PC 75-5~ ~
RESOLUTlON TO.__._: P~75-5
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNfNG COM~7ISSYON OF THE CITI 0~' ANr+HEIM
RECOMMEND~i+iG TO THE CITY CGb'NCIL OF''I`}iE C::Y OF ANAHEIM THAT
PETITlON FOR RECLASSIFICATION NQ. rk'75" ~ 9 BE APPROVED
WHEREAS, tne City Planning Commiseion of the City of Aneheim did receive e verified PeEltion for Reclessifice-
ticnfram LAWRENCE A. MUCKEN7HALFR et t~l, 1539 Avolen~ia Drive, Fullert6n, California 92632
(Owne~); GREAT OAK IJESTERN CORPORATION, Attn: Robert Anderson, 912 Park Circle, Anaheim,
Califotnia 928114 a~d STEPHEN GALLAGHER, 106 North Claudlna St"reet, #3p5, Anahe3m, California
92805 (Agents) of certain real properxy sit;~ated in the City of Anaheim, County of
Orange, State of Califcrnia, desc~rioed as THAT ?ORTION OF THE SOUTH HALF OF TH~ SOUTHWEST
QUARYER QF THE NORT.HWEST QISARTER OF SECT!OIJ 9, TOWNSHIP 4.SOU7H, RANG~ 10 WEST IN THE,RANCMO
SAN JUAN CA'ON D'c SANTA ANA, AS PER NAP RiCORDEa IN BOOK 51 AAGE 10 OF MISC[~.'~ANEOUS MAPS
IN THE OFFIC: OF TR~ COUNTY RECORDER OF SAlD COUNTY, DESCRIB~D AS FOLLOWS;
sE61NNING AT THE ~OU7HEAST CORNER OF SAID SOUTN IiALF; THENCE WEST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF
SAID SOUTH HALf TO THE SOIiTHEAST CORNER OF THE LAND DESCRIBED IN THE DEED TO H. LEROX HALL
f.T UX., RECORDED M/+RCH 13> 1930 IN BOOK 360 PAGE 385 OF OFFICIAL RE~OR65; 7HENCE NORTH
ALONG THE EAST LIR'~ OF SAID LAND OF HALL AND ALONG THE EAST LINE OF PAf:CEL 1 OF THE LAND
D•ESCRIBED IN THE D'eE0 TO FLOYG ~1. HATFI,~LD ET UX., RECORGE~ APRIL 25. 1935 IN BUOK 745 PA6E
445, OfFICIAL RECOFCS TO 7HE NORTH LINE OF SA{D SOUTH HALF; THENCE EAST ALONG SAID NORTH
I..INE 19 TNE NOR7HEAS~~ CORNER OF SAID 50UTH HA~F; THENCE SOUTH ALONG TWE EAST LINE OF SAID
50'UTH HALf TO THE POINT 9f BEGINNING.
EXCEPT THE NORTH 230.00 FEET THEREOF.
Al.SO EXCE°T THAT ?ORTIU~V THEREUF DESCRIBEO IN A DEED TO LAWRENCE A. MUCKENTHALER, JR., ET
Al., RE.r.4R[?cD DECEMBER 31, 1968 IN BQOK '683~+ P~+GF 117 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS
; end
WHEI~EP.S, the City Planning Commission dia hold e~ublic hearing ot the Cily Hell in the CSty oE Aneheim on
Ja~:~~z~ry b, 1975~ ~et 2:00 o'clo~k 'P.M. no!iee af aeid oubiic hearing hFVing been daly given es :equired by
lew and in eccordence wlth tVie provisiona of 4he Anefieim Municipol Code, Chapter 1;~,0~ to F.ear ead conslder evidence
tor aud egeinat said ptoposed ceclessificetfon end to investtgate und make findings end secom~er~detfons !n connection
lherewith; e~d
WHERSAS, seld Commission, eEter due inspectlon, invesNgntion, and study mede by Itselt end in tts behelf, end
afte[ due consideretlon of ell evt'denae end ceporte aEfered at seid heering, does ficid end di;termine tha following facts:
1. Thst.hepetitiunecpmposes reclassifi¢ation of subject property from the CL (COMMERCIAL,
LIMITED) to the R11-t200 !RESIDENTIAL, M~!LTIPLE-FAMILY) ZONE.
2. That, although the Anahetm General Plan designates the subJect property ,`or
aeneral commercial Nses, the proposed zonin~ is deemed to 'be appropriate at the s~bJect
locatiu~, and approprfate astlon will be taken to reflect the change in land use policy
by amending the Anaheim G.r.neral Plan.
3, That the patitioner stipulated that a s(x-foot (6~) htgh masonry walt will bc
constructed along the entire westerly boundary of the subJect property and atong the
property iine abutting the westerly and north•erly boundaries af the adJacent service station
site lucated at the southeast worner of the subJect property.
~+. Thet the propoaed reclassiflcetion of ssbject pcoperty is neceseary end/or desirbble for the orderly and pro•
per development of the community.
y. Thet the yroposed reclasslficutfon af subject pcoperty doea properly ralale to the zones end their permitted
usea locnlly estebllshed in close proximity to tubJect prop2rty and to the zortea and thelr permitted uses generelly estab-
liahed throughout the community.
6. That the .Qroposed reclassification of subJect property reyu(res the dedicatinn
a~td improvement ~f abutti~y streets ano/ar alleys in accordance wtth the Circulation Element
of the Gene-al Plan, duz t~ the antic(pated increase in traffic which w(11 be generated by
f,he intens~f~~:ation of land us~.
7, That no one indicated •iheir ~resence at said pwblic hearing In oFposition an: no
correspondence was recefved in opposl,".1on to subJP~t petlti4.~.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FINDING:
Thet the Planning Commission recommends to the City Council that~the subject project be
exempt from the requirement "co p.repare an Environmenial Impact Report pursuant to the
provtsions o£ the California Environmental Quality Act.
.1. RESO~UTIOH N0. PC75-5 DEV-86•d.
R-A '
I
•10W, T!1EREFpRE, BE ~RESOLVED ehat ih~ Anah~e?m C:ty~nning Cammis5inn does~ hereby
rer_ommend to the City Council of the City of Rnak~efan th3t sub~~c*_ ?etit(on F~or RQClasfifl-
cation be approved and, by so doing tha"t Titi~ i8-Eaniqg o'f the Anahelm Muniedpal Code
be amended to exclude the above-described prApP_rCY fr4rn th~e CL (COMMERCIAL, LV"117ED)
ZONE and to incarporate said described proper2y J~n.to the RM-1200 (RcSiDE?~TIl.L, MI~LTR?LE-
FF,MILY) ZGNE upon the following conditions wn3:ch ase hereby found Lo 6F ~ nete:sary pre-
requisite to the proposed ~se of subJect prepesty 1n order ~o ~rese~rvp t.Pte safe'cy and
general welfare af the Cltizers of the ~ity o% :~nah~e~mt
1. That tne owner(s) of subject propert+~~ sha]2 de~d to the C6t~ ~r ~naheim a strip
of ~and 32 feet in width from the centerli~ne of the street alvr.~ Loara St~reet f~,r str~ec
widening purposes,
2. That sidewalks shall 5e instalted al~ig Loaru Street .a~s required by tfie City
Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and sFetlficatlons on file dn the snfficW of
the City Engineer.
3, That the owner(s) of subject praperty sha'li pa,V to ths City of A.ra'n~i±n •Lhe sum of
60C per ~ront foot along Loara Street 3nd Crescent Avenue fo~r tree p~antlr,g•purpases.
' 4. That trash storage areas shall be provided (n accordance with approved plans on
file with the office of the Director of Public Works.
5. Thatfire hydrants shall be installed and charged as rEquired and determined to be
necessary by the Cnief of ~he Fire Department prior to commencement of structural framing.
6, That subject~property shall be served by underground utilitiE,s.
7, That drainage of subJect property shall be disposed of in a manner satisfactory
to the City Engineer.
8. That the owner(s) of subJc~t property shall ~,cy to the Cit,y of Anaheim the
appropriate park and recreatinn in-lieu fees as determincd to be appropriate by the City
Cpuncil, said fees to be paid at the time the building permit is issued,
3, That completton of :hese reclassificatlon proceedings is contingent upan the
granting of Variance No. 2665.
10. That street lighting facilities along Loara Street shall be installed as required
by the Director of Public Utilities end in accordance with standard plans and specificatt~ns
on file in the Office of the Director of Public Utilltles and tha~ s bond ii; an amount and
form SatiSfactory to the City of Anaheim shall be pcsted with the City to guarantee the
installatio~n of the above-mentioned requirements.
11. That tha owc~er(s) of subJect property shall pay to the City sf Anaheim the sum of
$2.00 per front foo~ along Crescent Avenue for street lighting purposes,
i2. That subJect property sfiall be deve)oped substa~tfally in accordance wi•ih plans
and specifications ~~ file with the City of A~aheim marked Exhibit Nos. 9, 2 3nd 3;
provided, however, that a six-foot (6~) high masonry wa~ll shall be constructed along the
e~tire westerly property line and along che property 11ne a~utting the wes,terly and
northerly bounciaries of the adjacent serv?ce station stfe located at the southeast corner
c,P su~Jcct praperty, as stipulated to by the petitioner.
13. ?riar t~ the fntrod~ct~an of an ordinance rezoning subJect property,.Condition
Nos, i, 3, 9, ~0 a~~ ~1, above-meritlGned, shall be coripleted. The provisians or righis
granted by ehis reYOtution sha;l 'becn~+'~r.• nul' and void by actisn oP the City Counc'il unless
said conditions are rarrtpiiKd wEtix wltf,iti onE y~s~ from the date hereof, or such furthcr
time as the Gity C~uncii nay 3rer~i,
i4, That Condition Nos: 2, w, ~, 7 and #2, aL•~v~.-r~entfor.ed, sha~ll be complied with
prlor to 'rinal building and zoning tnsoecttons.
THE FOREGGING RESOLUTION is signed and approved k~y me t is 6th day af January, 19~5. ,
i ;
CH IRMAN ANA EI CIT LANNING COMMISSION ~
~~~~ ~~~
SECR~ETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION _2, RES~LUTION N0. PC75~5
~ ~
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Patricia B. Scanlan, Secrexary of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim,
do hereby certify that the foregofng resolutior was passed and adopted at a m~atir.g of
the City Planning Commission uf the City of Anaheim, hel~ on January ~, 1975, at 2:00
o'ciock p.m., by the following vote of the members 2hereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: FARANO, GAUER, JOHNSON, KiNG, MORLEY, TOL~~R, HERBST
NOE~: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMi5510NER5: NONE
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 6th day of January, 1975.
~ ~ ~ ~ w • ~~-s/
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CI PIANNING COMMISSION
_3- RESOLUTION N0, PC75-5