PC 76-15~ ~
RESOLUTION N0. PC76-15
A RESOLUTIO'~ OF THE CI7Y PLAt~~~ING CQ~TIISSIO~~ OF THE CITY OF AtJpHEIiI
TIIAT PETITION FOR COt~UITIONAL USE F:R(•1It t10. 159f BF GRAt~TED.
I~IIE(ZEAS, the City Planninq Commission of the City o` Anaheim did rPCeive a
verified Petition for Conditional Use Pernit from COt1ET, INC., P. 0. Box 6366,
Burbank. California 9151U (Owner);Id(t. !•IALLACE, 7?.9 U. Topeka, Anaheim, California
92~05 (Aaent) of certain real oro~erty situated in the City of Anaheim, County nfi
Oranqe, State of California, described as:
Lot 110. 15 of 7ract Ilc. 47~3. in the City af Anaheim, as shown in Book ~~
Pa9es i3 and 24, t•liscellaneous ifaps, records of Oran~e Co~anty.
tJfIEREAS, t;he ~ity Planning Commission did hold a public It~arinq at the City
Iiall in the City of Anahein on January 19. 197fi, at 1:30 ~.r~.. notice of said oublic
hearing having been duly given as required by 1aw and in accordance with the
provisions of the Anahein t4unic9pal Code, Cha~ter iR.~3, to hear and consider
evidence for and anainst said proposed conditiunal use and to investin~te and make
findings and recormendatinns in connection therewith; and
4111EREA5, said Commission, after due insnection, investigation and study made
by itself and in its behalf, and a~ter due consideration of all evidence anri renorts
offered at said hearing, does find and detrrnine the follnw'.ng facts:
1. Tl~at the proposed use is properly one for whicF~ a conditional use
transmissiontrepairs in thealL (INDUSTRIAL,6LIIITED),ZOtIE~ W~t~ °ermit automotive
2, Tha~ the petitioner indicated that the prooosed operation t~~?11 be
prinarily a wholesale business, thus 9enerating little or no customer traffic to the
site.
3. That the netitioner sti~ulated that al1 ~` thc proposed reoair work
e+ill be conducted inside the building.
4, 7hat the petitioner indicated that no structural alt,erations were
proposed to the buildin~.
5. That tlie proposed use is similar in nature to nreviously annroved
vehicular repair uses in the area; said uses havinn net been detrimental to the area.
6. That the proposed use~ as granted, wi11 not adversely affect the
adjoining land uses and the growth and develonment of the area in which it is
proposed to be located.
7. That the size and shape of the site nrnoosed for the use, as granterl,
is adequate to allo~a the full development of the use in a manner not detrinental to
the p~rticular area nor to the peac~, health~ safety~ and general vielfare of the
Citizens of the City of Anaheim.
C. That the granting of the Conditional Use permit under the conditions
imaosed wi11 not be detrimental to the peace, health, safety~ and neneral ~•relfare of
the Citizens of the City of Anaheim.
g, That no one indicated their presence at said public ii?aring in
opposition; and no correspondence was received in opposition to subject netition.
[P~VIRO~It1EN7AL I~IPACT REPORT FII~DIt~G:
That the Uirector of the Planning Uepartr~ent has determined that the
praposed activity falls within the deflntLion of Section 3.Q1~ C1ass 1, of the City
of Anaheim Guidelines to the Requir+~ments for an Environment~l Irripact Renort and is,
therefore, cate9arically exempt from the requirement to file an E]R.
t~GW, TfIEREFORE, 4£ IT RESOLVED that the Anahei~~ City Plannin9 Commissinn
does hereby grant sub~ect Petition for Conditional Use Permi;,, ;;non the follo~~iinn
conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary nrerequisite to the nronosed use
RESOLUTIOt~ t~0. PC76-15
~ ~
•~ nf the subject property in order tc pr~serve the safety and 9eneral welfare of the
Citizens of the C;ty of Analieim:
1. That subject nrooerty shall be devel~~ed substantially in accordance
with plans and specifications on file with the City of anaheim marked Exhibit tJo. 1.
2. That all of the proposed repair work sliall be conducted inside the
building, as stipulated to by the petitioner.
THE FOREGOIPIG RESU~UTIOW is s9gned and apnroved by me this 19th ciay c~f
January, 1976.
fi i'
H I ~ f~l, N HEIM CI PL NNING COMMISS Ofd
ATTEST:
Q~~~~~-~~~J
SF E , f~ IiE L(~I~ I1~ . ~1 SS~bN
STATE OF CALIFORfJIA )
COUP~TY OF ORANGE )ss.
CITY OF AtlAHEIti )
I, Patricia B. Scanlan, Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the
City of Anaheim, dc hereby certify tliat the foregoing resolutior was passed and
adopted at a meeting of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, held on
January 19, 197G, at 1:3^ ~.m., by the following vote of the members thereof:
NYES: COMDIISSIONERS: QARNES, H[RaST, JOHWSON, KING, ~40RLEY, TOLAR, FARAPIO
f~OES: COPIMISSIO~~ERS: N0~lE
ADSENT: C0~•it1ISSI0F~ERS: t10NE
It~ WITPIESS l•~IiEP,~JF, I have hereunto set my hand thi s 19th da,y of January,
1976.
~~~~~~~
, r fJ~~:b~tssi~
_2_ RESOLUTION P~O. PC76-15