PC 76-113~ ~
RES01_UTION N0. PC75-113
A RESOLUTI(1N OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLAtJNING COM'11SSION
RELOM"1ENDING TO TIiE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEI'1
THAT PETlT~iON FOR RECLASSIFILATION N0. 75-76-37 BE APPROVED.
WHEREAS, the Anaheim Clty Planning Commisslon did initiate a vr.rified
Petition for Reclassification on certain real property situated in the County of
Orange, State of Lalifornia described as:
Commencing at the northwesterly corner of the Mohler Drive No. 2 Annexation to
the City of Anaheim, said northwesterly corner also being the northeasterly
corner of the Mohler Drive No. 4 Annexation to the City of Anaheim; thencF
leaving said 14ohler ~rive No. 2 Annexation boundary and following along a portion
of the northerly line of the Mohler Drive No. 4 Annexation boundary to the City
of Anaheim 5 69° 10' 30" IJ, 135.2L feet to the true point of beginning; thence
continuing alon9 a portion of the northerly annexation boundary line of said
Mohler Drive No. 4 Annexation and the northwesterly prolonyation thereof, the
following courses and distances: 5 4° 04' ~0" 4!, 20.~0 feet; 5 5R° 2%,' nn~~ W,
133.32 feet; thence N 7;° 45' 3~J" W. 27h•~3 feet to a point in a line distant PI
77° 45' 30" W, 52.13 feet from the north~•iesterly corn~r of the land of Carl
Heriman, as sho~an on a map of survey recorded in Book 54, page 1~, Recor~l of
Surveys, in the office of the County Recorder of said ~range County, said point
being in the northwest corner of Lot 9 in Tract 117, as shown on a map recorded
in Book 11, page 15, Miscelianeous Maps, records of said Orange County, said Lot
9 and Lots t to 17 of said Tract No. 117 are also shown on a map oi' survey
recorded in Book 17, page 3, Record of Surveys, in the office of the County
Recorder of said Orange Count/; thence follo~ring along a portion of the
southwesterly line of Lot 13 in said Tract ~~o. 117 N 52° 09~ 00" W, 253•Q1 feet;
thence N 25° 5~' 0~" W~ 75.~F0 feet to an intersection tiaith the southerly line of
the lard described in Parcel One in the deed recorded Harch 18, 1955 in Book
;000, pages 33~ through 340, Official Records; thence follo~oing along the
southerly line of the land described in the ~ast mentioned deed N 71° ll2' '1~" E,
379.OG feet; thence N 52~ 55' 00" E, 126.~1 feet to an intersection with t!~e
westerly line of Parcel One described in the deed recorded January 21, lq~~i in
Book 6a99, pages 139 through 143, Official Records; thence along the westerly
line of the land described in said deed 5 1° 43' 0f1" E, 311.3~ feet; thence S
61° 43' 0(l" E, 165.~1 feet along the line described in said exception to the true
point of beginning.
41HEP,EAS, the f,ity Planning Commission did hold a publlc hearing at the City
Halt in the City of Anaheim on ~une 7, 197h, at 1:3~ P.m., notice of said pubiic
hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the
provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 9K.03, to hear and consider
evidence for and against said proposed reclassification and to investigate and make
findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made
by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports
offered at said hearing, does find and determtne the following facts: ,
1. That the Anaheim City Planning Commission proposes a reclassification
of the above-described property, From the COtINTY OF ORAPJfE irJ0-E4-20~000 (SMALL
ESTATES) DISTRICT to the CITY OF ANAHEIM RS-HS-22,000(SC) (RESIDEPlTIAL, SINGLf.-
FAMILI' HILLSIDE - SCFNIC COR(iIDOP. OVERLAY) ZONE.
2. That the Anahetm General Pl:yn designates sub)ect property for low-
density residential uses.
3. That the proposed reclassification of subJact property is ne~ess~ry
and/or desirable for the orderly and proper development of tfie community.
4. That the proposed reclassification of subJect property does properly
relate to the zones and their permitted uses locally est~blished tn close proximtty
to subJect property and to the zones and their permitted uses generally established
throughout the community.
5. That no one indicated their presence at said public hearing in
opposition; and no correspondence was received in opposition to subJect petition.
RESOLUTIOM N0, PC7f-113
h
~ ~
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FINDING:
That thc Anaheim City Planning Lommission does herehy rec~mmend to the City
Council of the City of Anaheim that the subJect nroject be exem~t from the
requirement to prepa~•e an environmental impact report, pursuant to the provisions of
the California Enviror,mentai Quaiity Act.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Plannin9 Commission
does hereby recommend to the City Council e` the City of Anaheim that sub,ject
Petition for Reciassificat~on be approved and; by so doing, that Title 1°-Zoning of
the Anaheim Muni~ipal Code be am^_nded to exclude the above~described prooerty from
the COUNTY OF ORANf,E 100-E~i-20,000 (S11ALL ESTATES) DISTRICT to the CITY ~F
A~AHEIM RS-H5~22~OQ0(SC) (RESIDEN7IAL, SIHGLE-FAr11LY NILLSIDF - SCFI~IC CORRIDQR
OVERLAY) ZONE~ unconditionally.
THE FOREG01"1G RESOLUTION is si~ned and approved by mr: this 7th ~fay of
June, 197b.
~,~ ~
CHA I Rh tJ, ANAH t•1 C I TY PLAtIP1 I tl6 CO!1M I SS I n~~
ATTEST:
~~
ECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNINf c~t~wis"sior~
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE )ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Patricia B. Scanlan, Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the
~~ty of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and
adopted at a meeting of ihe City Planning Com~ission of the City of Anaheim, held on
June 7, 1976, at 1:30 ~.m,, by the followtng vote of the members thereof:
AYES: ~~~u15SI0NER5: BARtlFS, HERBST, JOH~JSON~ ICItJG, MORLEY, TO:AR, FARAPIO
NOc.S: COMMISSIONF.RS: NONE
AdSEDIT: CUMMISSIONERS: tJONE
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 7th day of Jur~e, i475.
~
~~~ ~~
SECRET,ARY~ A"dAHEIM CI'~Y ?LANMING COMMfSS10~1
-?- RESOLUTIOPI N0. PC76-113