PC 76-264~ ~
RESOLUTION N0. PC76-264
A RESGLUTtON OF THE ANAHEIH CITY PLAN~IIN~ COMHISSI0~1
THAT PETITION FOR CONDITIOI~AL USE PERNIT N0. 1673 BE GRANTED.
4JHEREAS~ the Anaheim City Plannir9 Comntssion did receivc a ver•ified
Petitton for Conditional Use Permit frcxn WALT DISGEY PRODUCTIOFIS. 500 5. Buena Vlsta
5treet, Burbank, California 91505 (Owner); WRATHER HOTELS~ INC., 270 N, Canon Drive,
Beverly Hilis, California 90210 (Agent) of certatn real property situated in the City
of Anaheim~ County of Orange~ State of California~ described ~s:
Lot 3 in ~91ock 14 of Fairvlew Colnny Tract, as shown on a Map recorded in RooF: 1~
page 33 of Miscellaneous Maps~ recurds of Orange County, California„ EXf,EPTI~I~
from said L~~t 3. the following:
Corrcnencing at the point of intersect?on of the center line of the F~Q-foot road as
shown on said map, adjoining Blocks 14 and 15 of sald Fairview Colony TracC on
the East. with the Easterly extension of the iine common tn said Biocl:s and 1~F
and 15; thence 5outh II9 degrees 45' 2E" West along said extended line and alcng
the line common to said Blocl;s 14 and 15, 620.2Q feet to :he true point of
be~inning of this description, said point being hereby designated as Point A;
thence from said true point of begtnning North 0 degrees, 45' 2R ~' West, 1~b.5h
feet; thence South 0 degrees, 05' 20" East 26.5Q feet to the line common to said
blocks 14 and 15; Chence North 84 deyrees 45' 2A" Easc alonv s~id line 104.54
feet to the true point of beginning.
WHEREAS, the City Pla~ni~~g ~~xnmission did hold a public hcaring at the City
Hall in the City of Anaheim on Decerr"•~°r 20, i:~;C; at 1:30 p.m., notice ~f said public
hearing having been duly given as required by i~:•! and in accordance with the
pravisions of ttie Anaheim M~!;~ic7pal Code. Chapter 18.03, to hear and consider
evidence for and against said preposed conditional use and tc+ tnvestigate and mabe
findings and recommendations in connectian Ct~erewith; ~nd
llHEREAS, said CortimTssion~ after due inspection, investigation an<1 study made
by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all ev.idence and reports
offered at said hearing, does find and determine the following facts:
1. That the proposed use is properly one for which a condittonal use
p~rmit ts authorized by Code Section 1$.4i;.050.07Q, to ~oit: pcrmit a 13~story hotel
tower in the commercial-recreatlon area.
2. That the praposed use will not advcrsely affect tf~e ad)oining land uses
and the growth and development of the area tn which it is proposed to be located.
3. That the size and shape of the site proposed for the use is adequate to
allow the full development of the proposed usc irt a manner not detrimental to the
particular area nor to the peace, health, safety, and general welfare of the Cittzens
of thc City of Anahcim.
4. That the granting of the Conditional llse Permii under the condittons
imposed will not be detrlinental to the peace, health, safety and qeneral welfarc of
the Citizens of the City of Anahcim.
5. That the petittonei' stipulated to rehutldtnq the exisiing traf`ic
signals at the (ntcrsectlon of Cerritos Avenue and West Street and along 1~!est Street
at the hotel entrance, at the petitioner's expense.
6. 7hat the petitioner stiputated to ~o^d~!eting additional study
consisting of flying a balloon at Yfie max~mum build!ng hetgi~t to assure that no
portion of the proposed 15Z-foot htgl~ haLel tuwer witl bc visible from withln
Disneyland Park, in compilance with the he~ight standard guldeiines of the Anafieim
Lommerctal-Reereational Area as defined irt Map Na 1124.
7. That no one indicated their presence at said public heari~g in
opposition; and that no correspondence was received in opposition to subJect
petitiol.
ENVlRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FINDING: That Environmental Impact Repnrt No.
192, t!aving beeri considered this date by the Anaheim City Planning Commisslon and
evidence, both written and oral, having be~n ~resented to supplement sald draft EIR
No. 192~ the Planning Commisslon believes that said draft EIR No. iQ2 does conform to
thc City and State Guideilnes and the State of California Environmental Quality Act
RESOLUTION N0. ?C76-'264
~ ~
and~ based upon such information, does hereby recommend to the City Council of the
City of Anahetm that they certify said EIR No. 192 is in compliance with saici
Environmental Quality Act.
~JOW, T1IEREFGRE, BE IT RESOLVED that r.he Anahcim City Planning Commission
does hereby grant subJect Petition for Conditional Usc Permit, upon the followinc~
conditions which are hereby found Co he a necessary ~rerequisite to tfie proposed use
of the subJect property in order to preserve the safety and generai welfare of the
Citizens of the City of~Anahsim:
1. That 2he petitioner stipulated to conductir.g addttional study
consisting of flying a balloon at the rnaximum build~ng height to assure that no
portion of the proposed tower will b~ visible from ~aithin Disneylard Pa~k, ~•~ith
results of said sCudy to be submitted to the Planning Department for revie~a, as
stipulated to by the petitioner.
2. That trash storaae area~ ;hall be provided in accordance with approved
plans on file with the Office of the Direc:or of Public Works.
3. That fire hydrants shall be installed and charged as required and
determined to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire De.partment prior to commencement
of structurai framing.
4. Tha2 this Conditional lise Permit is granted subJect to the completion
of Reclas~ification No. 66-67-61, now pending.
5. That the existing traffic signals at the intersectfon of Cerritos
Avenue and West Street and along lJest StreeC at the hotel entrance tse rebuilt to
Engineering standards and speclficatians as approved by the Traffic Engineer, the
cost of said signals is to be borne entirely by the petitioner, as stipulated to by
Che petitioner.
6. That subject property shall be developed substantiaily in accordance
with plans and specif(car.ions un file with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit Nos. i
through 13.
7. That Condition PJos. 1 and 4, above-nentioned, shall be complied with
prior to the commencement of the activity authorized under this resoluticn, or priar
to the time that the building permit is issued, or witnin a period of one year from
date hereef, whichever occurs first, or such further time as tne Pianning Commissi~n
and/or C'.ty Council may grant.
8. That Condition Nos. 2, 5 and 6, above-mentioned, shall be complied with
prior to fi~al b~?lding and zoning inspections.
THE FOREGOINf RESOLUTIOIJ is signed
Deceinber, 19j6.
ATTEST:
0~~~~~~~
SECRETARY, ANAIIEIM CITY PLAPINING COMNISSIOt~
and approve me this 20th day of
/
~r~~~,y`~
CH/11Rf1A I ANAHEIt TY °LANNING CO"!MISSInt!
-2- RESQLUTION N0, PC76-2i~'~
• .' ~ ~
STATF OF CALIFORNIA )
COJtITY OF QRANGE )ss.
CITY Of ANAHEIM )
I, Patricia B. Scanlan, Secretary of Che Anaheim City Planning Commission,
do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was ~assed and adapted at a meeting
of thP Anaheim City Plar.ning Commission, held on Decemher 20, 1976, at 1:3~ p.m., hy
the folloo-iing vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BARP~'cS, FARAPIO, HERBST, KthG, MORLEY, TOLAR, JOHNSON
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: C0~4MISSIONERS: NOPIE
Ip WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 20th day of December
t976.
(~~Z~/LGC~~Q~ 7~CAL~C.~.~
SECRETARY, APIAHE I P1 C I TY PLANP! 1 FIG CnMN I SS I OD!
-3- RESOLUTION N0. PC76-264