PC 76-255~ ~
RESOLUTIOfJ PIO. PC76-255
A RESOLUTI01~ OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PIANNING COMMISSION
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUIlCIL OF TIIE CITY OF ANAHEIM
TI~AT PETITIOPI POR RECLASSIFICATION ~10. 76-77-2 BE APPROVED
WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission did receive a verified
Peti~tio~ for Reclassificatian from tne ESTATE UF ADOLPH J. SCtfUTTE, c/n Alan Talt,
615 South Flower, //806, Los Angeles, California ~0017 and ZETA VANCE EATQN AND
EL12A4ET!1 JEAtJ CONLIPI, BE.P. 99~, PapeeCe, Tahiti (Owners); R06ERT F. WARMItlGTON
COMPAt•IY, 'i7II80 Skypark.Circle, 1/205, Irvine, California 9z714 (Agent) of certain real
property situated in the City of Anahcim, County of Oran9e, State of California,
described as:
That portion of Lot 10 of the I'letcher Tract, in the County
of Arango, 3tato of Californiu, as per map rocorded in bool:
3, pags 32~ of Pliscsllaneouy Records, in tho offico of the
County Raco~^dnr of I,os 1~r-gelna County, California, lying
Westmrly of tha,following doncribod line:
Bmginning at n point in the centor line ot Taf.t Avenue,
40.00 feet wide, distcxnt alon7 ~aid centar line, S. 89° 32'
37" F:.~ 17$.19 feat from tha intersection of sai3 cantar
lino with the canter line o£ {4aasar Road, 40.00 font wido,
~a said center lines nre cloacribod in deed recorcled in baok
852, pago 82 of Ufficial P.ecords in tho affico of the Count•y
Rncorder of said County and shown on map attached tliereto,
aaid cantc~r line of Taft Avouue also being tha Southorly
lino a~ said Lot 10, aaid point of beginning also being the
So~.~th~+~~eterly cornor of tho lanei describe3 in Parcel 3A of
Final Ordar of Condrm.hation~ in Superior Court of tkio State
of Cslifornia, Casc~ No. 14565A, a cortified copy of wliich
wae racorded March 23, 19G7 in book 820C>, ~Sage 607, Offir_i»1
Itecords; ttionco alony tlie j~eaterly boundary of said Parcal
3A, N. 17• 00' S8" E., 109.91 faet to a tang~nt curve
con~ave i•7eaterly havinq a radiua of 550.00 foet; thenca
IJortherl.y along saicl curve through an anglQ o£ 52° 49' S8",
an arc distt~nce of 507.1G feet to the genoral weaterly .
boundary line of eaid Rancho Santiago de Santa ]1.na.
EXCEPTING TFIF;IiLFROb1 the following deecribed parcel of land:
13~ginnin~ ~t the intaraection of thQ aenter 3.ines of wasaer
Itoad an3 Taft Avenue as eaid c~nter lines are describecl in
deQd recorded in b~ok 852, page II2 of Of£~cial Recards in
tlio ofPice of tkxo County P.ecorder of ~aid County; thence:
ulong the Sauthorly linc of land clescriL~od in ciaed to Lawronc¢
W. ~aton and othors rscorded in bool: 81, pa4a 497 0£ eaid
Official ltucorc'!s, tJ. 89° 32' 20" W., 20.80 fQet to tho
S•7aoterly line of said k'ascnr Roud; thence along suid Weaterly
line, N, 16° 23' 44" E., 20.50 fuet to a tangent curvc
concavo Southorly having a radius of 44.00 feet; thonce
al.ong e~ici last-mentioned ciirve ~aaterly through an an91e of
17]• 56' S6" ~n arc distance of 133.6:, faet to a81cZ a~-~t~:r
iine of TnL'z F.v~i~uni tiionco along said centar lino of TaEt
Avonue, ta. 89° 32' 37" W., 70.47 feot to the point of bec~inning.
EXCEPT THERF.PROM thut purtion included in sald Wasser Rca3
and Taft Avonue.
WIiEREAS, the City Planning Commission did schedule a public hea~tng at the
City Hall in the City of Anaheim on November 22, t976, at 1:30 p.m., notice of said
public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the
provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.03, to hear and consider
evidence for and against said proposed reclassification and to investigate and make
findings and recommendations in connection therewith; said public hearing having been
continued to the Planning Commission meeting of December 6, 1976; and
RESOLUTION t10. PC76-255
~ . ~
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection~ investigaCion and study made
by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports
offered at said hearing, does find and determine the following facts:
1. That the petitioner proposes a reclassification of zoning on the above-
described property from the RS-i;-43,000 (RESIDEtITIALJAGRIGULTURAL) ZONE to the RS-
5000 (RESiDENTIAL, SINGLE-fAMILY) ZONE.
2, That the Anaheim General Plan, as amended,.designates the subject
property for low-medium density residential tanc~ uses.
3, That tf~e proposed reclassification of subJect property is necessary
and/or desirable for the orderiy and proper develo~ment of the community.
1t. That the proposed reclassificarion of s~bject property does proper'Jy
n~.late to the zones and their permitted uses locally established in close proximity
to subJect property and to the zones and thcir permitted uses generally established
L•hrou9hout the community.
5. That no one indicated their presence at said public hearing in
opposit3on; and that no corrospondence was received in, opposition to subject
petition.
EilVIP,OMt1E17TAL 111PACT REf'ORT FIh~DING: That Environmental Im~act Report~No.
178, having been considered this date by the Anaheim City Planning C~mmission and
evidence, botfi written and oral, h.eving been presented to supplement said draft EIR
No. 178, the Planning Commission believes tliat said draft EIR No. 178 does conform to
the City and State Guidelines and the State of California Environmc•ntal Quality Act
and, based upon such information, does hereby recommend to the City Council that they
certify saicl EIR No. 178 is in compliance with said Environmental Quality Act;
provided, however, Chat the Planning Commission does further recortmend that sa(d EIR
include some consideration.for recreational sNace in the proJect, i.e., access to the
riding and hiking trails in the area or park spece, etc., sald recommendation beiny
made on the Uasis that the subject property was previously indicated as an industrial
area on the Ceneral Plan and, through the rezoning of this pro~erty, parks and
recreational far.ilities are not necessari~y available in the vicinity for use by the,
residents in the proposed single-family residential pro)ect.
~ ~~OW, TI~EREFORE, BE IT RESOLVEp that the Anaheim City Planning Commission
does hereby recommend to '.I~e City Council of the City of Anaheim that subject
Petition for Reclassification be approved and, by so doing, that Title 18-Zoning of
the Anaheim Plunicipal Code be amended to exclude the above-described property from
the RS-A-43,Q00 (RESIDEP!'fIAL/AGRICULTURAL) ZONE and to incorporate said e~escribed
property into the RS-5000 (RESIDEPlTIAL, SINGLE-FAMILY) ZONE upon the foliowing
conditions ~rhich are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use
of subJect property in order to preserve the safety and general welfare of the
Citizens of the City of Anaheim:
1. That a final tract map of subJect property shall be submitted to and
approved by 4he City Council and then be recorded in the Office of ttie Orange County
Recorder.
2. That these . reclassification proceedings are granted subJect to
completion of annexation of,subject property to the City of Anaheim.
3, That the property owner(s) shall grant a minimum 30-foot wide ingress
and egress easement.to the southeast portion of the parcel at the southeast corner of
Ball Road and Sunkist Street, and safd easement shall be reviewed and approved by the
City Attorney and then be recorded in the Office ef the Orange County Recorder
concurrently with final tract map recordation.
4. That development of subject property shall be in accordance with
Council Policy No. 542 pertaining to sound attenuation for residential developments.
5, Prior to the introduction of an ordinance rezoning subject property,
Condition Nos. 1 and 2, above-mentioned, shall be completed. The provisions or
rights granted by this resolution shall become null and void by action of the City
Council unless afd conditions are complied with within one year from the date hereof,
or sucli further time as the City Counctl may grant.
6. That Cond:ition No. 4, above-mentioned, shall be complied wi~th prior to
fina) building and zoning inspections.
_Z_ RESOLUTION N0. PC76-255
. ., . ~ ~
THE FOFEGOING RESOLUTION is signed
December, 1976.
or~
ATTEST:
~Q. ~I~~ ~- ~ - ' r ' ~~i ~ ~ . J
SECRETARY, ANAIIEIM CITY PLAI•lNIPIG COt1MISSi0t1
STATE OF CALIFORNI.4 )
COUIITY OF ORANGE )ss.
CITY Of AtVAHEIM )
I, Patricia B. Scanlan, Secretary of the~Anaheim City Planning'Commission,
do hereby certify thet the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting
of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, held on December 6, 1976, at 1:30 F•m•, by
the following vote of the members thereof:
AYFS: COMtNiSSIOPIERS: BAR~IES, fARANO, KING, MORLEY, TOLAR, JOHIJSON
NOES: COM;IISSIONERS: NONE
ABSEPIT: COP'IMISSiOWERS: H[RDST
1976.
IPJ 411TPIESS WHEREOF, I have hereunYO set my hand this 6th day of December,
~~~~G%a~a~
SECRETARYy ANAIiE111 CITY PLAIJIdItJG COMMISSION
_3_ RESOLUTION ~~0. Pc76-255