PC 76-870
RESOLUTION N0. PC76-87
0
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING CO~fNI5510N
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL dF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION fOR RECLASSIFICATION N0. 75-7~-33 BE APPROVED.
WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission did receive a verified
Petition for Reclassificatton from MINNIE B. 91ERBERGER, 1~+3° W• Damon Avenue,
Analieim, California 92302 (Owner) of certaln real property sit~ated in the City of
Anaheim, County of Oran9e, State of California described as:
That portion of the West half of the Northwest quarter of the Northeast quarter
of Section 21, Toamship 4 South, Range 10 West, S. B. B. b M., descrihed as
folla,~s:
Be~inning aC a point in the North line of sald West half distant thereon North
$9 33' Z8" East 344.06 feet from the Northwest corner thereof, and running thence
South J° 10' S9" East, 195 feet; thence So~±th 89° 33' 28" West 8.57 feet; thence
South Q° 10' S9" East 55 feet; thence South 2~° 33' 2$" ~dest 125.54 feet; thence
North 0~ 09' 34" West fi9.85 feet to the begtnning of a tangent curve concave
Easterly and havin9 a radius of 50 feet; thence Northerly along said curve,
through a central angle of 3h° 52' 1?" a distance of 32.1$ feet to a reverse
curve concave Westerly and havi~g a radius of 5(1 feet; thence IJortherly, along
said curve through a central angle of 126° 52~ 12" a distance of 110.7~ feet;
thence North 9° 0~' 3~+" West 70 feet to the North tine of said West half; thence
North 89° 33' 28'~ East, 164.07 feet; more or less, to the point of beginning.
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City
Hall in the City of Anaheim on May 10, 1?76, at 1:30 P.m., notiee of said public
hearing havi~g been duly given as required by law and in accordance t•iith the
provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.03~ to hear and consider
evidence for and against saSd proposed reclassification and to investigate and make
findings and recommendations in connectton therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after dae inspection, investigation and study made
by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reoorts
offered at said hearing, does find and determine the following facts:
1. That the petitioner proposes a reclassification of the above-described
property, from the Rs-n-43,000 (RESIDEtJTIAL/AGRfCULTURAL) ZUNE to the RS-5~00
(RESIDEN7IAL, SINGLE-FAMILY) 20NE, to establish a four-lot suhdlvision.
2. That the Anaheim General Plan designates subJect property for low-
density residential land uses.
3. That the proposed reclassification of subJect praperty is necessary
and/or desirable for the orderly and proper devetopment of the community.
4, That the proposed reclassificatlon of subJect property does properlY
relate to the zones and their permitted uses locally established in close proximity
to subject property and to the zones and their permitted uses generally estahlisheci
throughout the community.
5, That Cwo persons appeared, representing three persons present at said
public hearir9 in opposition; and no correspondence was received in opposition to
subject petition.
ENVIROIJMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FINDING:
7hat the AnaheiT CiLy Planning Commission does hereby recommend to the Ci::y
Counci{ tfiat the sub}ect project be exempt f~om the requtrement to prepare an
environmental impact report, pursuant to the Frovisions of the California
E~viror,mental Quality Act.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission
d~~es hereby recommend to the City Council of the Ctty of Anaheim that suhJect
Petiti~n for Reclassification be approved and, by so doing~ that Title 18-Zoning of
the Anaheim Municipal Code be amended to exclude the ahove-described property from
the RS-A-43,000 (RESIDENTIAL/AGRICULTURAL) 20PlE and to incorporate said described
property into the RS-50Q0 (RESIDEPITIAL~ SINGLE-FAMILY) ZONE upon the following
RESOLUTION N0, PC76-87
~ ~
conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary prereguisite to the proposed use
of subject property in order to preserve the safety and general 4relfare of the
Citizens of t.fie Ci~y of Anaheim:
1. That street lighting faciiities along Ball Road and Hampstead Street
shall be installed as required by the Director of Public Utilities and in accordance
with standard plans and specifications on file in the Off~ce of the Director of
Public Utilities, or that a bond in an amount and Torm satisfactory to the City of
Anaheim shall be posted with the City to guarantee the installation of the ahove-
mentio~ed requirements.
2. That the owner(s) of subject property sholl pay to the Cicy of Anahein
the sum of 60 cents per front foot atong BaIT Road and Hampstead Street for treP
planting pe~poses.
j. That the vehicu{ar access rights, except at approved access points to
aall Road shall be dedicated to Lhe City of A~aheirt~.
4. That subject property shall be served by underground utiiiCies.
5. 7hat dralnage of subJect property shall be disposed of in a manner
satisfactory to the City Engineer.
6. In the event that subject property is to be divided for the purpose of
sale, lease. or financing, a parce{ map, to record the approved division of subject
property shall be submitted to and approved by the City of Anaheim and then 6e
recorded in the office of the Orange County Recorder prior to the tssuance of a
buiiding permit.
7. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the
appropriate park and recreation in-lteu fees as determined to be appropriate by the
City Council, said fees to be paid at the ti~ie the building permit is issued.
8. That appropriate water a::sessment fees as determined by the Director of
Public Utillties shall be paid to the City of Anaheir~~ prior to the issuance of a
building permit.
9. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance
with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit tlo. 1.
10. Prior to tlie introduction of an ordinance rezoning subject property,
Condition Nos. 1, 2, and 3, above-mentioned, shall be completed. The provisions or
righ~s granCed by this resolution shall become null and void by action of the City
Council unless said conditions are complied with within one year from the date
hereof, or such further time as the City Council may grant.
11. That Condition Nos. 4 and 5, above-mentioned, shall be compl~ed with
prior to final building and zoning inspections.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by rt~e this 1~th clay of
Hay, 1976.
~ ~
~
C AI MAFI P HPORE
` AtJ~HEI!1 CiTY PLANNiMf, COMMISSIOPI
ATTEST:
.<~~~ . ~2A~~
SECRE AR , Atl H N CI LANNING OMM!SSION
-2- RESOLUTIO'~ N0. PC7f~-87
. ~ ~
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY Of ORANGE )ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Patricia B. Scanlan. Secretary of thc City Planning Commtssion of the
City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and
adopted at a meeting of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, held on
May 10, 1976, at 1:30 p.m., by the. following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: 6ARNES~ JOHNSON, KING, MORLEY, TOLAR, HERRST
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: CQMMISSIONERS: FARAtJO
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunt~ set my hand this 10th day of May, 1976.
(~~~~,~,~~~ ~~
S[CRETARY, ANAIiE l l1 C 17Y PLAN~I I Dlf, CO!1M I SS I ~r1
-j- RESOLUTION DlO. PC76-87