PC 75-41~ RESOLUTION NO PC -41 ~
A RESOLU710N QF THE CITY P~ANNING LOMMi5510N OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
RECOMMENDING TO T~E CITY COUNCIL OF THE ~ITY OF ANAHEIM THAT PETITION
FOR R~CLASSIF;GATIQN Na. 74-75-24'S~ APPROVED.
WHE~EAS, the C9ty P13n:~in9 Commission of 'he ~ity o~ Anaheim did receive a
verified P,etition for Reciassification from GEORGE J. HE!TZF.R COMPANY, 740 North
La Brea Avenue, Los Ange~es, Califo m ia 900j8 and T~XACO, IN~ „ 3922 Campus Drive,
Newport Beach, Galifornia 92660 (Owners); ANA~AL ENGI~EERING COMPANY, P. 0. Bo~
3668, Anaheim, Caiifornia 928~3 spgent) oS certain reai property situated in the
Lity of Aitiaheim, County of Orange, State of La1l~ornia, described as:
Being a portior. of the southe~st ~u~r2er of the "southr.ast quarter of Section 2,
Township 4 South, Range 10 West, in the Rancho San Juan Cajon de Santa Ana,
as shown on ,s rcao rec~rded in Book 51, Page 10 of Misceilaneous Maps, in the office
of the Cauraty Recorde~ of said county, and more particularly described as follows: ,
Beginning at a point on tV~: south line of said Section 2(also centerline of La
Palma Avenue) ~istant i~':~rnaf Wesfi 218.58 feet fcom thE southeast corner of said
Section 2; thence cont(i?~.'rr~g West Z6~.3~ fei~t; thence p~:allel to the east lii~e
of said Sec'eion 2~ort!' ~~ 53' S7" West 98a.86 fuet; 'ther,ce East 373•Ol feet;
thence So~:th 00~ 53' S7'~ Ea~C 3.~fx feel; thervice ~Mst i10.Q11 feet to a point on
the east line (a~so ;c~ent,erl~r~e of °`~aLe Cql?er,e ~'~vC;) of said Sectiof~ 2: thence
Soutl~ U(S° 53' '37" ~ast ;fi2.98 r"e~t; thenca We;st 21 d.6li Feet; thence So~: ch OC° 53' S7"
East 203.02 Tee° r':~ the }~bnt of beginning~ a~u
WHEREAS, the rity P';=_.^.air,; iommission did h~`!d a puuti~c hearing at the City
Nall in the Cit~~ cf :~neheim on February j?C,a~ F_,:,-~ary 19, 9975, at 1;30 p.m.,
~otice of said ~~,tubll : hearing having been di,1y gi~tr.~~~ as reauired by law and in
accordance with the , rovisions of the An.~~~',e~Uc: Municipal Code, Chapter 18.03, to
hear and consider evidence for and ,ayzim t~a d proposed reclassification and to
investigate and make findings •~nd recommendations in connection therewith; said
public hearing having been cor~C'vn~c:d to thP Planning Lommission meeting of March
3, 1975; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, afrer dce fnspection, investigacion, and study made
by itself and in its behalf, an~ atter due nonsideration of all evidance and reports
offered at said hearing, does fi~ci ?nd determine the follc•~uing facts:
l. That the petitiorser proposes a reclassification of the above-described
property from the RS-A-43,000 (RESIacNTIAL/AGRICULTURAL) ZONE to the CL (COMMERCIAL,
LIMITED) ZONE.
2. That, although the Anaheim General Plan desi9nates the subject property
for a high school site and/or low denslty residential uses, the proposed zoning is
deemed to be appropriate at the subject location, and appropriate action has been
taken to reflect the change in land use p~licy by amending the Anaheim General
Plan.
3, That the proposed reclassification of subJect property is necessary
and/or desirable Tor the orderly and proper development of this community.
4. That the proposed reclassification of subject property d~es properly
relate to the zones and their permitted uses locally established in close prox-
imity to subject property and to the zones and their permitted uses generally
established throughout the cortimunity.
5. That the proposed rec~assification of subject property requires the ded-
ication and im~srovement of abutting streets in accordance with the Circulation
Element of the General Plan, due to the anticipated increase in traffic which will
be generated by the intens:`.!cation of land use.
6. That the developer stipu4ate~ that the subject property would be developed
precisely irt accordance with the suhmiCted plans and elevations, with special
emphasis on building elevations.
7, That approximately three (3) Persons were present at said public hearing
in opposition, and two (2) letters were received in connection with subject petition.
RESOLUTION N0. PC75-41
ENVIRONMENTA~ IMPACT RE~T FINUING: ~
Thac Environmer,.al impact Repor[ No. 142 ha~inq been cons~dered on Fehruary
I9, 1975, by the City Planning Comnission and evid'ence, bath written and oral,
pr~sentcd to suppiem~nt said ~raft E~R Nt. '42, ~fae City Plarning Commission
believes that said draft Ela ~:fl. 14't.does confarm t~ Lhe CBiy and Stats: Guide-
lines and the SLate of Cai'afo~niM !:nvironmental Qua11Fy Act and, based upon such
information, does hereby re~rommend Lo the City !i,OUnt+1 'Cht~i they certify said EIR
No. 142 is in compliance with sai~ Envlronmental pual~t;~ Act.
NOW, THEREfORE, BE IT RE50LV`~ tha~ Lhe Anaheb•:r';ity ~lanni~g Gommission does
hereby recommend to the City Covnc~l of s;he Ci~~'~~f A~aheem that suh;cCt Petition
for Reclassification be approved and, by so dofr~g, that Tf:!e. 18-Zoniazg of the
Anaheim Municipal Code be amended to exclude the above~J~~[ribed F~ope,-t' f rom the
RS-A-43,000 (RESIDENTIAL/AGRICULTURAL) ZONE a~d to inct9r~~r:3:r :aid de5cribed
property into the CL (COMIIERCIAL, LIMITED) ZONE upon tfae followiny st;adiY.ions which
are hereby found to be a necessary prer~quisite to the p~oposed use ~f subject
property ir order to prese rve the safety and general welfare ot' t~e G4Fizens of the
City of Anaheim:
l, That the owner(s) of subject property sh~fl dee~ to the City of Anafieim
a strip ~f land 53 feet in width from the center~ine ~f t(ra 5~reet alo~g La Palma
Avenue for street widening purposes.
2, That all engineering requirements of th~ City of Anyheirn along La Palma
Avenue and State College Boulevard including preparation cf I+nprovement plans and
installation of all improvements such as curbs and gutters, :•~°~ewal~s, street
grading and paving, drainage facilities, or other appurtenant work shall be
mmplied with as req~ired by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans
and specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer; that street lighting
facilities along La Paima Avenue and Sta*.e College Boulevard shall be installed
as required by the Director of Public Utilities and in accordance a~ith standard
plans and specifications on file in the office of the Director of Public
lltilities; and that a bond in an amount and form satisfactory to the City of
A~aheim shall be posted with the City to 9uarantee the installation of the above-
mentioned requirements.
3, ';hat the owner(s) of subJect property shall pay to the City of Anaheim
the sum of 60C per front foot along La Palma Avenue and State Lollege Boulevard
for tree planting purposes.
4, That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved
pla~s on file with the office of the Director of Public Works.
5, That fire hydrarts shall be installed and charged as reguired and deter-
mined to be necessary by ~e Chief of the Fire Department prlor *.o commencement of
structural framing.
6. That sub;ect property shall be ~erved by underground utiliCies.
7, That drainage of subject property shall be disposed af in a manner
satisfactory to the City Engineer.
8, That a 6-foot high masonry wall shall be ~onstructed along the rtorth and
west property IinES.
9, That subject property shall be developed precfsely in accordance wit~
plans a~d specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit Dlos. 1,
2 and 5(Revision Nos. 1), and 3 and 4, as stipulated to by the pr,titioner.
10. Pri,~~r to the introduction c.f en ordinance rezoning subjece property,
Condition Nos. 1, 2 and 3, above-me~S:o:~ed, shall be completed. The provisions
or rights granted by this resolution s{ne.ll Uecom2 null and void by actton of the
City Counr.il unless said conditions are complied with within one year from the
date hereof, or such furt'.ier time as the; Lity Gou~:sil may grant.
11. That Condition Nos. 4, 6, i, ~ and 9, above-menttoned, shall be complied
with prior to final building and zonirg inspecCions.
-2_ RESOLUTION N0. PC75-41
,.
, THE fOREG0ING RESO~ION i, signed and approved by this 3rd day of March,
1975.
IRMAN, ANAHEI I Y PLANNING COI1MISSION
ATTEST:
O /u.%•
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PIANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CAL~FORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY Of ANAHEIM )
I, Patricia B. Scanlan, Secretary of the City Planning Commissio~ of the City
of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted
at a meeting of the City Plan~ing Commission of the City of Anaheim, held on 1larch
3, 1975, at 1:30 p.m., by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: FARANO, GAUER, JOHNSON, KING, H~RBST
NOES: COMMISSIONERS; NONE
AaSENT: r,OMMISSIONERS: MORLEV, TOLAR
IN WITNE55 WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 3rd day of March, 1975.
~ ~ s-~-~ ~ ~~ ~ D~,,,~
SECRETAftY, ANAH=IM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
_3_ RESOLUTION NQ. PC75-41