PC 75-8RESOLU~J NU. PC75-8 ~
A RESO;..UTION OF TNE CITY PLANNING COMMISSIOP! OF THE CiTY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT_~ ~~~BE GRANTED I N PART
IVHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City oE Aneheim did receive a verified Petition for Con-
ditionalUse Permittrom OTTIS E. PITTMAN, 1621 North Lindendale Avenue, Fullerton, Catifornia
92631 (Owner) of certain real property. sitauted in the City of Anaheim, Count;~ of Orange,
State of California. described as That portion of Lot 35 of Hazard's Subdivision, as shown
on amended Map of Richfield filed in Bo~k l, page 26 of Record of Surveys in Che office of
the County Recorder of Orange County, California, described as follows:
Beginning at a poinC 256.23 feet North of the Southeast qu~rter of said Lot 35; thence
Northerly along the Easterly boundary line of said Lot 35, 256.24 feet; thence Westerly,
parallel to the Sc,utherly line of said Lot 35, 850 feet; thence 5outherly parallel to the
Easteriy boundary line of said Lot 35, 256,24 feet; thence Easterly 850 feet to the point
of beginning
; and
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold e public hearing at the City Hall in the City o( Annheim
on Janua ry 6, 1975, at 2:00 o'clock P.M11., notice of said public hearing heving been duly given
us required by law and in accordonce with the provisions o(!he Anaheim hiunicipal code, Chepter 18.03,to hea:
and censider evidence Eor and egeinst said proposed conditional use end to investigate and make findin~s and
recommendations in connection therewith; and
1i'HEREAS, said Commission, a[ter due inspection, investigation, and study mede by itsel! and in its bc-
halE, end after due consideretion oE ell evidence end reports offered at said hesring, docs find end determine the
following fact~:
1. Thet the proposed use is properly one for which a Conditional Use Permit is euthorized by Co~je Secl' i on
18.61.050.507, to wit; permit a maintenance and stora~e yard for heavy equipment in the I•1L
Zone, with waivers of:
a, SECTION 18.61.020 - Permitted structures. (1lobile units not permitted)
b. SECTION 18.61.064.020 - Permitted fence location. (50 feet from front setback
required; 0 feet existing)
c, SECTION 18.61.068.030 - Minimum front setback. (50 feet required; 10 feet
proposed)
d. SECTION 18.61.068•030 - Enclosure of outdoor uses. (6-foot chainlink fenc:<:
interwoven with wooden slats required; 6=font clain-
link without wooden slats existing)
2. That Waiver 1-a, above-ment~oned, is hereby granted for a period of one (1) ya~r,
following which time safd waiver shall be subject to ~eview and consideration for exte:~s'on
of time, upon request by the pEtitioner; and said mobile units shall be installed in ~~?;~-
formance with State requirements.
3. That Waiver 1-b, above-mentioned, is hereby granted for a period of on~~ (I? year,
following which time and upon request by the petftioner, con.ideration may be given as to
whether the waiver should be extended; and subject to the petitioner posting a bond to
guarantee the removal of the existing fence in the front setback and public right-of-way;
and subject to the petitioner obtaining an encroachment permit r'or said fence.
4. That Waiver 1-c, above-mentioned, is hereby granted in part, permittin9 th~
exsiting fence in the front setback and petitioner having stipulated to no trucks cr othcr
heavy equipment being stored in the front setback, for a period of one (l) year, following
which time and upon request by the petitioner, consideration may be given as to whether the
waiver should be extended.
5. That Waiver 1-d, above-mentloned, was withclrawn by the petitioner witfi the
stipulation that redwood or cedar slats wi11 be installed in the existing six-foot (G')
chainlink fence on'all four (4) s~des, to properly screen the proposed use from vie~;,
-1-
RcSOLUTION N0. P~75-8
_ - ~ ~
6. That the proposed use is hereby Sranted for a period of one (I) year, after which
time and upon request by the petitioner an additional period of time may be granted.
7. That the proposed use, as granted, will noi advcrsely affect the adjoining land
uses and the gro~ath and development of the area in which it is propos~d to be located.
8. That the size and shape of the site proposed for the use, as granted, is adequate
Lo allow the full development of the proposed use in a manner not detrimental to the par-
ticular area nor to the peace, health, safety, and general welfare of th~ Citizens of the
City of Anaheim.
9. That the Conditional Use Permit, as granted, and under the conditions imposed, if
any, will not be detrimental to the peace, health, safety, and general welfare of the
Citizens of the City of Anaheim.
10, That no one indicated their presence at said pu6lic hearing in opposition, and no
correspondence was received in opposition to subject petition.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FINDIN6:
That the Planning Commission recommends to the City Council that the subject project be
exempt from the requirement to prepare an Environmental. Impact Report pursuant to the
provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Flanning Commission does hereby
grant in part subject Petition for C~nditional Use Permit, upon.tihe following conditions
which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the subject
property in order to preserve the safety and general welfare of thP Citizens of the Cit;~ of
Anaheim:
l. That the owner(s) of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim.a strlN
of land 45 feet in width from the centerline of the street along Jefferson Street for street
widening purposes.
2. That all engineering requirements of the City of Anaheim along Jefferson SCreet
including pre~aration of improvement plans and installation of all improvements such as
curbs and gutters, sidewalks, street grading and paving, drainage facilities, or other
appurtenant werk shall be complied with as required by the City Engineer and in accordanr,e
with standard plans and specifications on file in the Office of the City Engineer; that
street lighting facilities along Jefferson Street shall be installed as required by the
Director of Public Utilities, and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on
file in the Office of the Direccor of Public Utilities and that a bond in an amount and
form sztisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall be posted with the City to guarantee Che
instaliation of the above-mentioned requirements.
3. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance wit•h approved plans on
file with the Office of the Director of Public Works.
4. That fire hydrants shall be installed and charged as required and determined to be
necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department prior to commencement of structural framing.
5. That subject property shall be served by underground utilities.
6. That drainage of subject property shall be disposed of in z manner saLisfactory
to the City Engineer.
7. That the m~bile units shall be installed in conformance with State requirements.
8. That the property owner(s) shall post a bond immediately to guarantee removai of
the existing fencing in the front setback and public right-of-way along Jefferson Street.
9. That the owner(s) of subject property shall obtain an encroachment permit for the
existing fence located in the public right-of-way along Jefferson Street,
10., In the event that subject property is to be divided for the purpose of sale,
lease, or financing, a parcel map, to record the approved division of subJect property shall
be submitted to and approved by the City of Anaheim and then be recorded in the Office of
the Orange County Recorder.
11. That this conditional use permit is granted subject to the completion of Reclass-
ification No. 70-71-47(14).
12. That these conditional use permit proceedings are granted subJect to completion
of annexation of subject property to tF~e City of Anaheim. ,
-2- RESOLUTION N0, PL75-~
~
.. .. _ ~ ,~
13. 'ihat subject property shatl be developed substantially in accordance with plans
and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit ~os, l, 2 and 3;
provided, hooiever, that redwood or cedar slats shall be ~nterwoven in the existing six-
foot (6') high chainlink fence which encloses the subject property on•four (4) sides.
14. That Condition f.;os. 1, 2, ll and 17., above-mentioned, shall be complied with prior
to the commencement of the activi~y authorized under this resolution, or prior to the time
that the build(ng permit is issued, or within a period of one (1) year from date hereof,
whichever oc~urs first, or such further time as the Planning Commission and/or City Louncil
may grant.
15. That Condition Nos. 3, 5, 6~ 7, 8~ 9 and 13, above-mentioned, shall be complied
with prior to final building and zoning inspections.
16. That a time limitation of one (1) year is granted for the use of mobile units and
the waivers as approved; after which time and upon request by the petitioner, consideration
may be given as to whether the waivers should be extended,
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 6th day of January, 1975.
CH IRMAN ANA CI NNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
~ ~ ~
SECRETRRY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUWTY OF ORANGE ) ss,
CITY OF ANAHEINi )
I, Patricia B. Scanlan, Secretary of the City Plar~ning Commission of the City nf Anaheim,
do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the
City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, held on January 6, 1975, at 2:00 o'clock
p.m., by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS; FARANO, GAUER, JOHNSON, KiivG; MORLEY, TOLAR, HERBS7
NOES: f,OMMISSI0NER5: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS; NONE
IN WITPIESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 6th day of January, 1975.
~~~-~J,~ ~
SECRETARY ANAHE'~hl CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
-3- RESOLUTfON N0. PG','S-a