PC 76-38., ~ ~
RESO:.UTIOtJ N0. PC76-36
A RESOLUTYDN OF THE CITY PLAP~NING C014'tIS5I0N OF THE ~ITY 0~' AtIAHEIPI
REC.OFiMENQIP~G TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE ~ITY OF At~AHEIM THAT
PETITIOP~ FOR RECLASSIFICATIOy N0. 75-7u-25 BE APPROVE~.
WHEREAS, the Citiy Planning Commiss9on of the City af Anaheim did receive a
verified Pptition for Reclassification from .D & T LEASIP~G~ 4f16 Fernhill Lane,
Anahzim, C~1i4ornia 92807 (Owner); TAYLOR-DUP~N MANUFACTURI~~G COt1PA~~Y, Attn: R. Davis
Taylor, 2144 W. Qall Ro.ad~ Anaheim, California 92a04 (Agent) of certain real pro~erty
situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange~ State of California, described as:
The east a8 fest of Lot 3 of Traet No. 162, in the County of Orange, State of
Catifornia~ as p~r map recorded in book a2 nage 6 of Miscellanenus Maps, records
of said Orange County; and also
'the west 132 feat of Lot 3 of Tract P~o. 162. in the Cit,y of Anaheim. as per man
recorded in book 12, page 6 of Miscellaneous Maps. in the Office of the Count,y
Recorder; , •
EXCEPTING therefrom the easterly 1D6 feet of the northerly 100 feet of the
westerly 132 feet of Lot 3 of Tract 162, in the Ci+;,y of Anaheim, as per man
recorded in volume 9~ page 54 of Miscellaneous t4aps~ records of sa9d County.
WHEREAS, th~ City Planning Commission did hold a public hearin~ at the City
Hall in the City of Anahe9m on March 1, 1975, at 1:30 ~.m., notice of said public
hearing having been duly 9iven as required by law and in accardance with the
provisions of the Anaheim I4unicioal Code, Chapter 1t3.03. to hear and consider
evidence for and against said proposed reclassification and to investiqate and make
findings and recommendat9ons in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due insnection, investigation and stud,y made
by itself ard 9n its behalf. and a`ter due consideration of all evidence and renorts
offered at said hearing, does find and determine the following facts:
1. That the petitioner proposes a reclassification of the above-de~cribed
property from the CL (COtdMERCIAL, LIM'ITED) and RS-A-43,000 (RESIDENTIAL/AGRICULTURAL)
ZONES to the ML (I~IDUSTRIAL, LI~tI7ED) ZONE.
2. That the Anaheim General Plan de~ignates subject prooerty for c~eneral
commercial and medium-density residential e~ses.
3. That the proposed reclassi~fication of sub~ect property is necessar,y
and/or desirable for ~~he orderly and nroper development of the community.
4. That the oroposed reclassificati~n of subject prooerty does oroperly
r~late to the zones and their permitted us~s locally estab1ished in close proximity
to sub~ect property and ~o the zones and their nerm9tted uses qenerally established
throughout the cortmiunity.
5. That the Planning Commission does hereby determine that the use of the
property shall be limited to the manufacture of golf carts or similar industrial
elzctric and gas-powered vehicles and related wheel and accessor.y equioment, on the
basis that many permitted uses of the ML "Lane are not consistent with the develonment
of the surrounding area, but are consistent only with the existing tqL use on the
adjoining parce7 *.o the west.
6. That +,he petitioner stinulated that the proposed number and location of
drive~~vay accesses to Dall Road and the traffic circulation pattern will be submitted
to the Traffic Engineer for approval.
7. That no one indicated their presence at said public hearin9 in
opposition; and no corresnondence was received in opposition to sub~ect oetition.
ENVIRONMENTAL I~IPACT REPORT FIP~DING:
That the Anaheim City Planninq Commission does h~reby recorrmiend to the City
Council that the sub~ect pro~ect be exempt from the requirement ~o nreaare an
environmental impact report, pursuant to the orovisions of the California
Environmental Quality Act.
RESOLUTION N0. A~75~38~
NOW, Tf~EREFO BE IT RESOLVED that the An im City Planning Commission
does hereby recommend ~the City Council of the Ci~ of Anahelm that sub~ect
Pet9tion for Reclassificatien be approved and, by so do9ng, that Title lA-Zonir~g of
the Anaheim 14unicipal Code be anended to ex~lude the above-described aroFPrt,y from
the CL (COMM~RCIAL~ LIt4ITED) and RS-A-43,OOQ ~R~SIDENTIA!/AGRICULTURAL} ZOP~ES and to
incorporate said described property intc ~he P1L (INDUSTRIAL. LIMITED) ZONE upon the
following conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary orerequisite to the
proposed use of sub~ect property in order to preserve the safety and general v~elfare
of the Cit3zens of the City o` Anahe9m:
1. That sidewalks shall be installed alo~;a Bsll Road as required by the
City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans ,~nd s~:~cifications on f91e in the
Office of the City Engineer.
2. That the owner~s) of sub~ect property shall pay~ `o the City a° Anaheim
the sum of ~2.00 per front foot along Ball Road for street lighti•!nq ouraoses.
3. That the owner(s) of sub~ect nrooerty shall pay to the City of Anaheim
the sum of 60 cents per front foot along Ball Road for tree nlanting ourposes.
4. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with aoornved
plans on file with the Office of the Director of Pub19c lJorks.
5. That fire hydrants shali be instalted and ch~r~ied as required and
determined to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department pr~iar to commencement
of structural framing.
6. That t~e number and loc~tion of driveway accesses to Dall Road and the
traffic circulation pattern shall be sub~ect to the approval of the Traffic Enqineer,
as stipulated to by thE petitioner.
7. That the use of the sub~ect ~roperty sha11 be limited to the
manufacture of golf carts or similar industrial electric and gas-powered vehicles and
related wheel and accessory equipment.
8. Prior to the introduction of an ordinance rezoning sub~ect pra~erty,
Cond9t9on P~os. 2 an4 6, above-mentioned~ shatl be completed. The orovisions or
r9ghts granted by ~his resolution sha11 become null and void by action of the City
Councia unless said conditions are comnlied with within one Year from the date
hereof, or such further time as the City Council may grant.
9. That Condition Nos. 1 and 4~ above-mentioned* shall be complied with
prtor to final buildng and z~ning inspections.
THE fOREGOING RESOLUTIO~~ is signed and approved by me this lst da,y of
Narch, 1976.
-~/~ ~..~
~ ~ f~
ATTEST:
~~~~.e~;~~~
s~Tt€TARY;~INA~iEI 7 ~t ~ ` `~1PfT53TbA
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUYTY OR ORANGE )ss
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Patricia B. Sc~nlan. Secretary of tt?e City Planning Corrnnission of the
City of Anaheim, do hereby cer~i`y that the foregoing resolution was passed and
adopted at a mceting of the City Planning Comr,ission oP the City of Anah2im, hQld on
March 1, l976, at 1:30 p.~n., by the foll4w~ing va~e of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BARNES, JOHNSON~ K:M~.'MORLEY, TOLAR~ FARANO
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: I~ERaST
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: i~ONE
IN WITt~ESS WHEREOF~ I have hereunto set my hand this lst day of March, 1976.
~~~ r~~ F~ ~~~~,-/ TffR'
.
_2.. RESOLUTION N0. PC76-38 '