PC 77-173RESOLUTlO!! t~0. PC77-17j
A RESOLUTI0;1 OF THE AtJA{IEIt1 CITY PLA!~NIIIG COH~11557011
THAT PETITION FOR RELL~15SIFILATION t10, 77-73-1 DE GRA"IT[D
WNGREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Conmission did reccive a verified
Petition for Reclassification from TEXl1C0-AtIAliEltt Ii1LLS, IIIC., 3$0 Anah~in Hills
Road, Anaheim, California 92u07, ow~i~^r of ccrtain real property situ~~[ed in the City
of Anaheim, County of Orange, State o~ f.alifornia, described as:
.~ por[ion of land alloted to Juan Pai~lo Pcralta, Maria Jesus
Pcralt~ De Copas, anJ ttaria Peralta Oe Alvarez in the Decree of
Partition of the Rancho San[iago De Santa Ana rendereJ in Casc tlo.
11~2 and en[ered September 12, 196C in Dook "Ii" Page 410 of
Judgments of the 17th Judicial Distric[ Court of California,
included within a parcel of land bounded anei described as
be9inning at [hc intcrseciion of the Nes[crly linc of Parcel 1 of
Parcei Hap recorded in Eiook 98 Pages i( anJ 17 of Parcel 11aps in
the office of [he County Recorder of Orange Co~nty with [he
centerline of Nohl Ranch Road as sa(d cen[ertine is shown on
Record of Survey recorded in [3oak 92 Page 33 of Records of
Surveys. recorus of said County; [hcncc gencrally Southwestcriy
along thc IJestcrly boundary of said Parccl Map [hr. follow'fng
courscs:
1. South 2° 32' 17" Eas[ 127.7~ fect [o the beginning of a non-
tanyent curve cnncave Southerly having a radius of 227,00
fect, a raJial linc of said curve bears South 25° 3$' ~5"
West
2, along saiJ curvc through a central anglc of 71° 59' 05" an
arc Jistance of 2~'S.20 feet ko [he beginninn of a revcrsc
curve concave Nor[herly havin9 a radius of iis,q~ feet, a
radial linc of said revcrse curve be~rs ttorth ~~6° 21' ~0"
West
3, along said reversc curve [hrough a central angle of G9° 41'
04" an arc distance of 21.09 feet
4, South 23° 20' Crl~" 'dest 89.36 fcet
y, South t?.° 29' 05" East $0.14 fect
6, South 0° 1G' 17" Wesc 51.;0 feet
7, Soutf, to° 42' 13" 13~{.33 f~et
8. South 21° 33' 36" East 73.00 feet
9. South 33~ q9~ 33Y~ East 37,~5 feet
1~. Soutli 3° 31' 1t~" l~est 110.00 fcet '
11. South 20° 28' S9" East ~~Q6.0~ feet
12. South 6;° 55' J+1" Nest 18~,00 fee[
13, South 14° 27' S3" llest 4~,00 fcet
14, North 79° 30' 4u" West 15G,00 feet t~ the heginning of a non-
tangen[ curve concave 4lesterly I~aving a radius uf 273.00 feet
a radial line of said curvc bears t~orth 7~° 3~' 43" Wes~t
15, Southerly alony said curve [hrou~h a central angle of ~~~ 29'
53" an arc dist3~cc of 21.~+4 fcet
1G. I~ort}i 7~ 25' 33" West ~ZG.OG fcet
l7, South bt~° 53' S~" Wes2 11G.00 fcet
PC77-173
l~. South 3~ 4a' S1" .Jest ~lt~.00 feet~
thence leaviny said Parcel Nap Boundary South ~+5° 05' t;'1" 11es[
1~1~;,~0 fect; thence Souch o3° ii' 00" ~/es[ 291.0~ feet; Lhence
So~~Lh 7° 50' QO" Wesi 11~.00 fect; thence Ilorth 7~O 33' 00" ~'est
1i1,00 feet; thence South 57° 3k` 3'+" W'°.s*_ 7-21•~~ fcet; [hen,-e
Nar2h 71° SG' 21" IJesY 17h.0~ fec[; thencc ilor[h !E~° 51~' S.'-" ~~est
11~$,DO feet to the beginning of a Lanyent curve concave Southerly
hoving a radius of 1b.b~ feet, a radial linre of said wrve b~ars
;outh 49° OS' 0~" Wes[; Liiencc 1lest~~rly along said curvc throu9h a
central an~le of 90° 00' QO" an arc distance of 2~,27 feet; thencr.
South 49° Oi' D3" Ides[ 13'a•00 feet; thencc North 4n~ 5~+~ y2" West
1::y.4J+ feet; thence Somtt~ G1° 08' 47" West ~2G.~0 feet; thence
Ilorth 5`~n 00' 49" :~~:SL 111.57 feet to the Southerly prolongation
of the uesterly line of s~iJ Record of Survey; thence Nor?h 0° 3~~'
23" East alony said prolongation and said 1Jcstcrl~ linc of s~id
Record of Survey j2>.77 feec to the centeriine o~ t~ohl Rancli Road;
thence 9enerally tlor[heasterly along s~id ccn[r,Pline of 17oh1 Ranch
Roa~;i as shrown on said Reeord of Survcy thc following courses:
1, Ilorth 56° 45' i+G" Las[ G09.27 fect Co the beqinning of a
t~ingenC curve concave t~ortln~ester~y havin, a r,~.dius of G0~.00
f~~et
2. !durtheasterly along said eurve throu9h a central angle of 22°
34' ~5" ~n arc distancc of 23$.6~ fce[
3. [anycnt io said ~urvc Ilor[n 34 15' 41" East 25~.3~ fcet to
the beginninq ~of a tangent curve concave Southe~sterly having
a radius oF G00,0~ fce[
4. 11or[hcasCcri,w alon, said curec throuyh a central angic of ~~Q°
4~~ 21" an arc distCancc of ~t25,92 fect
~, tangen: to sai~i curvc Narth 74° 56' 02" East 243.3; fee[ to
the bcyinning ot' a t~ngen[ curve concave t~orth~-res[erly having
a raJ i us of fiQ~1.t~~ fce[
E, dorthcasterly along said curve through a central anyle of 25°
07' 0~" an arc distance of 271.75 fcet
7, tanyent [o s~id curve tlortli !~3° 59' 00" East GFS5.15 fcet [o
the beginni~ng of a tangen[ curve concave $or.~therly having a
radius of 6~D~.00 fce2
8, ~along said curve through ~ cen[ral anglc of 4L° 53' 07" an
arc distance of j12.8C feet
9. tangent Lo saiG curve South 37° 02' S3" East 2G2.G0 feet to
thr. beginnin~ of a tangent curve concave tlortherly having a
radius of 600.Oq feer
10. along said curve through a central angle of 10° 23' 24" an
arc distance of 109.~i feet to the point of beginniny.
tontaininy 79.36 acres; and
1lIiEREAS, the City Planning C~mmission did schedule a public hearing at the
City Hall in the Ci[y of Anaheim on July 1L, 1977, at 1:3n p.m., notice of said
public Izearing having been duly given as requireJ by law and in accordance ~aith the
provisions of tfie Anaheirn Municipal Code, Lhapter 1t3.03, to hear and consider
evlcience for and a~ainst said proposed r.^,classifica[%on ancJ to inves[igate anci make
f~ndinqs and recommendations in connec[ion [here~-tith; said public hearing having been
continuect to the Plan~i~g Camn~issio~ meer.ing of August 15, 1977; and
-z- Pc77-~73
IJHEREAS, said Commission, after du~ inspeciion, invesCiga[ion and study made
by itself and in its behalf. and aftcr duc Lo~sidcra[ion of all evidence and reports
offcred at said hearing, does f'ind and determine the follaaing facts:
1. That the petitioner proposes reclassification of subject proper[y from
the RS-A-~~3,~~0(SC) (RESID[.~TIA VAGRICULTURAL-SCE~JIC LORRIDOP. OVERLnY) ZONF. to the
RS-IIS-1(?,000(SC) (R[SIDEtJ7iAl., SII;GLE-FAMiLY IIILLSIDE-SCENIG CORRIDOP. OVERLAY) ZO~~E.
., That [he Anaheim Gencral Plan, as amended, designa[es subjec[ property
for hillside, la,~•density residential land uses.
3. Tha`, the proposed reciassification of suhjeci property is necessary and
desirable for the orderly ancf proper development of t1;e comnunity.
G. That ttie pruposed reclassification of subjec[ property does nroperly
relate to the zones and their permit[ed uses locally es[ablished in close proximity
l'o subject proper:y and to the zones and thcir ncrmiLted uscs gcncrally establiaEied
[hroughout ~he cor.~.:~nity.
5. Thai ~~~e ~roposed reclassification of subject property requires Lhe
dedication and iroprovement of abutting streets in accorc:ance with the Circulation
Elernent of the General Plan, due [o ttie anticipated increase in [raffic which will be
ycneraCed by the intensification of land usc.
6. That no one indicated [heir presence at said public hearirg in
opposition; and that no correspondence was received in opposition Co subject
petition.
EIJVIRONNENTAL IMPACT FIt1UING. Tha[ thc Anahcim Ci[y Planning C~mmission
finds that EIR No. 203 or praposed develo~ment ~f TcnCative Tract ilos. 3116, 8117,
?L02 and 93(;h, consisting of a total of 171 P,S-HS-iQ,000(SC) (Residential, Single-
Family Hillside-Scenic Lorridor Overlay) zoned lors anJ two open space lots, having
bcen considered this date by the Anahcim City Planning Commission anJ evidence, both
writien and oral, having been presen[ed [o supplenc~t said EIR No. 203, finds that
potential project-generated individual and cum~~lative adverse impacts have been
reduced to an acceptable level by conforrnance with City plans, policies and
ordinances; anJ draft EIR t~o. 203 confo n~s to the California Environmertal Quality
Act and S[atc and Ci[y EIR Guidc]incs anJ, therefore, based upon such informa[ion,
thc Anahr_im City Planning Commis~sicn docs ccrtify EI? tlo. 203.
NOW, THEREFORE, i3E IT RESC7LVED Chat the Anaheim City Planning Comr~ission
does hereby grant subject Peti[ion for Reclassification and, by so doiny, th~t Title
13-2oning of tlie Anaheim Hunicipol Code be amended to exclude the above-described
property from thc RS-A-43,000(SC) (RESIDEIITIAL/AGRICULTURAL-SCEIIIC CORRIDOR OVERLAY)
ZO!IE and to incorporate said described property into the RS-HS-10,000(SC)
(R[51DEIITINL, SINGLE-FA111LY HILLSIDE-SCEIJIC CORRIDOR OV:RLAY) ZOt~E upon the following
condltions whicli are hereby found [o be a necessary prereyuisite to the proposed use
of subject property in order [o preserve the safety and general welfare of thc
Citizens of thc C~iy of Anaheim:
1. In tfie event tfiaC subject property is to be divided for the purpose of
sale, lease or financing, a parcel map, to record the approved division of subject
property, shall be submltteJ to and approved by the City of Anafieim and then bc
recorded in the Office of [he Orangr_ County Recor~er.
-3- PC77-t73
2. That the ~er(s) of subject property shol ay Lo the Ci[y of Anahelm
Ctie appropriate park and recreation in~-lieu fees as detcrmined to be appropria;c by
the City Councll, said fces to bc paid at ttie [ime the building permit is issued,
3. That ail lots within this tract shall be served by undergrnund
utiliLies.
if, Thai a final tract map of subject property sliall be submi[ted to and
approved by the City Council and then be recorded in the Office of the Orang~ Couniy
Recorder.
5. That an ordinancc re=o~ing the suGject property shall in no event
become effectbve except upon or following the recordation of the final tract maps
wvthin [he time specified in Governmen[ Code Section 664Fi3.5 or such further time as
the advisory agency or City Council may grant.
6, Tha[ ordinances reclassifying the property shall be adopted as each
parce) is ready to comply with conditions pertairing to such parcel; provlded,
hawever, tiiat the word "parcel" shall mean presently existing parcels of record and
any parecl or parcr_ls aporoved by [hr_ City Louncil for a lot split.
i. Prior [o the introduction of an ordinance rezoning subjeci property,
Condition Nos. 1 ancl h, abovc mentioneJ, shall be completcd. The provisions or
r(~hts granted by this resolutior shall become null and void by action of Che
Plann(ng Cornmission unless said conditions are ccxnplied witli within one yea~ from the
date hereof, or such furtfier time as [he Planning Commission may grant.
8. That Condition ~lo. 3, abovc mentioned, shali bc complied with prior to
finai building and zoning inspections.
Tt1E FOREGOIt~G RESQLUTIOIi is signed and approved by mc this 15th day of
Au9us[, 1977.
~v~
CIIAIRMIIN~ AI~AHEIM CITY f'LAtII~ING COMMIS510~~
2TTEST:
S[CRE?^~=;,~M CITY pLANNI~ ISSI01~
STATE OF CF~~IfOR111A )
COUtIIY OF ORAI7GE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAf1EiM )
I, Edith L. liarris, Se~retar~i of thc Anaheim City Planning Commission, do
hereby certify that thc foregoing resolution was passcd and adopted at a mceting of
the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on August 15, 1977, at 1:30 p.m., by the
following vote of the members thereo~:
~
AYES: COM}1iSSI0NER5: EiARIlES~ DAVfD, HLRf35T, JOHNS01~, KItJG, LINt~, TOLAR
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
l1DSENT: COMMISSIOtJERS: NOt~E
I1~ NITt1E5S Ut1ERE0f, I have hereunto set my hand this 15th day of August,
~977.
~~, ~.°~Ja,~.
SECRETAitY, ANANE111 CiTY PLAt~NI;IG COMNISSION
-~+- rc77-~73