PC 76-28~ ~ ~
,
RESOLUTION N0. PC76-28
A RESOLUTiOP~ OF THE CIT`( PLAPIWING C0~1MISSIOPI OF TNE CITY OF AtJAHEI'1
RECOtiP1ENDItd6 TO THE ~TTY COUidCIL OF THE CJ.iY OF /;tdANEItt 71IAT
PETZTION FOR RECLASSIFICATIO(V N0. 75-76-23 BE APRI20VED.
WHERFAS, the City Planning Com~~ission of the City of Anaheim did receive a
verified ?etitior~ for Re.classificatio7 from LLQYD PIEST, 934? Gilbert Street,
Anaheim, C3lifornia 92IIp1 (Owner); K. P. JOIiI1SOPl, 1695 W. Crescent Avenue, Anaheim,
California 428U]. (A~ent) i~f certain real property situated in the City nf Anaheim,
County of Orange, State o~` California, described as:
The South 19?.75 feet of the West 2R3.59 i'eet of that nortior of the 41est half of
the Southwest quarter of the Northeast qua.rter of Saction 7, Township h South,
Range 10 LJest, in the Rancho Los Coyotes, as sfiown nn a map thereof recorded in
book 51, page 10, F1iscellaneous t•1aps, records of said Oran9e County, lyin~ tJorth
of the South 9 acres uf said ~lest half.
4lf~EREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearin~ at the City
Ilall in the City of Ar.aheim on February 18, 1975, at 1:30 n.m., notice of said nublic
he~r:~ig having been duly given as required by law and in accordance ~aith the
provisions of the Anaheim ldunicipal Code, Chapter 18.03, to hear and consider
evidence for and against said proposed reclassification and to investigate and make
findings and recomm~ndations in corrnection ±herewi~h; and
WIIEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study ~?ade
by i+..self and in its behalf, and after due consideratian of all e~idence and renorts
offered at said hearing, does find and determine the fo'Iln!,~ing facts:
1. That the petitioner proposes a reclassification of the above-descr~ibed
(RESIOE ITLAL,m~4ULTIPLESFAh1ILY)~ZQ~~ERESIDEfJTIAL/AGRICULTURAL) ZOPlE to the R;?-1?')0
2. That the Anaheim General Plan designates subject ~ropertY for medium-
density residential uses.
3. That the proposed reclassification of sub,~ect property is necessary
and/or desirable for tlie ord~rly and proper development of the community.
4. That the proposeci reclassification of subject property does nr~,perly
relate to the zones and their ~ermitted uses locall,y established in close proximity
to subject property and to the zones and the9r nerrritted uses nenerallY established
tliroughout tlie communi+y.
5. That the proposed reclassification of subject pronerty requires the
~edica:ion and improvement of abutt9ng streets in accordance with the Circulation
Element of tlie 6eneral Plan, due to the anticipated increase in traffic ~•~hict~, will be
aenerated by the intensification of land use.
6. That no one indicated the9r presence at said oublic liearing in
opposition; and no correspondence was received in eppos9tion to subject netition.
Ef~VIROta~•1ENTAL Ih1PACT REPORT FINDI~~G:
That the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby recommer~d to the Gity
Council that the subject project be exempt ;'rom the requirement to prepare an
environmental impact report, pi:rsuant ~o thc? provisions of the Cr~lifornia
Environmental Quality Act.
NOW, THERE"rORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim Cit,y Planning Commission
does hereby recommend to the City Counci; of the City of Anaheir~ th~t subject
Petition for Reclassification be approved and, by so do-ing, that Title 1R-Zoning of
the Anaheim ~lunicipal Code be amended to excludE the above-described ~ro~~~erty t'rom
the RS~A-43,000 (RESID[PI1'~AL/AGRICULTURAL) ZONE and to incorporate s~id described
property into ttie Rt~i-1200 (RESIDENTIAL, MULTIPLE-FHt4ILY) ZONE unon the fr,lloe~in~
conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary prerenuisite to thP nronosed usa
of su~ject property in o!^der to nreserve the safety and general welfare of the
Citizens of the City of Anaheim:
RESOLUTiON h0. PC75-~`~
' ~ ~
1. That sidewalks shal~ be installed along Gilbert Street and Greenacre
Avenue as required by the City Engineer and in a.ccordance with standard plans and
specifications on file in the Office of the City Engineer.
2. That street lighting facilities along Gilbert Street anci Greenacre
Av~nue shall be installed as required by the Uirector of Public Utilities and in
accordanc~ vtith standard plans and specifications on file in the Cffice of the
Director of Public Utilities and that a bond in an amount and form satisfactory to
the City of Anaheim shall be ~osted with the Ci~cy to 9uarantee the instaliation of
tiie above mentioned requirements.
3. That the owner(s) of subject nroperty shall pay to the City of Anahcim
ti~e sum of 60 cents per f;-ont foot along Gilbert Street and Greenticre Avenue for tree
planting purposes,
4. That trash storage areas sha11 be nrovided in accordance ~rith a~prov~d
plans on file with the Office of tha Uirector of Publir, tdorks.
5. That fire hydrants shall be inatalled and char~ed as required and
determined i:o be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Departme~it prior to comme.ncementi
of structural framing.
6. That subject property shall b~ served by under9round utilities.
7. That drainage ~~f sub~ect property shall be disposed of in a manner
saLisfactory to the City Engineer.
5. That the owner(s! of subject proper~ry shall pay to the City of Anahei~
t:ie appropriate park and recreation in-lieu fees as determined to be an~ronriate by
the City Council, said fees to be paid at the time *he building permit is issued.
9. That appropriate ~aater assessment fees as determined by the Director of
Public Utilities shall be pa9d to the City of Anaheim prior to the issuance of a
building permit.
10. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance
witli plans and spacifications on file 41ith the City ofi Anaheim marked Exhibit Plo. :.
il. Pr~or to the introduction of a~ ordinance rezoning subject pronerty,
Condition Nos. 2 and 3, above-mentioned, shal? be completed. The orovisions or
rights granted by this resolution shall becume null and vnid by action of the City
Council unless said conditions are cornt,lied Hrith within one year from the date
hereof, or such further time as the City Council may grant.
12. That Condition tJos. 1, 4, 6, 7, and 10, aoove-mentioned, shall be
complied with prior to r'inal building and zonfng ~nspections.
T11E FOREGOItlG RESOLUTIOiJ is siqned and aopr~ved by me this 1'~th day of
February, 15i6.
~~ ~ ~~~
'I~~Ct~, N HE t• ~ L td JIPI~ t1'~ SS ~!
ATTEST:
~ ~~2`uc,u~~ C:~2.cc~/
E E , d N~ NtJ J S~ST~N
_2_ RESOLUTIO^! td0. PC76-2£1
~ ~ ~
STATE OF CALIFORPlIA
COUWTY OF ORAI~GE ss.
CITY OF ANAHEI^1
I, Patricia B. Scanlan, Ser,retary of the Cit.y P]anning Commission of the
City of Anaheim, do hereby certify tha"_ the foregoing resolution was passed and
adopted at a meeting of the City Planning Commiss~on of ~;he City of Anaheim, held on
February 18, 1976, at 1:30 p.m., by the following vote of the members thereof:.
AYES: COt1MISSIONERS: DARNE,S, HERBST, JOHPlSON, KItaG, MORLEY, TOLAR, fARANO
faOES: COMMISSIONERS: IVOWE
ABSEFIT: COMf4ISSTONERS: NO"~E
1976
IF~ l~JITNESS IJIiEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand thi s 13th day of FebruarY,
Ui "~~~,~ ~.~~J
C E R, d H , f~N I~~ !•14 ;i
-3- RESOI.UTION P~O. ,^C76-2~3