PC 77-70RESOLUTION N0. PC77-70
A RESOLUTION fic TtiE ANAHEIn C17Y PLANNIt~r, LOnMI5510r~
TNAT PETITI~Pi FOR VARIANCE N0. 2~G7 BE GRANTEL', IN PART
WHEREAS, [ne A~~ahetm City Planniny Commission dId recelve a verified
Petition for Variance from 11111STOf1 J. AtID VELMA J. GEIGER, 3i4; Locust Avenue, l.ong
Be3ch, CA 90d07 (Q~~ners) of certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim,
County of Orange, State of Lalifornia, descrihed as:
Lot 12 af Trac[ No. J43, as recorded in Bk. 22, Page 10 of
Miscellaneous Maps, records of Orange Coun[y; and
NIfEREAS, the City Planniny Comnissiun did scfiedule a public hearing at the
City Mall in the City of Anaheir~ on November "d, 1377, at 1:30 p,m., n~t(ce of said
pubiic hearfng having bcen duly given as required by law and in accordance with the
Nr~~vision, of the Anaheim Municipal Lode, Chapter i8.n3, [o hear and consider
evidenc~ for and agalnsc sa3d proposed variance and to investigate and make findl~gs
and recommendations in connection therewi[h; safd publ(c hearing having been
con;inued to 2he Planning Lommissfon meeting of March 28, 1977; and
4/HEREAS, sald Commission, af[er duc inspection, inves[fgatfon and study made
by ttself and In its behalf, anJ after due consideration of all evidence and reports
offered at sald hear(ng, does find and determinc the followir.~j `~cts:
1. That the peti[ioner proposcs the followin~ walvers from the Anahe(m
Municipal Code~ to construc[ a 20-unit, twa-story apartmen[ complex:
a. SECTiO~ 18.34.OG2.012 - Maximum hu(ld(ng height.
1 story permitted; 2 stories proposed)
b. SECTI01~ 18.34,OG~.011 - Minimum distante between bullJings.
2. That Walver 1-a, above-mentloned, ls hereby ~ranted for an i(3-unit
apartment cornplex on the basis that although the subJect property is located entfrely
withln 150 feet of RS-A-li3,000 (Residentlal/Agricuitural) zoned property, i[ abu[s
parcels zoned RM-120~ to the east an~ wea[ which had welvers of ineximum build(ng
helght apprnved by the City Council, said parcels separa[(ng [he subJect property
from RS-A-43,Oq0 parcels.
3• That Nafver 1-b, above-rtr_ntfoned, was deleted by revlsed plans and 1s
no longer necessary.
4. That Lhere are exceptional or extraordinary cfrcumstances or condl[Ions
applicabie to the property invoiveJ or to the intended use, as granted, of the
proper~y that do not apply 9enerally to the property or class of use in the same
vicinl[y and tone.
RESOLUTION ~~0. PC77-70
5. That the requested variance, as gra~ted, is necessary for the
preservation and enjoyment o` a subs[antial property right possessed by other
ptoperty in the same vicinity and zone, and denied to Lhe property in question.
6. That the requested variance, as granted, wili rot be ma[erially
detrlmental to the publlc welfare or inji~r(o~s [o cfie property or improvements in
such vlcinity anJ zone in which the property is located.
7. Tha[, althouyh no onc was presenc at the public hzaring in opposition,
one person was prescnt earlicr (n the mee[ing and lcft a Ifst of objections [o the
proposal for consideration; and [hat no correspondence was received in opposi[iun ~o
Che subjec[ pet(tion,
ENVIRONME~~TAL IMPACT FIt~~II~G: Thac thc Anaheim City Pianning Commission has
reviewcd t e propose proje~t, cons sting of an lE-unit, [wo-s[ory apartment complex
with a walver of [he maximum buildiny hcigh[, on approxlmateiy 0.8 acre on thc north
side of Savanna Stre~t approximately 19G fcet west of Knot[ Street, and does hereby
recommend to [he Lity Countil of tt~c Llty of Anaheim [ha[ a Negatfve Declara[ion from
the requircmenc [o prepare a., environrnr_ntal (mpact report be approved for [his
proJect on the basis th~t :here Woulel be no slynificant indivfdual or c~mulative
adverse impac[ on the envirflnr,~nt due [o [he approval of this Nega[ive Declaratfon,
since [he subject properiy is abutteel on the east and wes[ hy two-sCOry apartment
buildinys, and the In)[ial S[udy submi[ted by the pe[itioner indicates no significant
adverse environmental impac[; and that the Negative Declara[ion substaniia[ing the
foregoing findings (s on filc tn tiie Officc of che Planniny Depar[menc a[ Ci[y tiall.
NON, THEREFORE, DL IT RESOLVEU rhac tlic Anahcim Lity Planning Comnisslon
does hereby grant, in part, subject Petl[ion for Variance, upon [he f~llowing
condltlons which are hereby founJ to be a necessary prerequisite to [he proposed use
of thc subject property in orJcr [o preserve thc safety and general welfare of the
Litlzens of the Ci[y of Anah~irt,:
i. Tha[ thls Variance is grantnd subJect to [he completion of
Reclassification No. 7G-7%-22, now pending.
2. Tha: subjec[ property shall be developed subs[an[ially in accordance
wlth plans and specif;catfons on file wi[h the City of Anahelm marked Revision No. 1
of Exh i b 1 c 1~os . i th rougfi y,
TIiE FOREGOING RESOLUTIOt~ fs signed and approved by me this 28th day of
March, 1977,
, ~~v ~
CHAIR N R M 0 E
ANAHtIM CITY PLANNINC COMHISSION
'2' RESOLUTION N0. PC77-70
ATTE57:
~~~~~-~_~~-~
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLAkNING COMMISSION
STATE Of CALIFOiiNlk )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIN )
I, Patrlcia B. Scanlan, Secretary of the Anaheim Lity P1annln9 Commisslon,
do hcreby cer[Ify [hat [he foreyolny resolution was pessed and adopted a[ a mceting
of the Anahelm Cfty Planning Commission held on M~rch 28, 1977, at 1:30 p.m., by the
following vote of the members thcreof:
AYES: GOMMISSIONERS: BARt1E5, DAVIU, HEREiST, KItJG, MORLfY, TOLAR
NOES: COHMISSIONEkS: NONE
AfiSEt~T: COMHISSIONERS: JOtit~50N
IP~ NITNE55 41t1ERE0F, I have hereunto set my hand this 28ch day of March,
~ 1977.
. • r~r~
SECRETAR , t~ H IM I L~.NNING COMYISSION
~~
~q
f
-j- RE50lUT4~'i" NC?. PC77-70
- _ ____-"~