PC 77-119RESOLUTt01~ N0. r^C77-119
A RESOLUTl01J OF THE A1~AifEili CITY PLAIl;IIt~G L0~1"115510N
TfiAT PETITIOt~ FOZ CONUITIOI~AL USE PERIIIT N0. 1713 BE DEt~I[D
Wi1EREA5, Lhe Anaheim Ciiy Planning Commission did receive a verified
Peti tion for Condi tional Use Permi t frorn LI1NA CORPOP,l~TIOtI, g34 Cfies[nut 5[reet,
Escondido, California 92025, ayner, and LYI~iJ E. Tt10liSFN, )10 ~~or[ii Euclid Street,
/,'22?., Anaheim, California 92i301, agent, of certain real situated in the City of
Anaiieim, County of Oranye, Statc of California, dcscribed as:
That portion of Lot 40 of tfie Ana;ieim Extension, as shuwn on a Map
of a Survey by Wiliiam Harncl in Deceinber, IEG~ and filed in the
Office of the Coun[v Recorder of Los P.n,eles County, Califo rnia,
bounded as fo1la,~s: Northerly by Che Southerly righ[ of way linc
of La Palma Avenue, 103.00 feet wide; Southeriy by the Northerly
line of the land described in Deed to Anaheim Scfiool District of
Orange County, recorded ~anuary 24, 1930 in 3ook 19~7, pagc 518 of
Official Records and Easterly and Westerly by the Nortf~erly
prolongation of [hc Eas[erly and Westcrly lincs respec[ively of
said land of Anahcin School District of Oran~e Lounty; and
uHEREAS, the Cicy Planning Lommission did h
Ha;l in the City of Anaheim r~n Junc b, 1977, a[ 1:30
hearing havin5 been duly yiven as requir~d by
provisions of [he Anaheim Municipal ~odc, Chapter
evidence for and against said proposed conditional
findings and recommendations in connection thereo~ith;
old a public hearing a[ the City
p.n,., notice of said puFlic
law an~ in accordance with the
18„Uj, to hear and consiJer
usc anJ to investigatc anJ make
a~d
WHERE.?SE said Connission, afccr duc :nspection, investigation and study made
by itself and in its behal`, and ;,fter due consideration of all e~idence and reports
offered at said heariny, does find and dct~ ntiine the following facts:
1. Tha~ the proposed use is properly one ror •Nhich a conditional ~se
permit is authorized under au[harity of Code Seciion 1d.03.0;J.010 to persnit outdoor
s[orage witla v:aivers of:
a. SECTI01~ 1tt.04.043.101 - Naxirwm fence heiqht
'1. inclies permitted; 6 fcei proposed)
b. SECTION 18.t~~i.i16;.050 - Minimum landscapin .
0 se[ require ; none proposed)
2. That [he proposed usc is hereby denied on the basis that the petitioner
did not demonstrate tha[ a h~rdship would hc crcat~d if sai~a use were denied; and,
although the U,se ~~as proposed as a[emporary use, pe[itioner was unable t~ designa[e
a time lir~itation.
3. That the proposed use will adversely affect the adjoining land uses and
the growth and development of the ar:.,: in which it is proposed ;o be located,
Pc77-tt9
4. That [he _ize and s~ape of [hc si-te rropased for the use is not
adequate to ailovr the full development of the proposed ~~se in a maroner rtmt
detrimental to the par[icular area nor to the peace, heattfi, sa`ety, anrJ ger~eral
welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anafiein.
5, That tlie grantiny of the Conditional Use Pernit wi1l be d~etrimenCaA Ro
the peace, health, safety and general rrelfare of the Citizens of the Lity of Anahe~im.
G. That no one indicated their presenc~ at said p~blic nearin~ in
opposition; and that no correspondence was received in opposition tc~ Xf~e subject
petition.
EIlVIROIiHENTAL IMPACT FI~JUING: Th~t the A~af,eim City Planninq CommissSon has
reviewed the subject proposal to ~ermit CU'id'JOf storage with waivers of rnaximum fence
t'°ight and nrinimum landscaping nr an irregularly-st7aped parcel consisting, of O.G acre
lo~ated on the south side of ~a Palma levenuc, approxinately 365 feet ~+est of [he
centerline ~f Harbor t3ou'tevard, and does hereby recomnend ta the Ci2y 'Louncil of the
City c,F Anaiirim that a Neqative Declaration from the reyuircment to prepare an
envirunmental impact report be denied for the subject pr•oject on ttie basis tha[ [here
would be a signifi w nt adverc~ environr.ien[a' impac[ on tfie ncighborhoo•!.
NOIJ, 7i1ER[FORE, D[ '.T RE~O!IyEU that the Anaheim City ~Pianning Cwmission
does hereby deny suhject Pe[ition for Con~iitional Use Permit on the basis of the
aforementioned findi;igs.
~~%7•
TNE FOREGOIIIG R[SOLU71~t~ is siyned and approved by me thi, E[h day of ;une,
(~ ~~^'~~_
Ct I RtiAtJ PRO TEMPOP,E
AfIAHEIM CITY PLAIdIl1NG COMMISSION
ATTEST:
~~ ~ ~~
SECR[TAP,Y, AF~AHEIM C17Y PLAUPJItIG !'~HM1551Qti
STATL OF C{1LIFORNIA }
COU~ITY OF OR/1~JGE ) ss.
CITY OF AtU1H[IFt )
I, Editli l. Harris, Secre[ary of tl~e Analieim City Planning Cortmission, do
hereby certify that tt:e foregoiny resolution was passcd and adop~ed at a meeting of
thc Anaheim City Planning Commission held on June G, 1)77, at 1:3U ~.rn.~ by the
fotlowing vote of the m~:mbers thereof:
AYES: LOHI115510NER5: fIERl35T, t.ItIG, TOLAit
Ii0E5: COHMISSIOI~ERS: [3AP,NES, UAVID
A,~S[NT: COt1MISSIONEP,S: JO{itlSUla, Lltli!
IN WITt~[5S ~.JIIEREOF, I have h~:rs°.~,to set my hand this 6th day of Ju~e, 1977.
`~~ ~~ ° ~~~
SECRETARY, AIlAIIEIM CITY PLAFlNING COHHISSIOIJ
-2- PC77-119