclassification and to investigate and make findings and recommendetions in connection
therewith; end
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation, and siudy mede by itself end in its behalf, and
efter due consideration of ell e~.•idence end reports offered at seid hearing, does find end determine the following facts;
1. Thet the petitioner proposes e reclessificatio~ of the above described property from the RS-A-43~000
(RESIDENTIAL/AGRICULTURAL) ZONE Co the RM-4000 (RESIDENTIAL, MULTIPLE-FAMILY) ~ONE.
2. That although the Anaheim General Plan designates the subject property for a h3gh
school site and/or low density residential uses, the propoaed zoning is deemed to be appro-
priate at the subject location, and appropriate action ~~as been taken to =eflect the change
in land use policy by amending L•he Anaheim General Plan.
3. That the petitioner stipulated to conatructing drainage facilities in La Faima Ave-
nue between State Coilege Boulevard and Acacia Street, in e;.cordance with the City of Anaheim's
Master Plan for Drainage and as approvzd by the City Engineer.
4. That it was determined that a traffic signal as approved by the City Erigineer,
shall be installed at the intersectinn of La Palmg Avertue ar.d Haxter Street by the developer.
or subject property, .
5. That it was determined that a aix-foot mesonry wall along the property Iines
adjacent to Edison Perk sha.ll be aonstructed by the petitioner if determir.ed to be
necessa='q b'y the Director of the Parks aid Recreation Department.
6. That the Planning Coffinisaion recoIICeenda that prior to final consideration
of the proposal by the City Council, that the City Council coneider whethe.r it is
deairable for the petitioner to dedicate acreagc for park purposea rather than payi•ng
park in-lieu fees and the Parka and Recreetion Departmeat is hereby requested to pre-
pare a report thereon for City Council consideration.
7. That the proposed reclassification c+f eubject property ie necessary andJor
desirable for the orderly and proper development of the cocmnunity.
8. That the proposed reclasaification of sub~ect property does properly relate to the
zones and their permitted uses locally estabiished in close proxim:~.t}• to subject property and
to the ±ones and their permitted uaea generally estsbliehe.-3 throughout the community.
RESOLUTION N0. PC75-34
R-A "1"
DEV-G6•A
1 .9. That the propose~eclassification of subject pro~ty requirea the dedication.
and improvement of abutting streets in accordance with the Circulation Element of the
General Plan, due to the anticipated increase in traffic which will be generated by the
intensification of land use.
10. That approximately four (4j persona indicated their presence at said public
hearing in opposition; three (3) of whom appeared, and no correspondence was received
in opposition to aubject petition.
EN~IIRONMENTAL IIMPACT REPORT FZNUING:
That Environmental Impact Report No. 141 and a Supplement thereto, having been
considered this date by the City Planning Commisaion and evidence, both written and oral,
having been presented to supplement said draft of EIR No. 141, the City Planning
Commission believes that said draft of EIR No. 141 does conform to the City and State
Guidelines and the State of California Environmental Quality Act and, based upon such
informati.on, does hereby recoicmiend to the City Council that they certify said EIR is in
compliance with said Environmental Quality Act.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning doea hereby recommend
to the City Council of the City of Anaheim that eubject Petition for Reclasaification be
approved and, by so doing, that Title 18-Zoning of the Anaheim Municipal Cade be amended
to exclude the above described property f•rom the RS-A-43,000 (RESIDENTIAL/AGRICULTURAL)
ZONE and to incorporate said described property into the RM-4000 (RESIDENTIAL, MULTIPLE-
FAMILY) ZONN, upon Che following conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary
prerequisite to the proposed use of aubject property in order to preaerve the safety
and general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anahrim:
(1) That the owner(s) of subject property shall deed to the City oE Anaheim a
strip of land S3 fcet in width from the centerline of the street along La Palma Avenue;
a strip of land 32 feet in width from the centerline of the atreet along Romneya Drive;
a strip of land 32 feet in width from the centerline of the street along Baxter Street
from Romneya Drive to the south property line of Edison Park, and a atrip of land 64 feet
in width from the seuth property line of Edison Park to La Palma Avenue.
~'L). That all engineering requirements of the City of Anaheim along La Palma Avenue,
Romneya Drive and Baxter Street, including preparation of improvement plans and installation
of ali improvements such as curbs and gutters, sidewalks, street grading and paving,
drainage facilittas, or other appurtenant work aha17. be complied with as required by the
City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the
Cffice of the City Engineer; that street lighting facilities along L8 Palma Avenue,
Romneya Drive and Baxter Street shall be inetalled as required by the Director of Public
Utilities and in accordance with standard plana and specificationa on file in the office
~f the Director of Public Utilities; and that a bond in an amount and form satisfactory
to the City of Anaheim ehall be posted with the City to guarantee the installation of the
above-mentioned requirements.
(3) That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the
sum of 604 per front foot along le Palma Avenue, Romneya Drive and Baxter Street for
tree plan~ing purpoaes.
(4) That traah storage areas ahall be provided in accordance with epproved plans
on file with 1:he office of the Director of Public Works.
(5) That fire hydrapts shall be installed and charged as required and determined
to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department prior to commencement of etructural
framing.
(6) That all air-conditioning faciliL•ies ehall be properly ehielded from view
and the sound buEfered from adjacent properties.
(7) That subject property shall be aerved by underground utilities.
(8) That the petitioner ehall conetruct draiaage facilities in La Palme Avenue
between State Coilege Baulevard and Acacia Street in accordance with the City of Anaheim's
Ma[tter Plan for Dre;Cnege an~ es approved by the City Engineer.
(9) That the owner(s) of euoject property ahebl psy to the ~i*.y of Anaheim the
appropriate perk aud recreation in-lieu fees as determined to be eppropriate by the
City Council, said fees to be paid at the time the building permit is ieaued; however,
if the City Council determinea that dedication of acreage for park purposes is more
desirable than peyment of the in-Iieu fees, an appropriate condition to reflect said
determination shall be applicable.
_2_ RESOLUTION N0. PC75-34
. ~ ~
(10) That a tentative and final tract map of subject property shall be aubmitted
to and approved by the Planning Co~iasion and City Council and then be recorded in
the office of the Orange County Recorder.
(11) That the property owner(sj shall install traific signals at the interaection
of La Palma Avenue and Baxter Streetj as approved by the City Engineer.
(12) That a six-foot masonry wall shall be constructed along the west property
line of the southwesterly portion of the property and.along the east property line,
and also along the north and west property lines ad~acent to Edieon Park if determined
to be. neceasary by Che Director of the Parks and Recreation Department.
(13) That final specific plans to include a precise site plan, floor plans, and
elevationa shall be submitted to the Planning Commiseion and City Council for approval.
(14) Prior to the introduction of an ordinance rezoning aubject property,
Condition Noo. 1, 2, 3, 10, and 13, above-men~ioned, shall be completed. The proviaions
or rights granted by this resolution ahall become null and void by action of t~~e ~ity
Council unless aaid conditions are complied with within one year from the date hereof,
or aur.h further time as the City Council may grant.
(15) That Condition Nos. 4y 6, 7, 8, 11, and 12, above-ment3oned, shall be
complied with prior to fina~ building and zoning inapections.
THE FOR~GOING RESdLUT7A N is signed and approved by me this 19th day of February,1975.
~
C N A ITY P ING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
~~~~.~,~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COI4tISSION
STATE OF CALIPORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) sa.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Patricia li. Scanlan, Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim,
do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adapted at a meeting of
the City Pianning Commission of the City of Anaheim, held on the 19th day of February,
1975 at 1:30 o'clock P.M., by the foliowing vote oE the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: rARANO, GAUER, JOHNSON, KING, MORLEY, TOLAR, HERBST
NO~S: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
IN WITNESS 4i:~REOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 19th day of Februarx 1975.
~ • • /(~.. /~.t~ JA~ee /
SECRETARY ANAHEIM C;.TY PLANNING CON~SISSION
-3-
RESOLUTION N0. PC75-34