PC 77-247RESOLUTION N0. PC77-21+7
A RESOLUTIO!! Of TIiE AN~:~EIM CITY PLA.tJt~II~G COIINISSIOt~
TNAT PETITIOId fOR RECLAS~IFILATIOtJ N0. 77-7~'?`+ BE DENIEU
WHEkEAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission did receive a verified
Petition for aeclassificatic;~i 'r.-~,. FERDINAN~ AtiU MIRIAt~A FERIt7U, 7U5 So~~th State
Coliege Boulevard, Anaheim, Califor~ia y2`Oti, owners of certain real propety situated
in the City of Anaheim, County of Uranqe, State of California, described as:
Lot 115 0.` Tract 220~,, as F~er map recorded in Book 64, Pages 13 to
35 inclusive of Miscella~eoux Idaps, in the office of the county
recorder of said Orange County; and
UHEREAS, the City Planni~og Commission did hold a public hearing at the Ci*_y
Hall in the City of Anah~im on t;ova:rciber ~I, 1977, at 1:3~ P•m„ notice of said public
hearing havin9 been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the
provisions of the Anaheim I~funici~~al Code, Chapter 13.03, to hear and consider
evidence for and against said proposed reclassification and to investicate and make
findings and recommentiations in connec[ion therewith; and
WHEREhS, saiJ Conmission, after due inspection, investi9ation and study made
by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reporis
offered at said hcaring, do~s finci and detennine the following facts:
1, That the petitioner proposes reclassification of suLject property frorn
the RS-%200 (RESIDEIlTIAL, SINGLE-FlU11LY) ZOEJE to the CL (COMMERCIAL, L1111TED) "LONE.
2, That the Anaheim General Plan desiynates sub;ect property for
commercial/profr_ssional land uses.
3. That the proposed reclassification is hereby denied on the basis that:
approval o-~ould not be co~sistent with [he A~af~eim General Plan and could be
considered as spa[ zoniny, allowing general commercial uses in an area dseignated for
more restrictive professional and office commercial uses by the General Plan, and
that the existiny residential and accessory commercial uses can continue in
connection wit{i the issuance of a home occupation permit.
4, That the proposed reclassifica[ion of subject property is not nece.ssary
and/or desirable for the orderly and proper development of thc community.
5, That the p~oposed reclassification of subject property does not
properly relate to the zones anJ their permitted uses locally established in close
proxianity to subjcct property and to [he zones and their permitted uses generally
established throughout the community.
6, That no one inciicated their presence at sald public hearing in
opposition; and tliat no correspundence was received i~ opposition to subject
petition.
PC77-247
EPIVIRONMEt~TAL IhfPACT FINDING: That the Anahei•m City Planning Cortmission has
reviewed the subject proposa to rec assify the zoning 'f'rem RS-72~0 (Residential,
Single-Family) to CL (Comm~rcial, Limited} on approximat~°1y 7~00 square feet located
a[ the southwest corner of Savoy Avenue and State~ iCollege Doulevard, having
appror.imate frontages of 102 feet on *_he south side o'f 'Savoy Avenue and 97 fee: on
the west side of S[ate College 8oulevard; and does herelbx approve the Negative
Declaration from Che requirement to prepare an enviiranmentai impact report on Che
basis that there would be no sir,nificant individual or cumulative adverse
environmental impact due [o the approval of this tlegative Declaration since the
Anaheim General Plan designates the subject property for commercial/professional land
uses commensurate with tlie proposal; that no sensi[ive environmental lmpacts are
involved ir. thc proposal; that the Initial Study subnitted by the petitioner
indicates no significant individual or cumulative adverse environmental impacts; a~d
that ttie Negative Declarat;on substantiating the foregoing findings is on file in thc
City of Anaheim Planning Department.
NO'.J, THEREfORE, ~E IT RESOLVED [hat the Anaheirn City Planning Commission
does hereby deny subject Petition for Reclassification on the basis of [he foregoing
findings.
T11E FO~EGOING RE50LUTIOt~ is signed and approved by me this 7th day of
November, 1977.
i~~PO~/ ~s-~
CtiATRHAt7, ANkN~1' C I~Y IANN I NG COMM I SS ~Ot~
ATTE57:
`~~.~ ,~' ~~-
SECRETARY~ AIIAfiEIM CITY PLFNNING COMI115S10~1
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUfI'fY OF OftA~IfE ) ~s.
CITY OF AldAIiEIM }
I, Edi[h L. Narris, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopced at a meeting of
the Anaheim City Planning Cortmission held on t~ovember 7, l977, at 1;30 p.m., by the
foltowing vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COM1115510;~ER5: DAVIU, fIERBST, JOHNSON, KI~IG, TOLAR
NOES: C011M15SIOt7ER5: IJONE
ABStNT: COt1t115SI0;~EP,S: DARtlES, Llt~ti
~377.
It~ WITtI[SS 4111EREOF, i have hereunto set rrry hand th~s 7~h day of November,
`~.~~ .r.° ~.~,~.~..
SL•CRETAP,Y, AWAHEIM LITY PLAtJNING C011MISSION
-2- PC77-247