Loading...
General (2)Jennifer L. Hall From: Debbie Trabattoni < Sent: Monday, January 10, 2022 4:14 PM To: Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Jose Diaz; Gloria S. Ma'ae; Avelino Valencia III; Trevor O'Neil; Jose Moreno; Stephen Faesse) Cc: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] HCD Notice of Violation re: CUP for Grandma's House of Hope Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Dear Mayor Sidhu and Councilmembers: The Housing and Community Development (HCD) letter to the City of Anaheim dated December 14, 2020, regarding a "Notice of Violation" relative to the denial of a CUP for Grandma's House of Hope is confusing to me and many of my neighbors. If accurate, the letter details embarrassing incompetence by the City of Anaheim for 15 years and creates more questions, including: 1- Does the City believe the HCD letter to be valid or is it an overreach of HCD's authority? 2- If the HCD letter is believed valid, who on staff are responsible to know these issues and make reliable recommendations to the Planning Commission and City Council? 3- If staff is as misinformed as HCD states, how can the staff recommendation to the Council regarding a response to the letter be trusted? 4- How have other cities interpreted and implemented the law regarding transitional and supportive housing? 5- How many "illegal" supportive and transitional housing CUPS have been approved and denied in the last 15 years? Are all past CUPS for transitional housing now null and void? 6- What was the taxpayer cost to process this specific CUP for the city? What about all the other supposedly invalid CUPS over the years? HCD's letter states (Pg 2, Paragraph 3), "...This does not mean that transitional and supportive housing must be allowed by right in all residential neighborhoods." And yet, HCD's entire letter outlines how supportive and transitional housing IS allowed by right in single family neighborhoods. How does the City plan to resolve this apparent inconsistency? Anaheim has arguably done more for homeless and disadvantaged communities than any other similar sized city. This includes: 1) Section 8 Low Income Rental Units (more per capita than other cities); 2) two Homeless Shelters within the City; 3) saturation of our neighborhoods with group homes; and 4) the total number of affordable housing units per capita. Unfortunately, these programs tend to be concentrated in selected areas of the city. This subject deserves clarity and a full community -wide discussion. There may be a substantial cost to the City to resolve these conflicting and confusing policy objectives. However, doing nothing will cost more in the long run. I urge you to fight back. Debra Trabattoni Daly Anaheim, CA 92805