Loading...
PC 77-148RESOLUTIOtI t~0. PC77-143 A RES~LUFI011 0~ THE AtJAHEIM CiTY PLAtii11~JG COMMISSION TfiAT PETITI011 FOR P,ECLAS~IFICATION N0. 76-77-64 BE GRAt~TED WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission did receive a verified Petition for Reclassifica[ion from ROtlALD K. AtJD JOAP~ H. RIRIE AtID LY!dtl E. TH0115EIJ, 710 17orth Euciid Street, ~222, Anaheim, California 92L01, a~mers, and JA11E5 L. BARISIC, ~i81~3 Lakevic:w, r~203, Yorba Linda, California 92686, agent, of certain real property situated in the City ^C A~atieim, County of Orange, State of California, described cs: Lots 27, 2o and '29 of Tract ~to. 453, as shown on a nap thereof recorded in book 17, paye 20, 11isc:ellaneous tlaps, records of said Oranye County; and 411if:REAS, the City Plannin~ Commission Jid sctiedule a public hearing at the City liall in the City oi~ Anaheim on July 6, 1977, at 1:30 p.m., notice of said public hearing haviny been duly given as required by law and in accordarice with the provisions of ihe Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.03, to hear and consider evidence for and against said proposed reclassificaCion and to investigate and make findinys and recommendations in connec[ion therewfth; said public hearing having been continued to the Planning Commission meeting of July 18, 1977; and WtiEREAS, said Commission, after due inspec[ion, inves[igation and s[udy made by itself and in its behalf, and after du~ consideraLio~ of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find and determine the following facts: 1. Tha[ the peti[ioner proposes reclassification of subject property from the RS-A-43,OJ0 (RESIDEtITIAL/AGRICULTURAL) ZOI~E to the RM-2400 (FESIDENTIAL, MULTiPLE-FAt11LY) ZOt~E. 2. That tlie Anaheim Generai Plan designates subject property for general commercial and medium-density residential land uses. 3. That [he proposed reclassification of subject property is necessary and/or desirable for the orderly and proper development nf the comraunity. 4, Tha[ the proposed reclassification of subject property does properly relate to the zones and their perr~itted uses locally establis{ied in close proximiLy to subject propcrty and to the zones and their permit[ed uses generally established throughout the community. 5, That the proposed reclassification of subject property requires the dedication and improvement of abutting streets in accor~ance with the Circulation Element of the General Plan, due to the anticipated incr~ase in traffic which will be generated by the intensification of land use. b. That n~ one indica[ed their presence at said public hearing in opposition; and Chat no correspondence was received in opposition to subJect petition. PC77-1~& E14VIR~a~~1E1',TAL IMPACT FINDItJG: That the Anatieim City Plan~in9 Comnission has reviea~ed the subjja.ci proposa to reclassify tfie zoning from Residential/Agricultural to P,esidential, riultiple-family on property consisting of 0.4 acre having a frontage of approximateiy i50 feet on the north side of La Palma Avenue, and being located approximately 89 feet west of the cen[crline of Onondaga Avenue, with waivers of minimum buil0:ng site width and minimum structurai setback, to construct three duplexes; and does grant approvai of a Ne,yative Declaration from the requirement to prepare an envaronmental impac[ rep~~rt on the basis that there would be no <.iynificant individual or cumulative aJverse environmental im~ac[ due to the approval of this Negativc Dec~aration since the Anaheim General Plan designates [he subject proper'ty for gene~al commercial ana/or medium-density residential land uses com~~ensurate with the Qroposal; [liat similar multiple-family residential pro{.erty is devcloped in the area; [hat no sensiCivic environmental impac[s are involved in the proposai; that the Ini[ial Study submitted by the petitioner indica[es no significant individual or cunzulative adverse environmental impact; and thai the Neyative Declaration substantiatiny the foregoiny findings is on fil~ in bhe City of Anaheim Pla m ing Department. NOW, THEREFC)RF., BE IT RCSOLVLD that the Anaheim City Planning Comnission does hereby yrant subject Petition for Reclassificatian and, by so doing, that Title 1$-Zoning of the Analieim Municipal Code be amended [o exclude the above-described property from the RS-A-4;,000 (RESIUEtlTIAL/AGRICULTURl1L) ZOFSE and [o incorporate said described property into the RM-2400 (RESIDEtITIAL, NULT1PLE-FAMILY) ZONE upon the following conditions rrhid~ are hereby found to be a necessary prerec;uisite to the proposed use of subject property in order to preservc [he safety and general welfare of Lhe Citizens o` [hc Ci[y of Anaheim: 1. That appropriate water assessment fees, as JetermineJ by the Dir~ctor of Public Utilities, shall be paid [o the City of Anaheim prior to tfie issuance of a building pcrmi[. 2. That stree[ lightiny facilities alony La Palma Avenue shall be installeJ as required by thc Director of Public U[ilities and in accordance with standard specifications on file in the Office of the Director af Public iJtilities; or that a bond, certificate of deposit, le[ter of credit, or cash, in an amour~t and form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim, shall be posted with the City to guarantee the installation of the abovc-mentioned requirements. 3, Tha[ the a,uner(s) of subjecc property shall pay to the City of Anaheim fhe sum of sixty (GO) cents per fron[ foot along La Palma Avenue for tree planting purposes. 4, That sidcaialks shall be installed aloi:7 La Palma Avenue as required by the City Engi~ieer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the Office of the Ci[y Engineer. That subject praperty shall be scrved by underground u[ilitfes. 6. That drainaye of subject ~roperty shall be disposed of in a manner sat(sfactory to the City Engineer. 7, In the event that subject property is to be divided for the purpase of sale~ lease or financing, a parcel map, to record the approved division of subject property, shall be submitted to and approv~d by the City of Anaheim and then be recorded in the Office of the Orange County Recorder. -2- PC77-148 8. That the owner(s) ~f su;•,;e:•r:t prope~•ty shall pay to tne City of Anaheim the appropriz~te park and recreation in-tieu fces as determined to be appropriate by the City Louncil, said fees to be paid at the tine the building nermit is issued. 9. Prior to the introduction of an ordinance rezoning subject property, Conditio~ Nos. 2 and ;, above-mr_ntioned, shall be completed. The provisions or rights granted by this resolution shall become null and void by actioR of the Planning Commission unless said conditions are complied wlth within one year fram the date hereof, or such furtlier time as the Planning Commission may grant. 10. That Conditian Nos. 4, 5 and G, above mentioned, shall be complied with prior to finai building and zoning inspections. 1977. Ttt[ FOREGOltlG RESOLUTIOt~ is signed and approved b~• me t.h;s 13th day ~of July, v ~_ r~{q FJtl;tJ, AIJAHEIM CITY P ANIJING COMMISSl011 ATTEST: f~ tQ~~ ~ /V~it~t..~,~ SE•CRETARY, Al1ANEIM CITY PLANNII!G COHMISSI011 S7A7E OF CAL I F(]Rtl l A) COUNTY OF ORA~~GE ) ss. C1TY OF AN!'diEill ) I, Edi[h L. Harris, Secretary of the Anaheim City Plannin9 Commission, do hereby certify that tiie foregoin9 resolu[ion was passed and adop[ed a[ a meeting of the Analieim City Planning Commission he1J on July 18, i~77, at 1:30 p.m., by the following vote of the rerrbers thcrcof: AYES: COM1115S10"IERS: BARNES, DAVID, KIhG, LIN!i, JOHtlSOt~ t~OC•S: G011NISSIONERS: t~OtIE ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: 70LAR AfiSENT: COMMISSIONERS: HERBST It~ WITt~ESS Wt1ERE0F, I nave ticrcu;:to se[ my ha~d this 18th day of July, 19,77. tp Q,C.Gf ~C. /P~~ SECRETARY, ANPNE111 CITY LANtlING C011ftiSSlOti -3- PC71-148