PC 76-155~ ~
RESOL~ITION ~IO, PC76-155
A RESOLUTIO"! OF TH[ ANANEIM CITY PLl11Itlltl, CQMMISSI~H
THAT PFTITI~M fOR COhl~ITIOtlAL USE PF!;NIT P7o. 1~4h RE r,r,AtITED.
4JfiCRLAS, the Anaheim City Pianning Commission did receive a verlfied
Petition for Conditional lise Permit from ROBERT AtIQ lIELEt1 DULT7, 3Q26 W. P,all Roarl,
Anaheim, California 9280~~ (Qwners) of cer*.ain real property situated in the City of
/lnaheim, County of Orange, State of California described as:
That portion of the Plorth half of the Plortheast quarter of the tlortheast quarter
of the PJortheast quarter of Section 23, Tovmship 1E South, Range 11 4lest, in the
Rancho Los Coyotes, in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of
California, as per map recorded in book ,1, page 11 of Miscellancous Naps, in the
office of the county recor~les• of said county, sho~•m as Parcel 1 on a Parcel !~ap
filed in bool: 71, pages 23 and 24 of Parcel Maps in said county recorders office.
blIIEREAS, the City Plannin9 Commission did hold a puhlic hearing at the City
Hall in the City of Anaheim on August 16, 1976, at 1:30 p.m.y ~otice of said public
hearing having been duly given as required by lavr and in accordance with the
provisions of the Anaheim tlunicipal Code, Chapter 1A.03, to hear and cnnsider
evidence for and agatnst said proposed conditional use and to investigate and make
findings and recommendations in connection there~•rith; and
IJIfEREAS, said Commission, a`ter due inspection, investiqation and study made
by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports
offered at said hearing, does find and determine the following facts:
t. That the proposed use is properly one for which a conditional use
permit is authorized by Code Sectinn 1°,1111.QSD.~50, to wit: permit a veterinary
hospital in the CL (COMIIERCI~L, L1~11TED) ZONE.
2. That the petitioner stipulated to constructing a 6-foot hiah masonry
wall along the v~est property line, or to post a bond in an amount and form
satistactory to the City Attorney's Office for the construction of said :~all; and in
the eveiit that the petitioner elects to post a bond in lieu of constructing the wall
prior to final building and zoning tnspections, tlis bond shall become due and Lhe
wajl constructed within one year of the date of this resolution, unless an extension
of time is granted by the Planning Commission.
3. That the proposed use will not adversely affect the ad_joining land uses
and the groo~th and development of the area in which it is proposed to be lncated.
4. That the size and shape of the site proposed for the use is adequate to
allo~+ the full development of the proposed use in a manner not detrimental to c_'ne
particular area nor to the peace, health, safety, and generai welfare of the Citizens
of the City of Anaheim.
5. 7hat the 9ranting of the Conditional Use Permit under the conditions
~mposed, if any, will not be detrimental to the peace, health, safety and general
welfare of the Citize~s of the City of Anaheim.
G. That no one tndicated their ~resence at said public hearing in
opposition; and that no correspondence was received tn oppositian to suhJect
petition.
EPIVIRONNENTAL I!1PACT REPORT FIFIDINCs That the Director of the Planning
Department as etermined *_hat t e propose activity falis a~ithin the definition of
Section 3.fl1, Class 1, of the City of Anaheim fuidelines to the Requirements for an
Envir~nmental Impact Report and ls, therefore, categorically exempt from the
requirement to file an EIR.
t~Ol•J, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Pla.nning Commission
does hereby 9rant subject Petition for Conditional Use Permit, upon the followfng
conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequlsite to the pruposed use
of the subject property in order to preserve the safety and general weifare ~f the
Citizens of the City of Anaheim:
t. That trash storage~areas shall be provided in accordance with approved
plans on file with the office of the Director of ?ublic Works.
RESOLUTION PlO. PC76-155
• ~ ~
?.. That a six-foot (G ft.) hi91i masonrv wall shall he constructerl alonq
the ~•~r_st property line or, in lieu thereof, a hond shall he posted to qi~arantee the
construction of said wall within one (1) year of the date of this resolution, as
stipulated to by the petitioner.
3. That suhJect property shall be devel~ped substantially tn eccordance
with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked Exhihit tlos. 1
and 2.
4. That Condition Nos. 1, 2, and 3, ahove-mentioned, shall he complied
~aith prior to final building and ~oning inspections.
THE FOR'r.G01 t•I~ RESOLUT I OPI i s s i gned
August, 1g7G.
ATTEST:
.~~.c~.J,~~~~-~a-~J
SECRETARY, ANAHEIt4 CITY PLAWtd11Jf, COMMISSIn~~
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUtlTY OF ORAtJr,E )ss.
CITY OF /1NAHEIN )
1, Patricia B, Scanlan, Secretary of the Anahetm City Planning Commission,
do hereby certify that the foregoing rasolution a~as passed ar.d adopted et a meeting
of thc Anaheim City Planning Commisslon, lield on August 1(~, 1976, at 1:3~ p.m., by
the following vote of thc members thereof:
AYES: COHHIS510WERS: BARPIES, FAR~!IQ, HERBST, KI~IG, 110RLEY, TOL/1R~ JOHNSON
tJ0E5: COHI~11 SS I QPIERS: NOIVE
ABSEIJT: COMHISSIONERS: PIOtlE
IP1 WITt~ESS IJhIEREOF, I have hereu~to set my hand this 16th day of August t°7F.
~~~ . ~~~
SECRFTARY, AilAliE I M C I1'Y PLANPI I NG CQHt4 I SS I 9N
-2- RESOLUTION N0, PC76-155