PC 77-50e,~so~~s7~or~ ~io. Pc77-5o
A~ESUL'R1T I fJN QF 'TH,C AhlAHE 1 M C 17Y PLA~di~ I NG CO'1~t I SS I c!N
TNAT PET(TI'ON FOR VARIAtJ~E P;O. 2909 BE DENIED,
~WH£R~AS, Lhe Anaheim City Nlan~ing C~anmission did receive a verified
Petdtion fcr Varianee from KIt~G W, VIOOR, L301 E. Florence Avenue, Downey, California
90240 (Owner) artc! RO[3ERT A. AHLSTEDT, 2~.5~ E. Cc.asi Highway, Corona Del .Mar,
Caiifornla 92b25 '{~~Ent) of certain real property situa[ed in the City of Ana~helm,
County of Orange, State of Califo~'nia described ~s:
The l~orth 190 fe~et of the Ea5[ 21~ feei of the ~~ortheast quar[er of [he Nort'i~esst
quar[er of the S~uthwest quarter Df Secti!~n ~7, in Township 4 South, Range f~
Nest, in [he Rancho San Juan CaJo~ de Santa pna and ihe Rancho Las Bofsa~s, as
shown on a map thereof recorded in ,4~ook yl, ~agr. 10, Miscellaneous Haps, recorCs
of said Orange Councy.
NHEREAS, the City Planning Commiss'ion dId hold a publlc heari~g at thc City
Ha11 in the Ciiy of Anaheim on February 28, 1477, at 1:30 p.m., notice of said public
hearing havin9 been duly given as requlrrd by law and in accordance a+ith the
provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Lhapter 18,03, to he,~r and consider
nvidence for and against said propased varlance anJ ta inves[ir~ate and make f(ndings
and recommendations i~ connection thrrewith; and
NHEREAS, satd Co.mnlssian, after due inspection, invesCigation and study made
b~ its~lf and in its beh~l'f, and after due consideration of all evide~ce and rr_ports
af~ered at said hearin9, does flnd and determine the foilowing facts:
1. That the pe~tt[ioner proposes the follo~aing waiver from the Anaheim
Municipal Code to estaolish sn automoblle diagnostic and service C~h~C~ in the CL
(COHHERCIAL, ~:.INITED) ZONE:
SECTIOP! 13.4~f.020 - Permitted uses. (automobile citagnostic
and servlce center not perm~tted)
2. That the above-mentioned waiver is hereby denie~i on the basis that the
pro~osab constitutes t~•ro primary uses on a serv~ce station site and aoprova) of said
waiver would set an undesirable pre~cden[ ~For future slmilar requests f~or the Joint
use ot ser^~'ice station sites for two sep.~rate businesses; that no site or buildinq
improvements are proposed as have hcen required in connection with tonversion
deYelopment at service station sites; and, furChermqr~e, t'he petitloner did not
demonstratc that a hardship ~dould be treared if said rra~v~r wr.re not granted.
3. Tha[ there are no exceptiqna) or extraordinary circurnstances or
~conuitions applicabie to [he property lnvolved or to Che int~nded use of [he aroperty
that Jo ~o[ apply generally to the propcrty or class of usc in thr. same vicinity and
zone.
4. That t'r+e requested variance ts noe necessary for the prescrvation and
enjoyment of a subwtantial property rlght possessed by other property tn the same
vicinity and zone, and denied to the prop~r[y in question.
5. Tha~ tF~e requested variance will be maCeriaily detrimental to the
public welfare or inJurie_: *_o t!:e property or lmprovements 1n such vicinity and zone
in whtch the property is located.
RESOLUTIOti N0. PC77-50
6. That n~ one indi~ated their prc~ence at said p~bli~ hearing in
opposltion; and YhaC no correspondence was received in oppasition L~ the subjerc
~eiition,
Et~VIRONHENTAL IMPAC7 FIpIDING: 7hat the Dlrer.tor of thc °lan~irg D2partment
has determined that the proposed activity fa1ls within the defi~~l¢ion of Section
3.01, Class 1, of the Lity of Anahe~m Guidr.iin~4 Co the Requirements for an
Environmentai Impact Report a~d is, there~or•e; categ~ricail~y exemot from the
requirement tc file an EIR.
iJOW, THEREFOR[, B~ IT 1tE50!.VEh that the A~aheim City Pianning Commission
does hereuy deny subject Petition for Variance ~n the •ti~asls of the aforementiorsed
findings.
TNE FOREG09NG RESOLU'71GN
February, i977.
nT7ES•r:
~ />
( a~7`i,~.~.u~xJ.G ~ ~--~~a-rJ
SECRETARY, ANANEIM CITY PIANNINr, GOMF1155101~
STATE OF CALlFOR!JIA )
COUI~TY QF OF(ANGE )ss.
CITY OF A~1~HEIM )
I, Patricia B. Scanlan, Secrecary of [he Anaheim tlty Planning Commission,
do hereby certify thaC the fc~r~going resolution was passed and adopeed ~t a meetina
of the Anaheim City Plannin9 Ldmmisslon, held on February 2Q, 1977. at 1:30 P•m „ by
the f~llowing vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COHMISSIONERS: DAVID, HERBS~. KiPJG, MORLEY~ TOLAR, JOti1~SON
~10E5: CONt115510NER5: tJONE
ASSENT: LOtiMI5510NER5: BARNES
~917.
iN WIT~JESS WHEREOF~ I have hereunto set my hand this 23th day of february,
( ~"a~.u,.c~.,~~~a-~r~l~irJ
SECRETARY, ANANEIM CITY PLAt~IJING LOMNISSIO~I
(s sigRed and approve~ b me this 28th day of
~~
CNA I RMAN ANAH~ I M I TY LAtlt! t IJG COMM f SS 10f!
_2_ P.ESOLUT I ON tJO. PC77-SO