PC 79-140;
RESOLUTION N0. PC79-140
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIH GITY PLAtINI1IG CONMISSIOt~
THAT PETITION FOR CO!!^~TIO~IAL USE FERNIT N0. 1997 BE GftAHTED
WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Crxranission did receive a verified
Petition for Conditional Use Permit from L. DARLE HALE, ROBERT R. ALLEN, HOWRRD H.
HUNGERFORD AND FLORENCE 1. HUNGERFORD, 3910 EasC Loronado Street, Anahelm, California
92807, owncrs of certain real propcrty situated in the City of Anaheim, County of
Orange, Sta[e of Californ(a, described as:
That portion of thc Northwest quarter of Section 4. Township 4
South, Range 9 West. of the San Bernardino Meridian, Parcei 6 as
shown on a map filed in book 131. page 25 of Parcel Maps in the
office of the County Recorder of Orange County, Lalifornia.
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City
Hall In the Ctty of Anaheim on July 2, 1979. at 1:30 p.m., notice of saTd publfc
hearin9 having bee~ duly given as required by laN and in accordance With the
provEsions of the A~aheim M~nicipal Code. Chaoter 18.03. to hear and conslder
evidence for and against said proposed conditional use and io investigate and make
findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and
WH~REAS, said Commission~ af[er duc inspection, investigation and study made
by itself and in its behalf~ and after due consideration of all ev(dence a~d reports
offered at said hearfng, does find and determine the following facts:
1. That [he proposed use is properly one for which a condTtlonal use
permit is authorized by Anaheim Huniclpal Code Section 1E.61.050.360 to wit: [o
permit a~+~tvate rac~uet6all facility in the ML (lndustrlai. LimTted) Zone.
2. That the proposed use will not adversely affect the adJoining land uses
and the growth and development of the area in whtch it is proposed to be located.
3. That the size and shape of the site proposed for the use is adequate to
allow the full development of the proposed use fn a manner not detrlmental to the
particular area nor to the peace. health, safety, and general welfare of the Cittzens
of the City of Anaheim.
4. That the granttng of [he Condittonal Use Permit under the conditions
imposed, if any. wTll not be detrimental to the peace, health, safety and genera9
welfare of the Cttizens of the Ctty of Anaheim.
5. That the traffic generated by the proposed use w(il not impose an undue
burden upon the streets and highways desig~ed and improved Lo carry che traffic in
thc area.
PC~9-140
6. Thai no one Indicated their presence at sald publlc hearing in
opposition; and that no correspondence was received in oppositlon to the subJect
petition.
EI~VIRONMENTAL IMPACT FitIDING: That the Anaheim City Plannin9 Crnmisstor has
reviewed the proposa to permtt a private racquetball facility on a rectangularly-
shaped parcet of land consisting of approxima[ely 1.5 acres, having a frontage of
approximately 207 feet on the south side of Coronado 5[rcet, having a maxtmum depth
of approximatcly 315 feet, and beln9 located approxtmately 71b feet west of thc
centerline of Van Buren Street; and docs hcreby approve [he Negativc DeclaratTon
from the requirement to prepare an environmental impact report on the basis that
there would be no significant individual er cumulative adverse envtronmental impact
due to the approval of this Negative Declaration since the Anaheim feneral Plan
designates the subject property for general industrtal land uses cortmensurate with
the proposal; that no sensitivic environmcn[al impacts are involved in the proposal;
that the Initial Study submitted by thc petitioncr indandLetha[~ the9Negative
individual or cumulative adverse environnental impacts;
Declaration substantia[in9 [he foregoing findings is on file in the City of Anaheim
P1anning Depar;ment.
NOW, TFfEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED thac the Anahcln Lity Plannina Comnlssion
does hereby grant subJect Peticton for CortAitlonal Use Permit, unon Che followin9
conditions rihich are hereby found to be a necessary prerequtstte to the proposed use
of the subjcct property in ordcr to preserve chc safety and general welfare o` thc
CitEzens of the City of Anahetm:
i, Tha2 subject property shall be developed suhstantially in accordance
with plans and spectflcatlons on file with the City of Anat~elm r~arked Exhibit Nos. 1
and 2.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Anahcim City Planning Com~ission does hereby
find and deterrnine [hsL adopitort of t~is Recolutien is expressly predicated upon
applicant's canpiiance Nith each and all of the condlitons hereinabove set fort~.
ShoulJ any such condicion, or any part thereof, be dsclared invalld or unenrorceable
by tha finai judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resalution.
and a~y approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void.
TIIE FOREGOING RESOLUT~Ot1 is signcd and approved by mc this 2nd day of July,
~979. .
I HAtI. ANAff tt I TY LA~741NG CO!!M I 5510~1
AT7E5T:
~I~. ~ %~
SECRETARY~ ANANEIM CITY LAPINI~IG COMMISSIQt~
_2_ PC79-140
~•. /
STATE Of CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I. Edith L. Ha~ris. Secre[ary of the Anaheim City Planning Cortr~tssion~ do
hereby ccrtify that the foregoirsg resotution Nas passed and adopted at a meettng of
the Anaheim City Pianning Commtssion held on July 2. 1979. by thc following vote of
the membcrs thercof:
AYES: GOM`115SIONERS: BARNES. BUS}IORE, DAVID~ FRY. HER85T, Y.ING, 70LAR
NOES: COMMISSI0NER5: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
IN 1JITNESS HHEfiEOF, i have hereunto set my hand this 2nd day of July, 1979.
~C~ ,~ xr~,~.:
SECoc~rtoY, ANAHEtM CITY LANNIt~G LOHHISSION
-3- Pt79-140