PC 76-86,~ ~ ~
RESOLi1TI0N NQ. PC7~-$f+
A RES~LUTION OF THF ANAHFIM CITY PLAI7tlING COMHISSIQiJ THAT PFTITI~F~
FOR CONQITlONAL US~ PERMIT NQ. 1h17 (RF.ADVFpTISFD) BF RRA~~TFO, IM PART.
WHEREAS, the Ana'~eim City Plannin~ Commission dirl rPCPive a vPrlfied
Petition for Conditional Use Permit Trom BAPIK OF AMERIC/1, 555 S. Flrnier Street, Los
Angeles, California 90071 (O~~ner); VERNON MOP:ROE, 52~~ Seashore ~rive, Me4~port Re~ch,
California ?2Ff+0 (Agent) of certafn real nroperty situated in the City nf Anaheim,
County of clrange, State of California descrihed as:
THAT P(1RTION OF THE EAST HALF OF THE HORTI!EAST QUARTFR OF THF PJQP,TNF.AST QUARTER
OF SECTION 7, TQWNSHIP 4 S~UTH, RAMf,E 1~ WEST, IN THE RAt1CN0 LQS C~YOTFS, CITY Of
AMAHE I M, COUNTY OF ORANr.,E, STATE OF CAL I FORN I A, AS SA 1 D SECT I nN I S SNO~•~N o"! A!~AP
RECORDED !N BOOK 5T PAGE 10 OF MISCELLANE0115 MAPS, IN TNE ~FFICF. OF THE Cn(INTY
RECORDER OF SAID COt1NTY, DF.SCRIBED AS F~LLn~as:
DEG I tJN I N8 AT THF. P01 NT OF I NTERSEf,T I ~td OF TfIE SOUTHI•IESTERLY L I P![ OF TIIE LAH~
DESCRIRED IN THE DEED TO WESTERN DEVF.LnpMF~~T Cr1MPA1dY, RECf1RDED JIIME 1~, 1'7~ I"I
BQOK 44 PAGE 496 OF DFEnS, RECORDS oF La5 ANr,FLFS COnNTY, CALIFnRtlIA brITH THF.
EAST LINE OF THE NOP,TNEAST QUARTFR O~ SAID SECTIQ'I 7; THEI~CE SOl1TH na 43' 'i~"
EAST ALONG TF1E EAST Ll~lc OF SAID SEf.TION 7 T(1 THE N~RTHFAST f,ORPIF.R OF THF
SOUTHEAST OUARTER OF THE Nf)RTNEAST O.UARTER OF SAID SECTI~~J 7; THENf,E V!EST AL~~If,
THE NQRTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHE.45T QUARTER OF THE MORTf~FAST OUARTER OF SA1f1 SFf,Ti~~~
7 TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER Q~ THE EAST HALF OF SAIl1 SOUTHEAST O.UARTFR OF THF
NORTHEAST QUARTER qF SAID S~CTION 7; T{1ENf,F NORTH ALOtiG THF "~ORTHERLY EXTF.NSIO~~
OF TNE WEST LINE 4F THE EAST H11LF OF SAI~ SQUTfiEAST OUARTER OF THF. ~JORTHFAST
QUARTER OF SAID SEf,T10N 7 TO THE SQUTH LINF OF PARf.EL 1 D~SCRIRED I~i TfIF DEE~ Tf1
HERBER'f A. JOHNSTON, RECnRDF.D FERR~IARY Q, 1Q47 IN BOOK 11?.~ PA~F. ~3 OFFIr.IAL
RF.CORDS; TIIENCE N(1RTH RP,° 3~3' ~!0" F.AST AL~IIt; SAI~ SOUTH LIt1F. T~ THF S~I~THFA57
CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 1, AS D[SCRIRED IN SAID DF.ED TO HF.RBERT A, JOHNST~"1; THENf,E
WORTH Q° 43' 36" WEST ALQNG TIIE EAST LIt1E OF SAID PARCEL 1 TO THE SOI~THldESTF.PLY
LIIJE OF SAID LAND CQ~~VEYED TQ WFSTERN DF.UFLOPMF.PIT C~MPAMY; THENCF. SOUTH ,7° '2'
36" EAST ALON~ SA I D SOIITHWESTE~LY L I NE TQ THF. P01 ~lT ~F BE ; I tIN I!It;,
EXCEPT TNOSE PORTIONS DESCRINED I~J A DEED TO ST~TF ~F CALIFORD~IA RFC~Rf1FD J11NF.
14, 1q5~ IN BOOk 2027 PAr,E 1?.~ OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, BY DEED RFC~RI1Et1 FF?R~I.qP,Y 25~
1955 IN BOQK 2973 PAr,E 60 OF OFFICIAL RECnRDS, AtID BY DEED RECORDED SEPTEt1BER ~+,
1974 IN BOOK 112?5 P/1GE ~336, OF OFFICIAL RF.CORDS.
WfiEREAS, the City Planninq Commission did schedule a public hearing at the
City Hall in the City of Anaheim on April 17., 197h, at 1:3~ P.m., notice of said
public hearing having been duly given as required by laai and in accordance with the
provisions of the Anaheim Munictpal Code, Chapter 1n.~3, to hear and consider
evidence for and against said proposed conditional use and to investiqate and make
findings and recommendations in connection there~•iith; said puhlic hearinq havina hPen
continued to the Planning Commission of May 1~, 1A7(i; and
IJHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigatfon and stu~ly r~ar1P
by itself and in tts behalf, a~d after due consideration of all evidence and reports
offered at said hearing, does find and determine the following facts:
1, ThaC the proposed use is properly one for ~ahich a c~nditinnal use
permit is authorized by Code Section 1R,~1+,n5n.13~, to aiit: permit a church and
church school in a planned commercial center i~ the CL (C~~1NF.RCIAL, LIMITF.fI) Znt•IE,
with waivers of:
a. 5ECTION iR,OG.Q~iQ - Minimum numher of arl;inq spaces.
5 3 required; 233 proposed
b. SELTIOPI 1~.4~~.~2n - Permitted uses. (Industrial uses
- not permitte~f
c. SECTIQN 1Q.44.062.011 - Maximurn structural height. (15 feet
xistin
)
1(~
t
d
g
ee
e
;
and ? i? eet nermitte
SECTION
d 13.44.063,Q40 - Minimum structural setback.
. 1!1 eet required; 5 feet existinc~)
e. SECTIQN 1R,h4.068 - RequirPd site screening. ~~-~~ot masonr
d
wall required; none propose
RESOLUTION N~. PC76-3F
~ ~
2, That the petitioner s*.ipala[ed that the pronnsed church schnol
consisted of Sunday school activities orily, and that ~ny expansion of the church t~
other than typical church functions would he s~n.i~~c Yn the revie~•~ ind anp mval of
the Planning Commission.
3. That Waiver 1-a, above-men[ioned, was withdr!m~m hy the petitinner 4iith
the stipulatton that a revised and specific plan showinq the fixed seatin~ in the
place of main assembly within the church would he submitte~i to the Plannin~a
Department and would indicate the proposed parking spaces woulrt he nrovi~iPd in
conformance with Code standards.
G. That Waiver 1-b, ahove-mentioned, is herehy granted to permit certain
light industriai uses, as s~ecifiCd hy the Anaheim City Planning Commission, said
r~aiver being granted on the basis that the petitioner demonstrated that a hardshin
i•iould be created if not granted, since the location of the prooerty is n~t suited for
a limited commercial shopping center with vchicula~• accessihility and visihility
being substantially restricted from the nearhy arterial hi9h~•iay hecause of the ahove-
grade freeway on- and off- ramps.
5. That Waivers 1-c and 1-d, ahove-mentioned, are herehy grante~i on the
basis that the structures are existing and a har~lship ~vould, th~reforP, he created if
said taaivers were not granted.
6. That Waiver 1-e, ahove-mentioned, is herPhy granted, in part, on the
basis that the petitioner proposas to construct an R-foot high masonry wall al~ng the
west property 1•ine and that Yhe existing chainlink fence sep~rating the suhject
property from the RS-A-h3,~~~ ~~ne~f property to the south may rem~in bec~use sai~f
property is developed with a public school.
7, That the 'proposed use, as granted, ~•rill not a~lversely affect the
adjoining land uses and the growth an~i devel~pment nf the arPa in aihich it is
proposed to be located.
A. That the size and shape of the site pr~o~szd for the USP.~ as ~ranter~,
is adequate to allow the full ~ievelopment of the proposed use in a manner not
detrimental to the particular area nor to the peace, health, safety anrl general
welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim.
Q That the Condttional llse Permit, as 9ranted, and under the r,on~iiti~ns
imposed, will not be rletrimental to the peace, health, safety an~1 ceneral welfare of
the Citizens of the City of ~naheim.
t!1, That one (1) person appeared, representinn two (2) perscas present at
said pubiic hearing in opposition; and no eorrespondence was received in ti~oosit~~m
to sub,ject petition.
ENVIRONMEIJTAL IMPACT REP~RT FItJDIt~G:
That the Anaheim ~ity ?lanning Commission does herehy recommen~l tn the Citv
Cnuncil that the subject proJect be exen~t from the requirement to nrep~rr. an
environmental impact report, pursuant to the provisions of the California
Environmental 2uality Act.
NOW, THEREFQRF, BE IT RESOWF.D that the Anaheim City Planning f.ommission
does hereby grant, in part, subJect Petiti~n for Cor,~litional Use Permit, upon the
following conditions which are hereby found to he a necessary prerequisite to the
proposed use of the subJect property in order to prr.serve the safPty ancf genPr~l
o~elfare of Lhe Citizens of the City of Anaheim:
1, That sidewalks shall be installed alon~ Sequoia Avenue and Rr~okhurst
Street as reyuired by the City Engin~er and in accordance with stand:~r~i plans anci
specifications on file ln the Office of the Ctty Engineer.
2, That street llghting facilities along Sequoia Avenue an~1 Rrnokhurst
Street shall he insCalled as required by the Director of Puhlic Ittilittes, anrl in
accordance with standarcl plans and snecifications ~n file in the Cffice nf the
Director of Public Utilities; or that a bond in an amount and form satis~actory to
the City of Anaheim shall he posted with the ~icy to guarantee the installati~n of
thc: above-mentioned requirements.
3, In the event that subJect prorer':Y is to he ddvided for thr_ purpose of
sa'le, lease, or financing, a parcei map, tn recorri the ~pproved divisiun of suh~ect
_~_ RESQLUTIQM N0, PC7F-~~
~ ~
property shall be submttted to and approved by the City of Anahe~m an~! then be
recorded in the offir,e of the Orange County Re~order.
Q, That the existing struc:tures shall be br~ught up to the minimum
standards of the City of Anaheim, including the tlniform Ruilding, Plumbinq,
Elzctrical, Mechanical and Fire Codes as adepted hy the City of Anaheim.
5, That the northernm~st driveway ~n D'~okhurst Street shall he closed an~1
replaced with standard curb an~t gutter and sideti•relk.
G, That trash storaye areas shall be provided in accordance with apnr~ved
plans on file with the Office of the Direct~r of Puhlic W~rks.
7, That fire hydra~ts shall he installed and charged as required and
determined to be necessary by thP Chief of the Fire Department prior to commencr.ment
of structural framing.
$, That sub}ect propert~~ shall be developed suhstantially in acc~rdance
~aith plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked Exhihit Plos. 1
and 2; pr~vided, however, that an A-foot hic~h masonry wall shall he constructe~i along
the west property line, as stipulated to hy the netitioner; and tFat parkinc~ spaces
shall be provided in accordance with Code standards and, therefore, i~ order to
determine the number of parking spaces reautred, pians shall be submitt.ed to the
P'.anning Department for approval indicating the numher of fixed seats in the ~lace of
main assembly inside the propo~ed church facilities, as stipul~ted to hy the
oetitioner.
9, That Conditlon Nos. 2 and 3, above-mentioned, shall he complied with
prior to the commencement of the activity authorized under this resolution, or prior
to the time that the 6uilding permit is issued, or within a period of one (1) Ye~r
from date hereof, whichever eccurs first, or such further time as the Planninq
Commission and/or City C~uncil may grant.
~p, That Condition Hos. 1, ~~, 5, ti, and P,, ahove-mentioned, shall be
complied with prior to final huilding and zonin9 inspections.
11. That this conditional use permit ts granted to nermit certain light
industrial uses on the sub_ject property; and, in order to provide guidelines for
Planning Department determination as t~ tvhether specific uses are permitted, the
following may be permitted as indicated:
a. Cabinet shops and carpentry shops (including the sale and
fahrication of picture ~rames); provided, however, that t!~is use
chall be limited to a maximum of five (5) empl~yees.
U. Mail order firms.
c. Product fabrication; prnvided, hooiever, each use which is intended
to qualify under this classification shall he suhmitted in written
form to the Planning Commission for reviea~ and approval in orrler
that a determination may be made as to ~ahether the nr~nosed use
would be appropriate for the site.
d. Research and tzsting firms, such as architectural and engineering
' firms.
e. Wholesale businesses, includin9 storage, light warehnusing ancl
product disnlay of light pr~ducts such as paper, small nnvelty
items, glasswork, etc.
f. Automobile and boat repair, including mechanical, f~l?ricatian an~1
painting oF automobiles a~d hoats; provided; ho+aever, that this
use shall be subJect to Planning Commission approval and shall he
restricted as follows (as stipulated to by the petitioner):
(1) A maximum of five (5) employees,
(T) No business activtty shall be conducted on Sunday,
(3) The use shall be restrlcted to tenancy in the existing
approximately ~~,SQ~ square foot building which is lacated in
the southwest corner of the suhJect property, ~nrl sai~
buil~iing shall not be expanded in any manner.
_3_ RESOLUTION N0, PCj~-~F
~ ~
(b) All business activity shall be conducted inrioors.
If ambiguity exists concerning a particular request in connection
with permitted uses under this conditional use perm?t. the matter
shall he suhmitted to the Planning Commission f~r determTnatinn.
The appllcant may appeal any Plannin9 Department decision to the
Planning Commisslon.
THE FOREGOIN~ RESOLlITION is signed ancl approved hy me this l~th day of
Nay, 197F.
~
-- C AIR:~I1N PROT` ORF.
ANAHE114 CITY PLANNIMG COMMISSI~t!
ATT[ST:
,~Lr~c~a.~ c , ~J
SECRETARY, A~IAHEIM Cl Y PLANIIING COM!11SSIO~J
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF QRANfE )ss.
CITY OF AtJAHEIM ) .
I, Patricia B. Scanlan, Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the
City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was p~ssed an~l
adopted at a meeting of the City Planning Commission ~f the City of Anaheim~ held nn
May 10, 1Q7F~, at 1:3~ P.m., by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: i.DMMIS510NERS: BARNF.S, J~IINSOPI~ I:IN6, MORLEY, TOLAR~ HFRRST
tJOES: COMMISSIONERS: MOtdE
ARSEtJT: Cf1MI11SS10NERS: FARAt10
IN IJITtIECS blHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 1~th day of t1ay, 1~7~.
O~J,~~~~
SECRcTARY, At~AHE I11 C ITY PLA~P.~ I tJG CO'^.M I SS I ~~I
_4_ RESOLUTl01a N0. PC76-A6