PC 76-149~ ~
Reso~uTiori no. rc76-~h~
A RESbLUTI~N OF THF APIAHEIM CITY PI.AMt•IING CQHMISSIQN
THAT PETITIOM FOR VARIkMCF I10. 2£i2~3 BF. ~RANTFD.
IJHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission did receive a verified
Pr.tition for liariance from TNF~DORE APID DEANHA TQDQROFF, 925 N, Anaheim Boulevard,
Anaheim, California 92~OS (Owners); AtJN T, MADISON, 6QQ S, Harhor 9o•;;evard, Anaheim.
California q2$05 (Agent) of certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim,
County of Oran~e, State of California ~lescribed as:
Lots ~ and iQ in Block B of Tract No. 143, in the City of Anaheim, County of
Oranae, State of California, as per map rocorded in Book 11, Page 3R of
Miscellaneous Maps, records of said County.
WHEREAS, the City Planning Comnission did hold a publ?c hearing at the City
Hall in the City of Anaheim on Au9ust 2, 197~, at 1:3n p,m., notice of said public
hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the
provisions of che An~heim 1lunicipal Code, Chapter 1f3,~3, to hear and consider
evidence for and against sai~l propnsed variance and to investigate and make findinas
and recomnendations in connection therr:t•~ith; and
WIIFREAS, sair! Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study ma~1e
by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideraCion of all evidence and reports
offered at said hearing, rloes find and determine the following fact::
1. That thc petitioner praposes the follaiing waiver from the Anaheim
Hunicipal Code, to le~ally establish two (2) autdoor automobile hoists:
SECTI011 18.~•5.~30 - Permitted accessor uses and structures.
Outdoor automobile hoists not permittecl)
2. That [he ahove-mentioned waiver is hereby granted for a time period to
expire April 22, 1977, sai~i er.piration date corresponding with the tir~e limitation
grant~d for Variance No. 2~~~3 whici~ permitted the ex.isting transmission and
automobile repair aiork facility at the subject service station site; and that the
time linitaCion est~blisheci for this variance shall be subject to review and
consideration for extension of time baseJ upon the status at the ti~e~e of the proposed
wiciening of La Palna Avenue ancl M aheim Boulevard, in which event the subject
property may he required to be de~~eloped in conformance with the site developrr~cnt
standards of the C~ Zone and the size and shape of the property may then not be
suitable for the proposed iase.
3. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions
applicable Co the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do
not apply ~enerally to the property or class of use in the same vicinity and zone.
~~. That the requested variance is necessary for the preservation and
enjoyment of a substantial pr~perty right possessed by other property in the same
vicinity and zone, and denied to the property in question.
5. That the requested variance will not be materially detrimental to the
public welfare or in,jurious to the property or imprnvements in such vicinity and zone
in which the property is located.
6. That no one indicated their presence at said public hearing in
opposition; and no correspon~lence was received in opposition to the subject peCition.
EUti'IRQ~IHEMTAL IMPACT RE~'~RT FIN6111~: That the Anaheim City Planning Commissinn does
her'eby recommend to the City Council of the City of Anaheim that the sub~::.t ~roje.ct
be exer~pt from the rPquirer^ent to prEp~re an environmental impact report, pursuant to
tfx: provisions of the California L•nvironmenta) Quaiity Act.
il(ri•1, TNF.RF.f~RF, BE IT RESOL.VCD that the Anshefm C;ty Planninn Comnission
does hereby grant suh,ject Petiti~n for Variance, upon the fo1'lowina conditions which
ar~~ hereby founcf to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposecl use of the subject
property in order to preservc: the safety and ~eneral welfare of the Citizens of the
City of Anaheim:
RESOLUTIOt~ N0. PL76-149
„ • ~ ~
r
1. That subject property shall be develaped substantially in accordance
with plans and specifications c+n file vlith the City of Anaheim markerl F.xhibit No. l.
2. That this variance shall he nranted for a time period to expire April
2.^., 1977, sub.ject to revie~~ and consideration for er.tensions of time, upon written
request by thr petitioncr; provicled, however, that saicl time extensions shall he
based upon the st~tus of tlie widenin~ of La Palma Avenue and Anaheim Boulevard, in
wliich event t~ie sub,ject nroperty may be re~uirad to 6e developed in conformance a~ith
the site development standards of the Cf, Zone ancl the size and shape of the property
may then not be suir.able for the proposed use.
TIIE f'ORGGOItlG RESOLUTIOfI is signed and approved by me this 2nd day of
August, 1976.
~.s.~O/~ ~.~
CHAIRt1AP1 PRO TEMPORE
At~AHF.IM CITY PLAMNINr, COH~iI5510M
ATTEST:
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLAMNIt1G CQIINISSIO~d
STAT[ OF CAL 1 FORt! I A )
COUNTY OF ORADIr,F )ss.
ClTY OF AHAHEIt1 )
I, Patricia B. Scanlan, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planni~g Commission,
do hereby certify that the fore~oing resolution was passed and adopted at a meetin~
of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, held on August 2, 1976, at 1:3~ P.m., by the
following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: C011M15510tIERS: BAR~JES, HERBST, KIiJG, MORLEY, TOLAR
NOES: COMI115SIONERS: FARAFIf1
ABSEtJT: COMHISSIOtJERS: JOIi1~SON
I~J WITNFSS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 2nd day of August,l??~.
~~.~.~,~,~.~~
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING CQMMISSIOP!
-Z- RESOLUTION N0. PC76~149