PC 75-44~ RESOLUTION N0. PC75-44 ~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
P.ECOMMENDING TO THE CIT'9 COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM THAT PETITION
FOR RECLASSIFICATION N0, 74_75-27 BE APPROVED.
WHEREAS, the C~ty Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim did receive a
verified Petition for Reclassification frorn JOHN A. AND GRACE C. STEFFY, 9535 Anaheim
Boulevard, Anaheim, California 92805 (~Wner); SANTA ANITA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION,
Attn: Robert W. Johnson, P. 0. Box 1880, Newport Btach, California 92660 (Agent)
of certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State
ot California, described as:
Lot Nos, l, 2 and 3 of South Street Tract as per map recorded in book 8 page 89
of Miscellaneous Maps, in the office of the county recorder of said county; and
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City
Hall in the City of Anaheim on March 3, 1975, at 1:30 p.m., notice of said public
hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions
of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.03, to hear and consider evidence for and
against said proposed reclassification and to invesYiyate and make findings and
recommendations in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation, and study made
by itself and in its 5ehalf, and after due consideration of all evide ~ce and reports
offered at said hearing, does find an~ determine the following facts:
1. That the petitioner proposes reclassitication of the above-described
property from the RM-1200 (RESIDENTIAL, MUITIPLE-FAMILY) ZONE to the CL (COMMERCIAL,
LIMI'iED) ZONE.
2. That the Anaheim General Plan designates the subject property for
general commercial uses.
3. That the proposed reclassification of subject property is necessary and/
or desirable for the orderly and proper development of the community.
4. That the proposed reclassification oT subject properYy does properly
relate to the zones and their permitted uses locally established in close
proximity to subject property and to the zones and their permitted uses generally
established throughout the community.
5. That the proposed reclassification ef subject property requires the
dedication and improvement of abuttirg streets in accordance with the Circulation
Element of the Anaheim General Plan, due to the anticipated increase in tratfic
which will be generated by the intensification of land use.
6. That the developer stipulated rhat any parking area lighting wili be
down-lighted from a maximum height of twelve feet (12'), which lighting will be
directed away from the property lines to protect the residential integrity of the
area.
7. That the developer was apprised of Che fact that other similar uses have
had to place their air-conditioning and refrigeration equipment on the inside of the
structures in order to be able to meet the Code requirement that the noise level
at the property line shall not exceed 60 dbA and, thereupon, the developer
stipulatFxl that the proposal wouid meet the Code requirements regarding noise and,
additionally, that any such mechanical eqiiipment would be buffered and screened
from view.
8. That the developer stipulated that a letter of agreement will be submitted
to ~i~e City Attorney's Office for approval and subsequently filed and recorded in
the Office of the Orange County Recorder, said agreement to insure that in the
event the adjacent property to the south is develoaed with a residential use, then
a.six-foot (6') high masonry wall will be constructed along the south property
line by the subject property owner(s) and said wall will be reduced ±o thirty
inches (3o") within the setback area adjacent to Anaheim Boulevard.
9. That the developer stipulated that deliveries to the subject property
will be restricted to daylight hours between 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m.
10. That, upon request by the Planning Commission, the developer stipulated that
the subject property will be developed precisely in accordsnee with plans and
specifications marked Exhibit Nos. 1, 2 and 3.
Il. That one (1) person appeared at said public hearing in opposition t~
subject petition and, subsequently, Hiithdrew the objections; and no correspondence
was received in opposition to subject petition.
RESOLUTION N0. PC75-44
~ ~
IiPiV(RONPI6NTAL LMPACT REPORT 1'INDING:
That ~lie Planning Commission recommends to the City Council that the sul~jec~
project Ue exempt from the requirement to prepare an Environmental Impacl Report,
pursuant to the provisions of the California Hnvironmental Quality Act.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED thnt the Anaheim City Planning Commission does
hereby recommend to the City Council of tl:e City of 6naheim that subject Petition
for Reclassification be approved and, by so doing, that Title Y8-Zoning of tlie
Anaheim Municipal Code be amended to exclude the above-described property from the
RPi-12'00 (FESIDEbiTIAL, MULTIPLE-FAMILY) ZONE and to incorporste said described property
into the CL (COMMEFCIAL,.LIMITED) ZONE upon the following conditions which are hereby
found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of subject property in order
to preserve the safety and general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim:
1. That the owner(s) of subjecL• property shall deed to the City of Anaheim
a strip of land 45 feet in width from the centerline of the street along Anaheim
Eoulevard including a?5-foot property line return for street widening purposes.
2. That the owner(s) of subject property shal.l pay~ to the Ci.ty of Anahe£m
the sum of $2.00 per front foot along Anahelm Bouievard and South Stree~ for street
1i.ghting purposes.
3. That the owner(s) of sub3ect property shall pay to the City of Anaheim
the sum of 60C per front foot along Anaheim Boulevard and South St.reeC for tree
planting purposes,
4. That fire hydrants shall be installed :,nd cnarged es required and determined
to be necessary by the Chief of tiie Fire DepartmenG prior to commencement of structural
f.raming.
5. That subject property shall he served by undei:•ground uti~ities.
6. That nny parking area lighting shall be down-li~E:te~ froie a iraxi'mum height
of twelve feet (12'), which lighting shail be directed away frfnu tne ~rcpertp 13.nE~ t~
protect the residential integrity of the area, as stipulated to hy 't•tic de~hr:~~.~per.
7. That curbs shail be repaired alor.g South ~wtrz:et as req;.iir,2d b'y ~hL City
Engineer and in accordance with standa:?d ;.1.<~ss and sp•°cificatione on fi:c in the office
ot L•he City Engineer.
S. That drainage of subject property shall be disposed of in a manne: sarisfactory
L•o the City Engineer.
~. ThaC trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans
on file with the office of the Director of Pt~'~lic Works.
10. That all air-conditioning, refrigerstion and any other mechanical equipment
shall be properly shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent propertiea
to achieve a maximum of 60 dbA at ttie property line, as stipulated to by Che developer.
11. Tha~ the property owner(s) shall submit a letter of agreement Lo the City
Attorney's Office for approval, said agreement to inaure that in the event the adjacent
properky to the south is developed with a residential use, then a six-foot (6~) high
maaonry wu1Z shall be constructed along Che south property line by the subject property
nwner(s) and snid wali shall be reduced tu thirty i.nches (30") within the setback area
adiacent to Anaheim Boulevard, and said agreement shall be filed and recorded in the
Office of the Orange Cocnty Recorder.
12. Tfiet subject property ahall be developed precisely in accordance with plans
and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit Nos. 1, 2, end 3,
as stipulaYed to by the developer.
13. Prior to the introduction of an ordinance rezoning subject proper[y, Cunditions
Nos. 1, 2, and 3, above-mentioned, shall be completed. The provisions of rights grented
by this resolution shall become null and void by accion of the City Council unless said
conditions are complied wiYh within one year from tbe date hereof, or such further time
as the City Council may grant.
-2-
RESOLUTION N0. PC75-44
0
~
14, That Conditions Nos. 5, 6, 7, S, 9, 10, 11, and 12, above-mentioned, shall
Uc ~omplied with prior to final building and zoning insFections.
15. That deliveries to the subject prnperty shall be restricted to daylight
hours between 8:00 a.m, and 5:09 p.m., as stipulated to by the developer.
Tt~ FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 3rd day of March, 1975.
,~~ .
C N, A C NNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
~~~~ ~~~
SECRETARY, ANAHEITt CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIPORN7A ' )
COUNTY OP OttANGE ) es•
CITY 0~' ANA.HEIM )
I, PAtricia B. Scanlan, Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the City
of Anaheim, do hereUy cer•~ify that the foregoin~; resolution was passed and adopted
at a meeting of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, held on
March 3, 1975, at 1:30 p.m., by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYRS: COMhiISSIONERS: FARANO, GAUER, JOHNSON, KING, HERBST
NOES: CONfMISSI0NER5: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: MORLEY, TOL~1R
IN WITNESS WIi~~.~OF, I have hereunto set my liand thia 3rd day of March, 1975.
. ~~%•/ C A~l~~ ~/(.w•%~/y ~/~i~SJ
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING CCMMISSION
-3-
RESOLUTION N0. PC75-44