PC 77-106RESOLUTIOtI N0. PC77-1~E
A RESOLUTIOIJ OF TUL At1AilEiM CITY PLIIN~IING CUHNISSIOF7
RECONt1Et~DIHG TO TIiE C17Y COUf~CIL OF TIiE CITY UF A1JAfiElht
THAT PETiilOtl FOP, R~CLASSIFICATIOt~ ~10. 7G-77-51 GE A?PROVED
Wt1EREA5, the Anahcim City Planning Conmission did receive a verified
Petition for Reclassification frorn WILLIAt1 P. A!1~ EHNA S. BRLGDER, 1629 Ricky Avenue,
Anah~im, Callfornia 920~2, owners of certain real propcrty situated in the City of
Anaheim, County of Oran~~e, State of California, described as:
PORTIO!J /1 - Tiie Westcrly 21ti.U0 fect of Lot 1 of Tract No. 2222,
as shown on a map thereof recor~IeJ in Boo4: 113, Payes 23 throuc~h
25 inclusive of 1liscellaneous Maps, rn_cor~s of saiJ County, excep[
the Southerly 100.r,~ fect thereof and which parcel is descrihed as
be$inning a[ [he Worthwesterly corner of said LoL 1; thence South
~9 05' 0~~" East, "I.16.OJ feet; thence South 0° 5~' ~~'~ West,
'1U0.2A feet ta a line parallel witn and 1Q~.0(1 fect Mor[herly
measured ~t right anglcs from the tangential portion of the
Southerly lin~ of said Lot 1; thence along said parallel line
h~rth G9° 15' S3" lJest, 21G.00 feet [o Lhe westerly line of said
Lot 1; thence alony said Westerly line f~or[n 0° SS' ZO" East,
'L00.93 feet to [he poin[ of beginning; a~d
PORTION B- The Southerly 100.00 fect of [he Westerly 21G.OQ feet
of Lo[ 1 of Tract Ito. 2222, as sliown on a map thereof recorded in
Uook 113, Payes 23 t6~rougli 2j inclusive of Miscellaneous Maps,
records of saiJ County and which parcel is described as beyinning
at the poin[ of in[crsection of the Wes[erly line of said Lu~". i
and a line parallcl with and 100.OD feet Northerly mcasured
right angles fe~rz~ tlie tan,ential por[ion of thc '"s~~therly line ~;f
said Lo[ i; thence along said par~ltel line South 2~3° 15' ~.~~~~
Easi, 216.OQ feet; Chence South 0° 55' 20" 41est, 100.00 fee[ [o
said Soutfierly line; thencc along said Soutticrly line North a9~
~~~ 5;" West, 2Q0.9~ feet to the be9iniiir.q of a curve corcave
t~ortheasterly having a radius o4 15.00 feet; thence along said
curve throuyh a cen[ral anyle of 90° il' 13" an arc Jistance of
23,(,1 f~e[ to said Westerly line; [hencc alony saiJ 41est.erly line
North 0° 55' 20" East, &4.y~ fee[ to thc point of beginning; and
4Fr1EREA5, the City Plannin9 Commission did hold a public heariny at the Lity
liall in Lhe Lity of Anali~im on May 23, 1977, at 1:3~ P•m., notiee of said publtc
hearing haviny been duly given as required by law and in accordance wtth the
provisions of the Ananeim Municipal Code, Chap[er 10.03, [o hcar and consider
evidence for and a9ainst saiJ proposed reclassification and to investiya[e and make
findings and reconmenda[ions in connectio~ therewith; and
4(t1EP.[AS, said Commission, after duc inspection, investigation and study rtiade
by itself and in its bchali, and after due consideration of all evlde~ce and reports
ot'fereJ at said hcaring, docs find and detc:rmine thc following facts:
PC77-106
1. That the petitioner proposes reclassification of Lhe subject proper[y
from the CG (LOMMERCIAL, GEIlERALj ZOtic to the Rti-1200 (P,ESIb[NTIAL, MUL7iPLE-FAMILY)
ZOIIE on Por[ion "A" and to thc CL (C01".MEitCI~L, LIf11TCD) ZOt~E on P~rtio~ "B".
2. That the Ansheim Gehcral Plan designates subject property for yeneral
cor,vnercial and/or mediw~-deiisity resiuential land ~ses.
3. That [he proposed reclassification of subject proper[y is necessary
and/or desirable fcir the orderly and proper devclopment of ~hc conmunity.
4, That ihe propos~o reclassification of subject property does properly
rela[e to Ciic zones and their pcr~.~i[tcd uses locally established in close proximity
to subject property and to tnc zoncs anJ thcir perrnitted u:es qenerally established
throughout the conxnuni ty.
;;,. That rio onc inJicat~d thcir prescncc at said public hcaring in
opposition; and [iiTt no corres~~onuence was receive~ in opoosition to subject
petition.
ENVIfi0N11EI~TAL IMPACT F11lUltl~: Tha[ the Anahcim CiCy Planring Co~mission has
reviewed Che subje vC proposal to reclassify the property from GG (Commercial,
General) to RH-12(i~i (ResiJcntial, Multi~~le-Fa~,iiiy) on Poriion ";." (approxir.ia[ely 1
aere loeated approximately 16l fee[ north of [hc cen[erline of KaC~lla Avenue) and
from CG (Corrnercial, General) to (Comr,ercial, Lini[ed) on Vortion "b" (approximately
0.5 acre located at the northcas[ corncr of I:atclla Avenuc anJ [asy Way) and does
hereby recormend to the City Councii of the Lity of Anaheim that a Ne~ative
Declaration from the requirenent [o prepare an environmental impaci re{~ort be
approved on thc basis that :hcrc rro uld tc no sic,anifican[ individual or cumulative
adverse environrx:ntal ir,pact duc to the approval of this tle9ative Ueclaration since
the Anaheim Gencral Plan designates thc subject propcrty for yeneral
eortuncreial/medium-~ensity resi~~ntial lanJ uses comrx:nsurate with thc proposal, and
the Ir.itial Study submitted by [he petitioncr inJi w tes no significan[ aJversc
environanental ir~iaac[; and [ha[ the Ilegative Ueclaration substantiaciny thc foregoing
findings is oii file in the Ci[y tlall.
11Q4l, TH[RcFOP,E, b[ IT RE50LVLJ [hat the Anaheiin City Planning Commission
does hereby recommen~ to the City Council of the City of Anaheim that subject
Petition ~or Reclassifica[ion be approved ancl, by so doing, tha[ Title 12-Zoning of
the llnaheira Municipal Code be amenJeJ to exclude Portiorr "~" from [he CG (COHMERCIAL,
GENERAL) ZOIJL and to incorporate said describeJ propcrty into Che RM-1200
(kESIDEtJTIAL, HULTIPL't-FAI1ILY) ZOI~C, ana to exclude Por[ion "I~" from the CG
(COHf1ERCIAL, G[tlEFJ1L) ZOIIE and to incorporate said described property into the CL
(C011M[RCIl,L, LIItITED) ZOt~C upon tiie follo+ding condi[ions which are hcreby found to be
a necessary prerequisi[e to [tie propos~d use of subject properCy 1~ order to preserve
the safety an~7 general ~aelfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim:
Ir~TERDEPARTNEtiTAL COMHITTEC R[COMMEI~OATIOtlS IF APPROVED:
1. That the owncr(s) uf subje ct property shall pay to the City of Hnaheim the
sum of 60 cents pcr front fooi along Easy Nay and t:a[ella Avenue for trce
planting purposes.
2. That [he owncr(s) of subjc•ct property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the
sum of 52.00 per fron[ foot alony Easy Way and ICatella Avenue for street
ligh[iny purposes.
-2- PC17-~OG
3. Tha[ appropriatc water assessi~ent fees, as detcrmined by tfie Director of
Public Utiltties, shail 'ne paid [o the City of Anahein prior to the issuance
of a buildiny permit.
4. That [he proper[y owner(s) shatl submit a let[er reques[ing termination of
Conditional Use Permit No. iG>G.
5. Prior to the ir~troduction of an ordinance rezoning subject property.
Londitio~ Nos. 1, 2 an~ 4, abovc-mentioned, shall be completed. The
provisions or riglits granted by this resolution shall become null and void
by action of the City Council unless said conditions are complied wi[h
within one year from the datc hcrcof, or such further tirrk as the City
Council may grant.
THE FOFEGOItIG R[SOLUTIOtI is signed and approved by me this 23rd day of May,
1977.
____LCY~ ~ ~~'~
ct ~iR~ nt,ri Pno ~r~~o!:E'
AIJ/U1EIt1 CITY PLl1!~tJING CONHISSION
ATTEST:
~~..~.pC. 07.° `,~-
SECRETARY, AlINIEIII ITY LA~1~IIt~G COMIIISSIOt~
STATE OF LAL I FORtJ 1 A)
COUN7Y OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF AHAIiEIM )
I~ Edith L. Harri:;. S,ec~ret.ary ~f c~uc At::i.till`ir,~ ti~c'_y P.tann -m Ce~;~rnfss ion, do
hereby certify that the fore;oiny resolut'•~;n was ~P`ssed ana: adc~pte~ y't a meezing of
[he Anaheiri City Plannina Gommii§iot~ n~;~:l o^ Hyy 23, 1y77, aF ~~30 p.n., by the
following vote of the mec~cr tlvereof:
AYES: LONItISSIONEItS: (tAR~.'FS~ DAVIU, HEf~~~.;, ti,,,~;, ll ~iN, ToI.A;,
NOES: CONPIISSIOI~ERS; NOIIL
AIiSENT: CONHISSIONE~S: JOHN:~UII
I1~ tJITUE55 41NEREUF, I hav~ hc ~,:unto set r,,y rand :rhis 23rd day of Nay, 1977,
CO ~ ~ ~'~~/~/~Llci
SLGRETARY, NAH IM I Y LANtJIt~G OMMIS Ot~
-3- PC77-i0G