PC 76-100~ ~
rtcso~uTin~i r~n, PC7~-ln'1
A RESOLUTIOP~ QF THE AtIANEI!1 CITY PLA"UIIN~ COHMI5510'~
THAT PETITIOt! F~R VARIAPICE N0, 2R~~ BF ~RAt~TE~, I~~ Pnr.T.
IJHE!tEAS, the Anaheim City Planninq Commissinn cii~i rrcPivr. a vrrified
Petition for Variance from R~[3ERT AtdD f1~P,OTHY r,~nssF.ll. 1101 O.uail S[rr.et, Suite inn~
Nea~port Beach, Lalif~rnia ~12F~Q (Owners); R~~N HARTItI r, ASSnf.., 1"•^i NP~~~nnrt
Boulevard, Costa Hesa, California ~?G27 and CR~b! PACIFIC pFVEL~PHE!!T C~"P~4~TIn'~,
2171 Campus Drive, Suite 33~, irvine, California ~771~ (/1~ents) nf cr.rtain r~~l
property situated in the City of Ana!~ein, County of (lrannr., St.+.te of ~alif~rnia
described as:
PARCEL 1: '
Lots i Chrough 5~, 75 through °2, T^, A, R an~i thosr_ n~rtions ~f Lots ~1, 7', ?~',
"3. ~0 and C, lyin~ Westerly of thr. East~rly line of thr, land drscrihr.d in thc
exception from ttir. land describe~i in n Deed ~f Trust, rec~rded ~ctntier 31, 1^7^
in book lOhQ3, Page 921 of ~fficial Records, all beinn ~ ~art nf Tract ~~o. ^1^1,
as shown on a'iap recordr.d in beok 33^, n:~pes ~~1 throu~h 1~~ incl~~sivr., c,°
Niscellaneous '1aps, rrcords of said Orangr. County, California.
WHEREAS, the City Plannin~ Commission did schedul~ a nuhlic tir:~rinq ~t the
City Hall in the City of Anaheim ~n Itay 1~, 1^7~, at 1:3~ p.m.~ n~tice ~f s~i~t nuhlic
hearing having been duly given as required by lat•~ anci in accor~lnncr ~•iitli the
provisions of the Anaheim tlu~icipal Code, Chaptc:r 1".~13, tn hr.ar and cnnsider
evidence for and aaainst said ~ronos~ed variance and to investig~te anri nal~.P fin~linas
and recommendati~ns in connection therewith; safd puhlic hearing liavtnn h°-Pn
continued to [he Planning Comnission meeting of Hay 2h, tA7~.; and
UHF.REAS, said Commission, after duc inspection, inv~stiqati~n and stu~lv n~~r.
by itself and in its hehaif, and after due c~nsideration of all evi~lence and rr,nnrts
offered at said hearing. does find and determin~ the foll~~~in~ facts:
i, That the petitioner proposes the follrn~ing waivrrs frnm [he An~h~im
Municipal Code, to establish a 3~-lot, 33-unit RS-5~~~(SC) subAivision:
a. SECTIQN 13.7.7.~(i1.921 - Mintmum lot ~aidth.
b. SECTIOt1 1^,7.7.'1(~3.~12h - tllnimum aranc setback. (25 frr.t
rPquired; 1Q ePt prnpos~~-
e, SEf,TIOfI 13.7.7.~~5.~1~ - Rr, uirement that lnts rear-on arteri~l
highwavs. ~ne stde-on lot pr~pocPd
7. That l•laiver 1-a, above-mentionn.d, aias eliminatr.d by the suhmissinn n` .+,
ne~•~ tentative tract map prior to consider~tion nf tl~is it~m at thr. Plnnninn
Cnmmi~sion public hearing.
3. That Waiver 1-h, ahove-mentioned, is herehy granted for one lnt on the
basis that th^. petittoner stinulated to providing a three-car naraqe in acc~rrlancr.
o-~ith all Code provisionsfor front-on garaves located closer than 25 fr.et t~ thr. frnnt
property line.
1~. That Waiver 1-c, ahove-mentione~l, is hereby grante~l ~n tlir hasis that
the affected lot (~lo. i on the tentative m~p) is at a qr~de rlevation of
approx(mately four feet above the adJacent arterial liighway (Serrann /lvenue); an~i,
furthcrmore, the Planning Commission has previously granted similar ~ia{vers.
y. That the Planning Commisston ~Ines hereby recommencl to the CiCV Council
that City Councll Policy No. ~33 requiring a forty ~!i'1) foot r~inimum huildinq sethacl-
adJacent to arterial highways he ~•~aived t~ p~rnit the prnposed taienty-onc (21) fnnt
sPtbick on Lot No. 1 of the tentativc map~ said lot hPing idjacent to Serran~ Avrnur,
on tiie basis that slmilar waivers have prrviously he~n granted ~.~herP i arirl~
~fiffcrential was present.
~,. That there ~re exceptional or extranrdinary circumstancrs er con~litinns
a~plicable to the propcrty involve~l or tn the intended use, as ~r~ntr.d, nf tho
^,F.SnL!~71n!J Nr, n''~'-1~n
. .
~ ~
property that do not apply generally to the prorerty ~r cl~ss ~f usr in th~ same
vicinity and zone.
7, That the requested variance, ns ~rintr_d, is nrcr,ssary f~r thr.
preservation and enjoyment of a substantial ~rn~erty rtAlit ~oase.ssP~1 hy ~thrtr
property in the same vicinity an~1 zone, and ~fenied t~ the pr~perty in questi~n,
$. That the requeste~i vari~nce, as ~lrantr.A, ~•~ill not he m:+trrially
detrimental t~ the pu6lic o-~elfare or injurious t~ the aronerty ~r imnr~vemPnts in
such vicinity and zone in which the nroperty is l~cated.
9. That no one indicated t`~eir presence at sa1~1 pul,lic hnarinn tn
oppositinn; and no correspondence was rr.ceivr~i in ~ppositt~n to suh~ect nrtition.
Et7V I Rntl!~Et1TAL I ~1PAC7 REPORT F I tl~ I HG:
That Fnvironmental Im~act Report ~do. 175, sunolementina tt~ster Elr tlo. °^,
having been considered this date hy the Anaheim Clty Planninn Comnissinn ~n~
evidence, both written and oral, havinq heen presentpd to sunplemFnt said ~ir~Ft EI'
No. 175, the Planning Commission belleves that said draft EIR ~I~. 175 ~1nes con`nrn tn
the City anrl State Guidelines and the Stite c+f Califnrnia Envir~nmr.ntal f1u~11tv Act
and, based upnn such information, does hereby recommend to th~ City Council thnt thev
certify said FIR is in conpliancr with said Fnvironmental RuTiity Act.
~7~U, THEREF(?RE, BE IT RESQLVED that the Anaheim f,ity Plannin~ C~nissinn
does hereby grant, in part, suhject Petitlon for Varlance, un~n th~ °e+llrn•rinn
conditicrns which are herehy found t~ he a necessary prerevuisite tn the prnnos~d us~
of the subJect property in order t~ ~reserve the safety and ~enera) welf~rr. ~f the
Citizens nf the City of Anaheim:
1. That sub.j~ct property shall he devel~peA substantially in ~ccorclancc
viith plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim m~rked F.xhih~t flo. 1;
provided, however, that the minimum huilding sethack on Lot tio. 1 nf thr tentativ~
map shall be a minimum of forty (4~) feet adj~cent to Serrann Av~nue, per Citv
Council Policy Ilo. 53'i, unless the City Council walves said pnlicy anci oermits thc
proposed twentY~one (?.1) f~ot huildinn sett,ack f~r sai~l lot.
THF FORE~OIN~ RESQLUTI0~1 is sirynPrl and apprnvr.d by me this ''.~~th day ~f
Nay, 1976.
ifi~'' l ~ 7~~~ir~r'~'d
ci~niR~+n~T, ar~ r,er+ ciT'f PL/1~l~lltl^ c^~+~~issi^r~
ATTEST:
C~ . ' ,~.~~,~,
SECRETARY, ANANt I N C ITY PLAtltl I!r, COM~1 I SS I Otl
STATE nf CALIFORtIIA )
COII~ITY OF ORI1t+GE )ss.
C I TY OF APIAHE I N )
I, Patricia D. Scanlan, Secrrtary of the City Planninq f.ommissinn of the
City of An~heim, do hereby certify that the forr.~ning resoluti~n r~as DASSC~I :+n~i
adopted at a meeting of the City Planning Lommission of the City of Anaheim, hrld c+n
tlay 24, 1976, at 1:3~ P.m., hy the follor~ing vote of the memhers thr.rF~f;
AYES: COMM1551nHERS: BART~LS, ftEP,rST, K1Nr,~ TpLAR, f.neas~n
NOES; COMMISSIOt7ERS: N~~IE
ABSENT: CQMMISSIOHERS: JOFI~ISO~a, HORLEY
IG WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this :'.4th ~1~y of !1ay, 1^7~.
(/ti:.i~~ ~~C.~~Ct~c~
SECRETARY, ApAIIF I~~ C I Y~L11rlN I Hr, Cn~~~11 SS I n~~
-2. RF.S~UiTIDt! tIQ. PC7!-lnn