PC 77-68RESOLUTION N0. PC77-68
A RESOI.UTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANMING COHNISSION
TNAT PETITION FOR COND6TIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 1G94 BE GRANTED.
4lHEREAS, the Anahelm C(ty Planning Commtssion did receive a verlfied
Pe[ition for Conditlonal ilse Permit from DUNN BUSINESS PtiRKS, 28 Brookhallow Drive,
Santa Ana, Callfornla 92705 (Owner) of certain real property sltuated In the City of
Anaheim~ County of Orange, State of California described as:
PARCEI t, iN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN
ON A PARLEL MAP FILED !N BOOK 79 PAGE b5 OF PARCEL MAPS, iN 7HE OFFICE OF THE
COUNTY RECORDER OF SAlD COUNTY.
NHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a publfc hearing at the Clty
Hall In the City of Anahelm on March 14, 1977, a[ 1:30 p.m., no[ice of safd public
hearing having been duly given as require~ by laa and fn accordance wlth the
provisions of the Anaheim Muntcipal Lodc, Chaptcr 19.03, to hear and consider
evidence for and agalnsY sald proposad condltlonal use and to investigate and make
findfngs and recomnendatlons In connectl~n therewi[h~ and
WHEREAS~ safd Commisslon, after ~ue Inspectlon, inv-:stigat(on and study made
by Itself and in its behalf, and after due consideratlon of ail evidence and reports
offered at safd hear•ing, does find and determine the following facis:
1. That the proposed use Is properly one for which a conditlonal use
permlt 15 authorized by the Anahelm Municlpal Code Section 18.44.OSU.160, *.o wit:
permlt a motel.
2. That the proposal Is granted for a 50-unlt motel and manager's unit,
and that the petltioner stlpulated to submitting revised plans ln conformance wlth
Code standards to the Planning Department for review and approval, prior to the
Issuance o` a building permit.
3. That thc petltio~er sttpulated that a maxlmum of 6 rental unlts (12$ of
the total number of motel ren[al un;ts) wlll have kftchencttes.
4. That the petitlaner stlpulated that the Intent of the proposal does not
include a coffee shop or restaurant In connectlon wlth the motel units.
5, That the proposed use wlll not adverscl~ affect the adJoir.ing land uses
and the growth and devetopment of the area ln which it is proposed ta be located.
6. That the sfze and shape of the slt.. proposed for the u,e ts adequate to
allow the full dcvelopmnn[ of the proposed use In a manner not detrimental to the
particular area nor to the peace, health, safety, and general welfare of the Citlzens
of the City of Anaheim.
7. That the granting of the Condltional Use Permit under [he conditions
imposed w111 not be detrimental ea thF peace, health~ sa`ety ard general
welfare of the LltlaeRS of the Clty of A~iaheim.
8. That no one indlcated thelr presence at sald pubilc. hearing In
opposltion; and that no correspondence was received ln oppesitlon to :he subJect
petitlon.
RESOLUTION N0. PC77-68
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPAC7 FINDING: That the Anahelm Ctty Planning Cortmission has
revlewed the sub ect proposa cons sting of a 50-unlt motel and manayer's uni[ on
approximately 1.2 acres located on the north side of La Palma Avenue, approximately
180 feet ~rest of [he centerline nf koodland Drlve, and does hereby recommend to the
City Council of the Clty of Anahelm that a Negative DeclaraCion from the requlrement
ta prepare an envirormEnta) fmpact report be approved for sald p~oJr.c*. on the basis
that ~here would be no significant lndlvidual or cumulatlve od~erse i~rpacts on the
envlronment due to the approval of this Negative Declaratlon ~s evldrRC.r: by prfor
environmentel impact reports and ralated informatlon preVlr,~i~~ conside~-ed by this
bady for the subJect property and, addltlonally, the Inltta! St~~+±y ~i: Enolronmental
Impac[ submitted by the aFplicant lndicates no significant adverse environmental
Impacts; and that the Negative Declaratlon subsf.an[lat(ng the forego(ng flndings ts
on flle In the Office of [he Planning Department at City Hall.
NOW, THEREFORE~ BE IT RESOLVED that the Anahelm City Plann(ng Commisston
does hereby grant subJect Patitlon for Conditlonal Use Permlt, upon the following
condltlons which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisfte to [h~ proposed use
of the subJect property ln order to preserve the safe[y and general welfare of the
Citlzens of the Gtty of Anahe(m:
1. That this Condi[lonai Use Permlt is granted subJect to the completion
of Reclasslficatlon No. 73-74-55, now pending.
2. That revlsed ptans shall be submttted [o the Planning Dcpartment for
revlew and approval prior to the issuance of a bulidlny permiY, said plans to show a
50-unit motel and a manager's unit In conformance with Code standards and a maximum
of 6 rental units (12$ of the total number of ren[al units) to tnclude kitchen
efficlency units wl[h a maximum of 6-cub(c foot rafrlgerators, two-burner stoyes
(excluding oven and beking Pacilittts), and single-com~nrtment sinks, except tha[ the
manager's unit yli) be allowed co have full kitchen facllltles and, fur[hermore, that
a coffee shop or restaurant shall not be Included as aart of the development, as
s[ipulated to by the petltloner,
3. That the property owner(s) shall pay far the fnsYalla[ton of traff(c
signallzatlon at the (ntersection of koodland Drive and La Palma Avenue, sa(d paymen[
estlmated to be 540,000 with the exact amount to be de[ermined by the Treffir
Engtneer at the tlme of payment, as stlpulated [o I~y the petltloner, If other
properties in the surround(ng commerclal-industri~ei complex develop In connectfon
Nlth approved zoning petttlons (conditlonal use permiQS or varlancesi, the cost of
signaltzatlon may be apporeloned as determined 2o be approprfate by the Traffic
Engineer and be charged to sald pctitloners wlth relmbursement to the subJect
petltloner.
4. That Conditlon Nos, t and
prfor fo the commencement of the acttvlty
to the time that the bullding permlt Is
from date hereof~ whichcver occurs first,
Commissfon and/or Cicy Councll may grant.
3, above-rnentloned, shall be complied wlth
authorized undtr thfs resolutlon~ ar prior
Issued~ or wtthin e perlod of one (t) year
or such further time as the Planning
-2- RESOLU710N N0. PC?7°4$
THE FOREG0IHG RESOLUTION Is signed and approv by me thls 14th day of
March~ 1977.
CHAIRNAN A EIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
5 C E A RO EM ~
ANAHEIM LITY PLAkNING COMMISSIOk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE )ss.
CITY OF ANAl1EIM )
i, Pamela H. Santala, Secretary Pro Tempore of the Anaheim City Planning
Comnission, do hereby certify that the foregotng resolutlon was passed and adopted at
a meeting of the Anahetm CICy Planning Commisslon~ held on March 14, 1977, at 1:30
p.m., by the following vote of the members tfiercof:
AYES: COMMI55lONERS: BARNES~ OAVlD~ HERBST~ MORLEY, TOLAR, JOHNSON
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: MONE
A9SENT: COMHISSIONERS: KING
IN WITNESS WHEREOf, i have hnreunto set my hand this 14th day of March~ i}77
ECRE R PRO EM ~R~I
ANAHEIM CITY PLA~dNlNG COHMISSION
-3- RESOLUTION N0. PC77-68