PC 77-179RLSOLUTI01! U0. PCi7-179
A RESOLUTI Ot~ OF TifE At~Al1E IM C I TY PLAtir~ I IIG COHM i SS I011
THAT PETITIOtI FOR RECLASSIFICi+TI0t1 t~0. 77-73-11 [~~ GRANTI:D
WHLREAS, the Anaheim City Plannin~ Commission did receive a verified
Petition for Recla~sification (rom WALDEEPJ B. Ai~U EtETTY C. IIAF?, iP25 Beryl Lane,
Newport Ueach, California 926G0, c.mers, and BILL Ptl[LPS, 10~5 tdorth Hain Street,
Suite S, Orange, California 92GG7, ayent, of ccrtain rea! propcrty situated in the
City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described as:
1he East 253.09 feet of tha[ portion nf the North 15 acres of the
East half of the Southeast quartcr of the Soucheast quarter of
Section 12, ToVmship 4 South, Range 11 Wes[ in the Rancho Los
Coyo[es, as shown on a Map recorded in book 51, page 11 of
tliscellaneous Maps, records of Orange County, California,
described as beginning at a point on thc East line of saiv
section, North 0° 13` '+7" West 3zo.2`) fcet from the Sout~:-_. ~~
corn~r of said section, said point being the Wor[iieast corn~- •
the South 5 acres of said East half, as sho~•~n on a map of sur. .
recorded in book 37, page 2~t of Record of Surveys in the officr: ,.:
the County Recorder of Orange County, Lalifornia; thence Sout;~~39°
!~0' 43" West 512.y~~ feet a?onq thc Idorth line of said South 5
acres to the be,inniny ~f a non-tangent curve concave
Southeasterly and havin9 a radius of 969.5~ fcet, a radial line
from said point bearing South 5%° 52' 33" East; tf~ence
Northeastcrly 304.G9 feeC alony saiJ curve to a line tangent;
Chence North y0° 07' S0" East 33G.40 fr.et along said tangen[ line
[o a linc parallcl witf~ and 53.00 feet Westcrly from the East linc
of said Section; thence Nortii 0° 13' 47" 4iest 3y.61 feet along
said paraliel line; thence North 5~° 07' S0" Fast G8,82 fee[ to
the East line of said Section; tfience Soutii 0° 1;' 47" East >zS.n6
fect to the point of beginniny. Excepting the South 200.00 feet
thereof. Also excepting that portion thereof within Magnolia
Avenue; anu
WfIEREAS, tf~e Ci[y Planning Commission ~id hold a public hearing at the Ci[y
Hali in the Lity of Analieim on AuyusC 15, 197%, at 1:30 p.m., notice of said public
hearing haviny been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the
provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Lode, Chapter i3.Oj~ to hear and consider
evidence for and against said proposed reclassification an~' to tnvestigate and make
flndings and recommendations in con~ection Cfierewith; and
WIIER[/1S, said Commission, af[er due inspection, investigation and study made
by itself and in its behalf, and after due conslderation of all evidence and reports
offered at said hearing, does find and determine the following fac[s:
1. '(hat the petitioner proposes reclassification of subject property from
the RS-A-43,000 (RESIDEI~TIAL/ACRICULTURlIL) ZONE to the RM-1200 (RESIDEt~TIAL,
11ULTIPLE-fAMILY) ZOI~E.
2. That the Anaheim General Plan designates su6ject property for medlum-
density residential land uses.
PC77-t79
3, 7hat the above-mentioned reclassification is granted subject to the
petitio~er's sCipulation that [f-~ere will be no permanent structures located within
the 5-foot public utility easement abuttiny the south property line.
i~, That clie proposed reclassifica[ion of subjec[ property is necessary
and/or desirable for the orderly and proper devr_lopment of the corununity.
5, That the proposed reclassification of subject property does properly
rel~,te to the zones and tlieir permittrd uses locally established in close proximity
to subject proper[y and [o Che tc~es and tl~eir permit[ed uses generally established
throughout the community.
G. That the propose~ reclassification of subjec[ oroperty requires [he
dedication and improvement of abutting streets in accordance with the Circulatlon
Element of the General Plan, due to tlie an[i~ipated increase in traffic +vhich will be
generated by [he intensification of lanJ use.
7. That no one indicated their presence at said public hsaring in
opposition; and tha[ no correspondence was received in opposition to subject
petition.
EtIVIROFIMEilTAL IMPACT FINDI~IG: That the Anaheim City Planning Commission has
reviewed the subject proposa to reclassify the zoniny from RS-A-43,000
(RESIDEIITIAL/AGRICULTURAL) to Rla-120~ (RESIDEtJTIAL, MULTIPLE-FAMILY) on approximately
0.7 acre having a frontage of approximately 2i+2 fcet on the west side of Magnolia
Avenue, having a maximum depth of approxima[cly 200 feet, and being located
approxirnately 525 fcet north of [he centerline of Lincoln Avenuc, and does hersby
approve the IJe9ative Declaration from [he requirement to prepare an environmental
impact report on the basis that tl~ere woul~ be no si9nificant individual or
cumulative adverse environmc:ntal impact due to the approval of this t7egative
Declaration since the Anaheim General Plan desiynates the subject property for
medi::m-density residential land uses com~~cnsuratc wi[h the proposat; that no
sensitive environmental impacts are involved in ihe proposal; that the Initial Study
subniitteJ by ihe petikioner indicates no significant individual or cumulative adverse
environmen[al impacts; and that the Negative Declaration su65tantiating [he foregoing
findings is on file in the City of Anaheim Planniny Department.
tJC1J, T{iEREfORE, IiE IT R[SOLVEU that the Anaheim City Planning Commission
does hereby grant subject PetitiQn for Reclassifica[ion and, by so doing, that Title
18-Zoning of ttie Anaheim Municipal Code be amended to exclude the above-described
property from tiie RS-A-43,OOG (RESIQEt~TIAL/HGRICUITURAL) ZONE and to incorporate said
described property into the RM-1200 (RESIUEIITIAL, MULTIPLE-FNiILY) ZONE upon the
following r.onditions which are hereby found [o be a necessary prerequisite L'o the
proposed use of subject proper[y in order to preserve the safety and yeneral welfare
of the Citizens of the Lity of Anaheim:
1. That all engineering requirements of ttie City of Anaheim along Magnolia
Avenue~ including preparation of improvcment plans and installa[fon of all
improvements such as curbs and gutters, sidewalks, street grading and paving,
drainage facllities or otiier appurtenant work, shall be cc>mplied with as required by
the City Enyineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in
the Office of the City Engineer; that streaY lightiny facilities along Magnolia
Avenue shall bc installed as required by tlie Director af Public Utilities, and in
accordance with standarci specifications on file in the Office of the Director of
Pubtic Utilities; and/or that a bond, certificate of deposit, letter of credit, or
-2- PC77-t79
cash, in an amount and form satisfac[ory to Che City of Anahcim shall be posted with
thc City to guarantec the installation of the above-men[ioned requirements.
2. Tha[ the owner(s) of sub;:~ct property shall pay to the City of Anaheim
the sum oT sixty cents (GOC) pcr front foot alang Magnolia Avenuc for tree planting
purposes.
3. Tnat trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved
plans on file with the Office of the Uirector of Public ~lorl:s.
4, That `ire hydrants shall be installed and chargcd, as required and
determined ta be necessary by the Cfiief of the Fire Department, prior to commentement
of s[ructural framing.
5. That subject property shall be served by under9round utilities.
6. That drainage of subject prope~ty shall be disposed of in a manncr
sa[isfactory to the City Engineer.
7, That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay to tfie City of Anaheim
the appropriate park and recreation in-lieu fees as deternined to be appropriate by
the City Council, said fees [o be paid at the time the buildin~ permit is issued.
~, That appropriatc wa[er ~ssessment fees, as determined by ttie Director
of Public Utilities, shall be paid [o [he Ci!y of Anaheirn prior to the issuance of a
building pennit.
9. That a six (6) fooL' high masonry wall shall be constructed along the
south and west property lines.
10. That the owner(s) of subject property sf~all de~d [o [he City of Anahedm
a five (5) foot public utility easemcnL alony the south boundary of subject property.
11, That subjecC property shall be developed substan[ial!y in accordance
with plans and specifications on file ~~ith [fie City of Anaheim marked Exhibit tdos. 1
through 3.
12, Prior Co thc introduc[ion of an ordinance rezoniny subject property,
Condition Nos. 1, 2 and 1Q, above men[ioned, shall be completeJ. The provisions or
rights granted by [his resol~~~~on shall becorne null and void by action of the
Planning Commission unless said conditions are complied with within one year from the
date hereof, or sucli further time as the Planniny Cormzissiun may grant.
13, That Condition tlos. 3, 5, ~. 9 and 11, above mentioned, shall be
complied with prior to finaf builuing and zonin9 inspections.
T11[ FOREG011~lG RESOLUTIOt~ is siyned and approved by me this 15th day of
August, 1977.
:HAI P:, Atl HEIN ~1TPL:NN NG OMM SS ON
ATTEST:
~~~ ~ ~~ MMISSION
~ PC77-t79
-3-
r i
STATE OF LALIFORIIIA )
COUt~TY OF ORANG[ ) ss.
CITY Of At1ANElr1 )
I, Edith l. Ilarris, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Cortmission, do
hereby certify tha[ the forcyoiny resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of
the Anaheim Ci[y Pianning Commission held on August 15, 1977, at 1:30 p.m., by the
followiny vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMNISSIOIVERS: BARPlES, DAV(D, IIERE3ST, JONNSON, KING~ LIlIN, TOLAR
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NOUE
AEiSE1JT: COMMISSIONERS: NOitE
1977.
II~ 111TIIESS Wf1ERE0F, I have hcreunto sct my hand this 15th day of August,
~~ ~° %~.~..
SECRETARY, ANAHEiIt CITY PLANNI;~G COMMISSI01!
~4- PC7~-179