PC 76-256~ ~
RESOLUTION N0. PC76-256
A RESOLUTION OF TNE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COM1115510N
REC011MENDiNG TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AWAH[IM
THAT PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION N0. 76-77-29 BE APPROVED
WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission did initiat.^. a verified
Petitlon for Reclassification of certain real property situated in the City of
Anaheim, County of Urange, State of California, descri.bed as follows: ~
That portion of:the Northwest quarter of the Northeast quarter oi
Section 24, Township 4 South, Range 10 West, in the Rancho San Juan
Cajon de SanL•a 11na, as per map recorded in IIook 51., pagc 10,
hliscellaneous Maps, records of Orange County, described as follows:
eeginninh at the northwest corner of said Northwest quarter, said
corner being the point of i.ntersection of the centerline of Ball Road
wit•h the center.line of Sunkist St.reet, as shown on a ma~r f:iled in Aook
83, page 31, Record of Surveys, in the office of the County Recorder
of said Orange County; t}ience S 1° 09'.'L1" W along the wes~erly line
oC said Pi~rthwest yarter being coincident witl~ said cen~erline oL
Sunkist StreeL•, a disL•ance of 95.00 feet- to.the true poinL- oE beyinning;
thence S 89° 55' 39" E, 57.00 feel•; thence N 99° 04: 05" E, 54.94 fecl-
to a poinL• in a line that is parallel with and dist-ant southerly 55.00
feel•, measured at riyht angles from the nor.l•herly line of said Northwest
quarter, sa.id norl•herly line beiny coincident with said center.line of
13a11 Road; L•hence S II9° 02' 32" G paral.l.el orit•!i said cenL-e~line ~if
Ball Itoad, 65.00 feet•; L•I~ence S 79° 57' 09" I:, 32.77 Ee~>.t• L-o a point
in a iine that is par.a].1e1 with and distant• easter.ly 191.II3 feeL•,
measured along said cenl-erline of Bal.l. Road, from said centerline of
SunkisL- Street; L•hence S 1° 04' 21" TV paral.lel with s~id Sunkist Street
142.65 fec:t to a point in'a line that is parallel wiL-h and distanL-
soul•herly 202.83 teet, meausred alony said centerl.ine af Sunkist Str.eet,
from said centerline of IIall Road; thence N 89° 02' 32" W parallel. with
said centerline oP Bali. !'oad, ~ distance of 191.83 feet t-o a poin~ in
said centerline of Sunkist Strc_~at; thence N 1° 04' 21" G alor~~g said
centerline ot Sunlcist Street 1Gi.A3 feet t•o l•he true poi.nt- of Ueqinning.
~xcept• thcre[rom any portion thereof ].ying within Sunkist Street.
WH[REAS, the City Planning Cortimission did hold a puhlic hearing at the Clty
{lall in the CiCy of Anaheim on December 6, 1976, at 1:30 p.m., notice of said pubitc
hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance wlth the
provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18,0},. to hear and consider
evtdence for and against said proposed reciassification and to investigate and make
findings and recommendations in connection therewith.; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made
by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports
offered at satd hearing, does find and determine the follawing facts:
1, That ttie Anaheim City Plannin9 Commission proposes a reclassificatlon
of zoning on the above-described property from the Ca!~nty of Orange A1 District to
the City of Anaheim RS-SOOQ (Residential, Sfngle-Family) ~ane.
2. That the Anahelm General Plan, as amended, desi,nates the subjc:c't
property for low-medium density residential uses.
3, That the authorized agent for the owner of subject prot~erty was Fresent
at said public hearing and indicated no objections to the proposal for rezoning.
4, That the subJect property consists of a small corner parcel which has
restrlcted access to adjacent arterial hi9hways and is contiyuous to a larger parcel
to the east and souCh upon which a sing!e-family development has been approved; and,
therefore, the subject property should appropriately be developed with single-family
residences. • '
RESOLUTI01! N0. PC76-256
~ ~
5. That the proposezi reclassification of subiect pro;r•ar~y is necessary
and/or desirable for the orderly and proper development ~f the community.
6. That the proposed reclassification of subject property does properly
relate to the zones and their permitted uses lecally established in close proximity
to subject property and to the zones and their permitted uses generally establ(shed
throughout t~ie community. •
7. That the proposed reclassificafion of subject property requires the
dedicatio~ and improvement oT abutting streets in accordance with the Circulation
Element of the General Plan, due to the anticipated increase in traffic which will be
generated by the intensification of land use.
8. ThaC no one indicated their presence at said publtc heartng in
opposition; and that no correspondence was received in opposition to subJect
petition. .
ENVIRONI1EIJTAL IMPACT REPORT FINDiNG: That the Anaheim Gity .Planning
Commission does hereby recomnend to the City Council of the City of Anaheim that a
negative declaration from the requirements to prepare an environmental impact report
be approved for the su6ject proJect, pursuant to the provisions of the Galifornia
Environmentai Quality Act.
NOW, Tf1EREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Conunission
does hereby recommend t~o the City Council of the, City of Anaheim that subject
Petltlon for Reclassification be approved and, by so doing, that Title 18-Zontng of
the Anaheim Municipal Code be amended to exclude the above-described property from
the CQUI~TY OF ORANG[ A1 DISTRICT and to incorporate said described proper.ty into the
CITY Of ANAII[It4 RS-5000 (RESIDENTIAL, SIPlGLE-FAM~LY) ZONE upon the fc:lowing
conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the prop~sed use
of subject property in order to preserve the safety and general welfare of the
CiCizens of the City of Anaheim:
1, That the owner(s) of subject property sh.~Sl deed to the City of Anaheim
a strip of land 45 feet in width from the centerline of the street along Sunk(st
Street and 53 feet in width from the centerline of thc s:reet along Ball.Road for
street widenin~ purposes. ~
2 That all engineering reguirements of the Cit,y of Nnaheim along Ball
Road and Sunkist Street including preparation of improvement plans and installation
of all improvements such as curbs and gutters, sidewalks, street grading and paving,
drainage facilitles or other appurtenant work, shall be complied with as required by
the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in
the Office of the City Engineer; that street llghting facilities along Ball Road and
Sunkist Street shall be installed as required by the Dtrector of Public uCi7~eies,
and in accordance a~ith standard specifications on file in the Office oF the Director
of Public Utilfties; or that a bond, certificate of deposit, letter of credit, or
cash, in an amount and form satisfactory to the Cit; of Anaheim shall 6e posted with
the City to guarantee the installation of the abov~:-mentioned requirements.
3, That the owner(s), of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim
the sum of sixty cents (60C) per front foot alony Ball Road and Sunkist Street 4ur
tree planting purposes.
4. That subject property shall be served by underground utilities.
5, That dratnage of subject property shall be disposed of in a manner
satisfactory to the City Engineer.
6. That the a+ner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anahelm the
appr~priate park and recreation in-lteu fees as determined to be approprtate by the
City Council, satd fees to be paid at the time the building permit is issued.
7, That these reclassification proceedings are granted subject to
completion of annexation of subject property to the City of Anaheim.
8. That development of subject property shall be in accordance with
Council Policy tVo. 547. pertaining to sound•attenuation for residential uses.
-2- RESOLUTION N0. PC76-256
~ ~
. 9. In the event subject properl:y is to be divided for the purpose of sale.
lease, or financing, a parcel map, to r•ecord the approved division of, subJect
property, be submitted to and anproved by the City of Anaheim and =hen be recorded in
the Office of the Orange County Recorder.
10. Prlor to the introduction of an ordinance re~ontng subject property,
Condition No. 7, above-mentioned, shall be completed. The .provisions or rights
granted by this resolution shalt become null and void by action of ttie City Council
unless said conditions are complied with within one year from the date hereaf, or
such further time as the City Council may grant. •
11. ThaE Condition Nos. 1, 2, and 3., above-mentionad, shall be complied
with prlor to the issuance of building permits.
12• That Condttton Nos. 1F, 5 and 8, above-mentioned, shai! be corimplied wlth
prlor to final building and zoning inspections. • •
December,
ATTEST:
~!~~OtJ~~~~.r~~~.!
SECRI:TARY, At~At1EIM CITY PLAIJIVING COMMISS10~7
STATIE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUI~TY OF ORAtIGE )ss.
CITY OF AN~HEIM )
I, Patricia D. Scanlan, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning :ommission,
do hereby ce:'tify that the foreyoing resolution was passed and adoptsd at a meeting
oi the Anahelm City Planning Commission, held on December 6, 1^76, at 1:30 p.ir,;, by
the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COt1t41S51oPIERS: BARNES, FARA~~O, KIPJG, MORLEY, TOLAR, JOHNS011
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE •
A4SENT: CQMMISSIONERS: HERBST
1976.
TNE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved me this 6t day of
1976.
CHAIRMAP! ANAFIEI ITY PLANtJING COMMISSION
IN WITNESS WIiEREOF, I have here~!nto set my hand this 6th day of December~
~Q~`.~l1~~/ f~r~GZ.~..e~Lsc.%
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLAtlNING COMMlSSION,
-3- RESOLUTI01~ N0. PC76-z56